Tobacco Harm Reduction Research, University of Louisville, Room 208, Clinical Translational Research Building, 505 S, Hancock Street, KY 40202, Louisville, USA.
Harm Reduct J. 2011 Jul 29;8:19. doi: 10.1186/1477-7517-8-19.
Over the past five years there has been exponential expansion of interest in tobacco harm reduction (THR), with a concomitant increase in the number of published studies. The purpose of this manuscript is to review and analyze influential contributions to the scientific and medical literature relating to THR, and to discuss issues that continue to stimulate debate. Numerous epidemiologic studies and subsequent meta-analyses confirm that smokeless tobacco (ST) use is associated with minimal risks for cancer and for myocardial infarction; a small increased risk for stroke cannot be excluded. Studies from Sweden document that ST use is not associated with benign gastrointestinal disorders and chronic inflammatory diseases. Although any form of nicotine should be avoided during pregnancy, the highest risks for the developing baby are associated with smoking. It is documented that ST use has been a key factor in the declining rates of smoking and of smoking-related diseases in Sweden and Norway. For other countries, the potential population health benefits of ST are far greater than the potential risks. In follow-up studies, dual users of cigarettes and ST are less likely than exclusive smokers to achieve complete tobacco abstinence, but they are also less likely to be smoking. The health risks from dual use are probably lower than those from exclusive smoking. E-cigarette users are not exposed to the many toxicants, carcinogens and abundant free radicals formed when tobacco is burned. Although laboratory studies have detected trace concentrations of some contaminants, it is a small problem amenable to improvements in quality control and manufacturing that are likely with FDA regulation as tobacco products. There is limited evidence from clinical trials that e-cigarettes deliver only small doses of nicotine compared with conventional cigarettes. However, e-cigarette use emulates successfully the cigarette handling rituals and cues of cigarette smoking, which produces suppression of craving and withdrawal that is not entirely attributable to nicotine delivery. THR has been described as having "the potential to lead to one of the greatest public health breakthroughs in human history by fundamentally changing the forecast of a billion cigarette-caused deaths this century."
在过去的五年中,人们对烟草减害 (THR) 的兴趣呈指数级增长,与之相应的,发表的研究数量也在增加。本文的目的是回顾和分析与 THR 相关的科学和医学文献中的有影响力的贡献,并讨论继续引发争议的问题。大量的流行病学研究和随后的荟萃分析证实,使用无烟烟草 (ST) 与癌症和心肌梗死的风险极小相关;不能排除小的中风风险增加。来自瑞典的研究表明,ST 使用与良性胃肠道疾病和慢性炎症性疾病无关。虽然怀孕期间应避免任何形式的尼古丁,但发育中的婴儿面临的风险最高与吸烟有关。有记录表明,ST 使用是瑞典和挪威吸烟率和与吸烟相关的疾病下降的关键因素。对于其他国家,ST 的潜在人群健康益处远远大于潜在风险。在后续研究中,香烟和 ST 的双重使用者比单纯的吸烟者更不可能完全戒烟,但他们也不太可能吸烟。双重使用的健康风险可能低于单纯吸烟的风险。电子烟使用者不会接触到烟草燃烧时形成的许多有毒物质、致癌物和大量自由基。虽然实验室研究检测到了一些污染物的痕量浓度,但这是一个可以通过提高质量控制和制造来解决的小问题,而且随着 FDA 对烟草产品的监管,这种问题很可能得到改善。从临床试验中获得的证据有限,表明电子烟与传统香烟相比只输送少量尼古丁。然而,电子烟的使用成功地模仿了香烟的处理仪式和吸烟线索,这产生了抑制渴望和戒断的效果,而不仅仅归因于尼古丁的输送。THR 被描述为“有可能通过从根本上改变本世纪预计的 10 亿例由香烟引起的死亡,从而带来人类历史上最伟大的公共卫生突破之一”。