Giardini Francesca
Department of Cognitive Science, Central European University, 1023 Frankel Leo u., 30-34, Budapest, Hungary.
Cogn Process. 2012 Oct;13 Suppl 2:465-75. doi: 10.1007/s10339-011-0421-0. Epub 2011 Oct 9.
Spreading information about the members of one's group is one of the most universal human behaviors. Thanks to gossip, individuals can acquire the information about their peers without sustaining the burden of costly interactions with cheaters, but they can also create and revise social bonds. Gossip has also several positive functions at the group level, promoting cohesion and norm compliance. However, gossip can be unreliable, and can be used to damage others' reputation or to circulate false information, thus becoming detrimental to people involved and useless for the group. In this work, we propose a theoretical model in which reliability of gossip depends on the joint functioning of two distinct mechanisms. Thanks to the first, i.e., deterrence, individuals tend to avoid informational cheating because they fear punishment and the disruption of social bonds. On the other hand, transmission provides humans with the opportunity of reducing the consequences of cheating through a manipulation of the source of gossip.
传播关于自己群体成员的信息是最普遍的人类行为之一。多亏了流言蜚语,个体可以在不承担与骗子进行代价高昂互动的负担的情况下获取关于同伴的信息,但他们也可以建立和修正社会关系。流言蜚语在群体层面也有几个积极作用,促进凝聚力和规范遵守。然而,流言蜚语可能不可靠,并且可能被用来损害他人声誉或传播虚假信息,从而对相关人员有害且对群体无用。在这项工作中,我们提出了一个理论模型,其中流言蜚语的可靠性取决于两种不同机制的共同作用。多亏了第一种机制,即威慑,个体倾向于避免信息欺骗,因为他们害怕惩罚和社会关系的破裂。另一方面,传播为人类提供了通过操纵流言蜚语的来源来减少欺骗后果的机会。