• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生成效应:单因素理论与多因素理论之间的一项测试。

The generation effect: a test between single- and multifactor theories.

作者信息

Burns D J

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Lafayette College, Easton, Pennsylvania 18042.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1990 Nov;16(6):1060-7. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.16.6.1060.

DOI:10.1037//0278-7393.16.6.1060
PMID:2148579
Abstract

Single- and multifactor accounts of the generation effect (better memory for internally generated items than for externally presented items) were tested. Single-factor theories suggest that generation induces either stimulus-response relational processing or response-oriented processing. Multifactor theories suggest that generation induces both types of processing. In the first three experiments subjects either read or generated responses, and the degree of categorical structure within the list was manipulated. When categorical structure was minimal, large generation effects were observed for free recall and recognition, but not for cued recall. When categorical structure was high, however, a generation effect was observed for cued recall but not for recognition or free recall. A fourth experiment was performed to eliminate an uninteresting interpretation of the results. It is argued that a multifactor account is needed to explain these findings.

摘要

对生成效应(对内部生成项目的记忆优于外部呈现项目)的单因素和多因素解释进行了测试。单因素理论认为,生成会引发刺激-反应关系加工或反应导向加工。多因素理论认为,生成会引发这两种加工类型。在前三个实验中,受试者要么阅读要么生成反应,并对列表中的分类结构程度进行了操纵。当分类结构最小时,自由回忆和识别中观察到较大的生成效应,但线索回忆中未观察到。然而,当分类结构较高时,线索回忆中观察到了生成效应,但识别或自由回忆中未观察到。进行了第四个实验以消除对结果的一种无趣解释。有人认为需要用多因素解释来解释这些发现。

相似文献

1
The generation effect: a test between single- and multifactor theories.生成效应:单因素理论与多因素理论之间的一项测试。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1990 Nov;16(6):1060-7. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.16.6.1060.
2
Hypermnesia in free recall and cued recall.自由回忆和线索回忆中的记忆增强。
Mem Cognit. 1993 Jan;21(1):48-62. doi: 10.3758/bf03211164.
3
Generation effects in free recall: further support for a three-factor theory.自由回忆中的生成效应:对三因素理论的进一步支持。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1990 Sep;16(5):789-98. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.16.5.789.
4
Generation and hypermnesia.生成与记忆增强。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2001 Mar;27(2):436-50. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.27.2.436.
5
Generation enhances semantic processing? The role of distinctiveness in the generation effect.生成会增强语义加工吗?独特性在生成效应中的作用。
Mem Cognit. 1989 Sep;17(5):563-71. doi: 10.3758/bf03197079.
6
Does organization improve priming?组织会改善启动效应吗?
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1991 Jan;17(1):103-14. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.17.1.103.
7
The generation effect extended: memory enhancement for generation cues.
Mem Cognit. 1989 Nov;17(6):673-81. doi: 10.3758/bf03202628.
8
Priming and aging: further evidence of preserved memory function.启动与老化:记忆功能保留的进一步证据。
Am J Psychol. 1991 Spring;104(1):89-100.
9
Cued recall from image and sentence memory: a shift from episodic to identical elements representation.基于图像和句子记忆的线索回忆:从情景记忆到相同元素表征的转变。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006 Jul;32(4):734-48. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.4.734.
10
Altering memory through recall: the effects of cue-guided retrieval processing.通过回忆改变记忆:线索引导的检索加工的影响。
Mem Cognit. 1989 Jul;17(4):423-34. doi: 10.3758/bf03202614.

引用本文的文献

1
Illusory feelings of prediction during déjà entendu: An auditory analog to illusory feelings of prediction during déjà vu.似曾听闻时的虚幻预测感:一种与似曾相识时的虚幻预测感类似的听觉现象。
Mem Cognit. 2025 Apr 29. doi: 10.3758/s13421-025-01716-x.
2
Metamemory judgments and design effects: Judgment of learning (JOL) reactivity in free recall is affected by study list structure.元记忆判断与设计效应:自由回忆中的学习判断(JOL)反应性受学习列表结构的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2024 Sep 23. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01638-0.
3
Comparing the testing effect under blocked and mixed practice: The mnemonic benefits of retrieval practice are not affected by practice format.
比较集中练习和混合练习下的测试效应:检索练习的记忆效果不受练习形式的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2017 Jan;45(1):81-92. doi: 10.3758/s13421-016-0641-8.
4
The bizarre imagery effect and intention to learn.奇异的意象效应和学习意图。
Psychon Bull Rev. 1996 Jun;3(2):254-7. doi: 10.3758/BF03212428.
5
The generation effect in patients with mild cognitive impairment.轻度认知障碍患者的生成效应。
Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2010 Nov;25(7):576-84. doi: 10.1177/1533317510382284.
6
Assessing a retrieval account of the generation and perceptual-interference effects.评估关于生成效应和知觉干扰效应的一种提取解释。
Mem Cognit. 2008 Dec;36(8):1371-82. doi: 10.3758/MC.36.8.1371.
7
Instability in memory phenomena: a common puzzle and a unifying explanation.记忆现象的不稳定性:一个常见难题及统一解释。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Apr;15(2):237-55. doi: 10.3758/pbr.15.2.237.
8
A little elaboration goes a long way: the role of generation in eyewitness suggestibility.稍加阐述就能大有帮助:生成在目击者易受暗示性中的作用。
Mem Cognit. 2007 Sep;35(6):1255-66. doi: 10.3758/bf03193599.
9
Positive and negative generation effects, hypermnesia, and total recall time.
Mem Cognit. 2002 Oct;30(7):1044-53. doi: 10.3758/bf03194322.
10
A functional relation between learning and organization in free recall.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2000 Sep;7(3):516-21. doi: 10.3758/bf03214365.