• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

β-痕迹蛋白和胱抑素 C 可预测急性心力衰竭患者的长期预后。

β-trace protein and cystatin C as predictors of long-term outcomes in patients with acute heart failure.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Virgen de Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Feb 15;57(7):849-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.08.644.

DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2010.08.644
PMID:21310322
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognostic importance of novel markers of renal dysfunction among patients with acutely destabilized heart failure (ADHF).

BACKGROUND

β-trace protein (BTP) and cystatin C are newer biomarkers for renal dysfunction; the prognostic importance of these tests, particularly BTP, relative to standard measures of renal function remains unclear.

METHODS

A total of 220 consecutive hospitalized patients with ADHF were prospectively studied. Blood samples were collected on presentation. In-hospital worsening renal function, as well as mortality and/or heart failure (HF) hospitalization, over a median follow-up period of 500 days was examined as a function of BTP or cystatin C concentrations; results were compared with creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and blood urea nitrogen.

RESULTS

Neither BTP nor cystatin C was associated with worsening renal function during the index hospitalization. A total of 116 patients (53%) either died or were hospitalized for HF during follow-up. Those with adverse outcomes had higher BTP (1.04 mg/l [range 0.80 to 1.49 mg/l] vs. 0.88 mg/l [range 0.68 to 1.17 mg/l], p = 0.003) and cystatin C (1.29 mg/l [range 1.00 to 1.71 mg/l] vs. 1.03 mg/l [range 0.86 to 1.43 mg/l], p = 0.001). After multivariable adjustment, both BTP (hazard ratio: 1.41, 95% confidence interval: 1.06 to 1.88; p = 0.018) and cystatin C (hazard ratio: 1.50, 95% confidence interval: 1.13 to 2.01; p = 0.006) were significant predictors of death/HF hospitalization, whereas serum creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and blood urea nitrogen were no longer significant. In patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate >60 ml/min/1.73 m(2), elevated concentrations of BTP and cystatin C were still associated with significantly higher risk of adverse clinical events (p < 0.05). Net reclassification index analysis suggested cystatin C and BTP deliver comparable information regarding prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients hospitalized with ADHF, BTP and cystatin C predict risk of death and/or HF hospitalization and are superior to standard measures of renal function for this indication.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估急性失代偿性心力衰竭(ADHF)患者肾功能新标志物的预后重要性。

背景

β-痕迹蛋白(BTP)和胱抑素 C 是用于肾功能障碍的新型生物标志物;这些检测的预后重要性,尤其是 BTP,相对于标准肾功能检测仍不明确。

方法

对 220 例连续住院的 ADHF 患者进行前瞻性研究。入院时采集血样。中位随访期为 500 天后,检测 BTP 或胱抑素 C 浓度与住院期间肾功能恶化、死亡率和/或心力衰竭(HF)住院之间的关系;结果与肌酐、估计肾小球滤过率和血尿素氮进行比较。

结果

BTP 和胱抑素 C 均与住院期间肾功能恶化无关。随访期间共有 116 例(53%)患者死亡或因 HF 住院。不良预后患者的 BTP 水平更高(1.04mg/L[范围 0.80 至 1.49mg/L]比 0.88mg/L[范围 0.68 至 1.17mg/L],p=0.003),胱抑素 C 水平也更高(1.29mg/L[范围 1.00 至 1.71mg/L]比 1.03mg/L[范围 0.86 至 1.43mg/L],p=0.001)。多变量调整后,BTP(危险比:1.41,95%置信区间:1.06 至 1.88;p=0.018)和胱抑素 C(危险比:1.50,95%置信区间:1.13 至 2.01;p=0.006)均为死亡/HF 住院的显著预测因子,而血清肌酐、估计肾小球滤过率和血尿素氮不再显著。在估计肾小球滤过率>60ml/min/1.73m2 的患者中,BTP 和胱抑素 C 浓度升高与不良临床事件的风险显著增加仍相关(p<0.05)。净重新分类指数分析表明,胱抑素 C 和 BTP 提供了关于预后的相似信息。

