Macquarie Centre for Cognitive Science, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia.
Cogn Sci. 2011 Nov-Dec;35(8):1567-79. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01196.x. Epub 2011 Oct 7.
One of the most influential studies in all expertise research is de Groot's (1946) study of chess players, which suggested that pattern recognition, rather than search, was the key determinant of expertise. Many changes have occurred in the chess world since de Groot's study, leading some authors to argue that the cognitive mechanisms underlying expertise have also changed. We decided to replicate de Groot's study to empirically test these claims and to examine whether the trends in the data have changed over time. Six Grandmasters, five International Masters, six Experts, and five Class A players completed the think-aloud procedure for two chess positions. Findings indicate that Grandmasters and International Masters search more quickly than Experts and Class A players, and that both groups today search substantially faster than players in previous studies. The findings, however, support de Groot's overall conclusions and are consistent with predictions made by pattern recognition models.
最有影响力的专家研究之一是德格鲁特(1946)对国际象棋棋手的研究,该研究表明,模式识别而非搜索是专家的关键决定因素。自德格鲁特的研究以来,国际象棋界发生了许多变化,一些作者认为,专家背后的认知机制也发生了变化。我们决定复制德格鲁特的研究,以实证检验这些说法,并检查数据中的趋势是否随时间发生了变化。六位特级大师、五位国际大师、六位专家和五位 A 级选手完成了对两个国际象棋位置的出声思维过程。研究结果表明,特级大师和国际大师的搜索速度比专家和 A 级选手快,而这两个群体的搜索速度都比以前的研究中的选手快得多。然而,这些发现支持了德格鲁特的总体结论,并与模式识别模型的预测一致。