Department of Health Informatics, School of Public Health, Kyoto University, Yoshida Konoe-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan.
Qual Life Res. 2012 Mar;21(2):335-40. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9939-y. Epub 2011 Jun 4.
We compared Japanese versions of the EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL and QLQ-C30 to assess the utility of the former survey for terminal-phase cancer patients.
We used QLQ-C30 scores from the survey prior to each patient's death and extracted QLQ-C15-PAL data. We determined intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) of the five QLQ-C15-PAL subscales: physical functioning, emotional functioning, fatigue, nausea and vomiting, and global health status/quality of life (QOL) and assessed equivalent-form reliability. Regression analysis was used to determine the extent to which QLQ-C15-PAL items explained the QLQ-C30 score.
Our study included 32 of 91 cancer patients receiving palliative care who could self-administer the questionnaire. The ICC between the QLQ-C15-PAL and QLQ-C30 scores was 0.93 or higher. The proportion of variance (R-squared) for each subscale was 0.87 or higher.
We examined the validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the QLQ-C15-PAL. We found an 87% or higher chance that the QLQ-C15-PAL could explain the original QLQ-C30 score. Therefore, QLQ-C15-PAL appears to be useful for assessing the QOL of terminal-phase cancer patients.
我们比较了 EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL 和 QLQ-C30 的日语文本,以评估前者在终末期癌症患者中的应用价值。
我们使用了每位患者死亡前调查的 QLQ-C30 评分,并提取了 QLQ-C15-PAL 数据。我们确定了五个 QLQ-C15-PAL 子量表的组内相关系数(ICC):身体功能、情绪功能、疲劳、恶心和呕吐以及整体健康状况/生活质量(QOL),并评估了等效形式的可靠性。回归分析用于确定 QLQ-C15-PAL 项目在多大程度上解释了 QLQ-C30 评分。
我们的研究纳入了 91 名接受姑息治疗的癌症患者中的 32 名,他们能够自行完成问卷。QLQ-C15-PAL 和 QLQ-C30 评分之间的 ICC 为 0.93 或更高。每个子量表的方差比例(R 平方)为 0.87 或更高。
我们检验了 QLQ-C15-PAL 日语文本的有效性和可靠性。我们发现 QLQ-C15-PAL 有 87%或更高的可能性解释原始 QLQ-C30 评分。因此,QLQ-C15-PAL 似乎可用于评估终末期癌症患者的生活质量。