结论

在住院治疗的 ADHF 患者中,BTP 和胱抑素 C 预测死亡和/或 HF 住院风险,对于该适应证优于标准肾功能检测。

相似文献

1
β-trace protein and cystatin C as predictors of long-term outcomes in patients with acute heart failure.β-痕迹蛋白和胱抑素 C 可预测急性心力衰竭患者的长期预后。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Feb 15;57(7):849-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.08.644.
2
Usefulness of β-trace protein and cystatin C for the prediction of mortality in non ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes.β-痕迹蛋白和胱抑素 C 对非 ST 段抬高急性冠状动脉综合征患者死亡率的预测价值。
Am J Cardiol. 2012 Nov 1;110(9):1240-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.06.027. Epub 2012 Jul 19.
3
Cystatin C in acute heart failure without advanced renal impairment.无晚期肾功能损害的急性心力衰竭患者中的胱抑素C
Am J Med. 2009 Jun;122(6):566-73. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.10.042. Epub 2009 Apr 24.
4
Complementary prognostic value of cystatin C, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic Peptide and cardiac troponin T in patients with acute heart failure.胱抑素C、N末端前B型利钠肽和心肌肌钙蛋白T在急性心力衰竭患者中的补充预后价值。
Am J Cardiol. 2009 Jun 15;103(12):1753-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.02.029.
5
Cystatin-C and beta trace protein as markers of renal function in pregnancy.胱抑素-C和β-微球蛋白作为妊娠期肾功能指标
BJOG. 2005 May;112(5):575-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00492.x.
6
Is beta-trace protein an alternative marker of glomerular filtration rate in liver transplant recipients?β-痕迹蛋白是否是肝移植受者肾小球滤过率的替代标志物?
Liver Int. 2011 Oct;31(9):1345-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2011.02569.x. Epub 2011 Jun 23.
7
Effect of clinical variables and immunosuppression on serum cystatin C and beta-trace protein in kidney transplant recipients.临床变量和免疫抑制对肾移植受者血清胱抑素C和β-微球蛋白的影响。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2009 Nov;54(5):922-30. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.06.003. Epub 2009 Jul 19.
8
Clinical value of cystatin C and beta-trace protein in glomerular filtration rate in renal transplant cases with stable renal graft functions: comparison by the 99mTc-DTPA plasma sample method.胱抑素C和β-微球蛋白在肾移植肾功能稳定患者肾小球滤过率评估中的临床价值:与99mTc-DTPA血浆样本法比较
Nucl Med Commun. 2014 Jul;35(7):733-44. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000000116.
9
Beta-trace protein and cystatin c as predictors of major bleeding in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome.β-痕迹蛋白和胱抑素 C 作为非 ST 段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者主要出血的预测因子。
Circ J. 2013;77(8):2088-96. doi: 10.1253/circj.cj-13-0106. Epub 2013 May 23.
10
Serum creatinine, cystatin C, and beta-trace protein in diagnostic staging and predicting progression of primary nondiabetic chronic kidney disease.血清肌酐、胱抑素 C 和β-痕迹蛋白在原发性非糖尿病慢性肾脏病的诊断分期和预测进展中的作用。
Clin Chem. 2010 May;56(5):740-9. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2009.138826. Epub 2010 Mar 11.

引用本文的文献

1
The Prognostic Role of Serum β-Trace Protein Levels among Patients on Maintenance Hemodialysis.维持性血液透析患者血清β-微球蛋白水平的预后作用
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 May 7;14(10):974. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14100974.
2
Emerging biomarkers for the detection of cardiovascular diseases.用于检测心血管疾病的新兴生物标志物。
Egypt Heart J. 2022 Oct 20;74(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s43044-022-00317-2.
3
Biomarkers in Acute Heart Failure Syndromes: An Update.急性心力衰竭综合征中的生物标志物:更新。
Curr Cardiol Rev. 2022;18(3):e090921196330. doi: 10.2174/1573403X17666210909170415.
4
Does Beta-Trace Protein (BTP) Outperform Cystatin C as a Diagnostic Marker of Acute Kidney Injury Complicating the Early Phase of Acute Pancreatitis?在急性胰腺炎早期并发急性肾损伤的诊断中,β-微球蛋白(BTP)作为诊断标志物是否优于胱抑素C?
J Clin Med. 2020 Jan 11;9(1):205. doi: 10.3390/jcm9010205.
5
Synthesizing Markers of Kidney Injury in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure: Should We Even Keep Looking?急性失代偿性心力衰竭中肾损伤标志物的综合分析:我们还应继续探寻吗?
Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2019 Dec;16(6):257-273. doi: 10.1007/s11897-019-00448-9.
6
Cystatin C for predicting all-cause mortality and rehospitalization in patients with heart failure: a meta-analysis.胱抑素 C 预测心力衰竭患者全因死亡率和再住院率的荟萃分析。
Biosci Rep. 2019 Feb 5;39(2). doi: 10.1042/BSR20181761. Print 2019 Feb 28.
7
Redefining biomarkers in heart failure.重新定义心力衰竭的生物标志物。
Heart Fail Rev. 2018 Mar;23(2):237-253. doi: 10.1007/s10741-018-9683-2.
8
Serum Beta-Trace Protein as a Novel Predictor of Pregnancy-Induced Hypertension.血清β-微量蛋白作为妊娠高血压的新型预测指标。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2016 Oct;18(10):1022-1026. doi: 10.1111/jch.12801. Epub 2016 Mar 4.
9
Elevated Serum Beta-Trace Protein Levels are Associated With the Presence of Atrial Fibrillation in Hypertension Patients.高血压患者血清β-微量蛋白水平升高与心房颤动的存在有关。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2016 May;18(5):439-43. doi: 10.1111/jch.12703. Epub 2015 Oct 5.
10
Increased Circulating Cathepsin K in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure.慢性心力衰竭患者循环组织蛋白酶K水平升高。
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 24;10(8):e0136093. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136093. eCollection 2015.