Suppr超能文献

背景实质增强在乳腺磁共振成像和乳腺癌风险中的作用。

Background parenchymal enhancement at breast MR imaging and breast cancer risk.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, Evelyn H. Lauder Breast Center, 300 E 66th St, Room 715, New York, NY 10065, USA.

出版信息

Radiology. 2011 Jul;260(1):50-60. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11102156. Epub 2011 Apr 14.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To examine the relationships between breast cancer and both amount of fibroglandular tissue (FGT) and level of background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) at magnetic resonance (MR) imaging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A waiver of authorization was granted by the institutional review board for this retrospective HIPAA-compliant study. Among 1275 women who underwent breast MR imaging screening between December 2002 and February 2008, 39 breast carcinoma cases were identified. Two comparisons were performed: In one comparison, two normal controls--those of the women with negative (benign) findings at breast MR imaging--were matched to each breast cancer case on the basis of age and date of MR imaging. In the second comparison, one false-positive control--that of a woman with suspicious but nonmalignant findings at MR imaging--was similarly matched to each breast cancer case. Two readers independently rated the level of MR imaging-depicted BPE and the amount of MR imaging-depicted FGT by using a categorical scale: BPE was categorized as minimal, mild, moderate, or marked, and FGT was categorized as fatty, scattered, heterogeneously dense, or dense.

RESULTS

Compared with the odds ratio (OR) for a normal control, the OR for breast cancer increased significantly with increasing BPE: The ORs for moderate or marked BPE versus minimal or mild BPE were 10.1 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.9, 35.3; P < .001) and 3.3 (95% CI: 1.3, 8.3; P = .006) for readers 1 and 2, respectively. Similar odds were seen when the false-positive controls were compared with the breast cancer cases: The ORs for moderate or marked BPE versus minimal or mild BPE were 5.1 (95% CI: 1.4, 19.1; P = .005) and 3.7 (95% CI: 1.2, 11.2; P = .013) for readers 1 and 2, respectively. The breast cancer odds also increased with increasing FGT, but the BPE findings remained significant after adjustment for FGT.

CONCLUSION

Increased BPE is strongly predictive of breast cancer odds.

摘要

目的

探讨乳腺磁共振(MR)成像中乳腺癌与纤维腺体组织(FGT)量和背景实质强化(BPE)水平的关系。

材料与方法

本回顾性 HIPAA 合规研究获得机构审查委员会豁免授权。在 2002 年 12 月至 2008 年 2 月间行乳腺 MR 成像筛查的 1275 名女性中,发现 39 例乳腺癌病例。进行了两项对比:在一项对比中,两名正常对照者(即乳腺 MR 成像检查结果为阴性(良性)的女性)与每例乳腺癌病例按年龄和 MR 成像日期相匹配。在第二项对比中,一名假阳性对照者(即 MR 成像检查结果提示可疑但非恶性的女性)与每例乳腺癌病例相匹配。两名读者分别使用分类量表独立评估 MR 成像描绘的 BPE 水平和 FGT 量:BPE 分为轻度、中度、重度;FGT 分为脂肪型、散在型、不均匀致密型和致密型。

结果

与正常对照者的比值比(OR)相比,BPE 增加时乳腺癌的 OR 显著增加:BPE 为中度或重度与轻度或轻度相比,读者 1 和 2 的 OR 分别为 10.1(95%置信区间[CI]:2.9,35.3;P<0.001)和 3.3(95%CI:1.3,8.3;P=0.006)。当假阳性对照者与乳腺癌病例相比时,也观察到相似的比值比:BPE 为中度或重度与轻度或轻度相比,读者 1 和 2 的 OR 分别为 5.1(95%CI:1.4,19.1;P=0.005)和 3.7(95%CI:1.2,11.2;P=0.013)。随着 FGT 的增加,乳腺癌的几率也增加,但在调整 FGT 后,BPE 结果仍然具有显著意义。

结论

BPE 增加与乳腺癌几率密切相关。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

1
Relationship between breast tissue involution and breast cancer.乳腺组织退化与乳腺癌之间的关系。
Front Oncol. 2025 Apr 7;15:1420350. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1420350. eCollection 2025.
4
Breast MRI to Screen Women With Extremely Dense Breasts.乳腺磁共振成像用于筛查乳腺极度致密的女性。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2025 Jul;62(1):58-72. doi: 10.1002/jmri.29716. Epub 2025 Jan 24.
7
Early Detection of Breast Cancer in MRI Using AI.利用人工智能在磁共振成像中早期检测乳腺癌
Acad Radiol. 2025 Mar;32(3):1218-1225. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2024.10.014. Epub 2024 Oct 30.

本文引用的文献

9
Diagnostic breast MR imaging: current status and future directions.乳腺磁共振成像诊断:现状与未来方向
Radiol Clin North Am. 2007 Sep;45(5):863-80, vii. doi: 10.1016/j.rcl.2007.07.002.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验