• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

图像标签的稳健统计融合。

Robust statistical fusion of image labels.

机构信息

Department of Electrical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235 USA.

出版信息

IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2012 Feb;31(2):512-22. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2011.2172215. Epub 2011 Oct 14.

DOI:10.1109/TMI.2011.2172215
PMID:22010145
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3262958/
Abstract

Image labeling and parcellation (i.e., assigning structure to a collection of voxels) are critical tasks for the assessment of volumetric and morphometric features in medical imaging data. The process of image labeling is inherently error prone as images are corrupted by noise and artifacts. Even expert interpretations are subject to subjectivity and the precision of the individual raters. Hence, all labels must be considered imperfect with some degree of inherent variability. One may seek multiple independent assessments to both reduce this variability and quantify the degree of uncertainty. Existing techniques have exploited maximum a posteriori statistics to combine data from multiple raters and simultaneously estimate rater reliabilities. Although quite successful, wide-scale application has been hampered by unstable estimation with practical datasets, for example, with label sets with small or thin objects to be labeled or with partial or limited datasets. As well, these approaches have required each rater to generate a complete dataset, which is often impossible given both human foibles and the typical turnover rate of raters in a research or clinical environment. Herein, we propose a robust approach to improve estimation performance with small anatomical structures, allow for missing data, account for repeated label sets, and utilize training/catch trial data. With this approach, numerous raters can label small, overlapping portions of a large dataset, and rater heterogeneity can be robustly controlled while simultaneously estimating a single, reliable label set and characterizing uncertainty. The proposed approach enables many individuals to collaborate in the construction of large datasets for labeling tasks (e.g., human parallel processing) and reduces the otherwise detrimental impact of rater unavailability.

摘要

图像标注和分割(即将结构分配给体素集合)是医学成像数据中评估体积和形态特征的关键任务。由于图像受到噪声和伪影的干扰,因此图像标注的过程本身容易出错。即使是专家的解释也受到主观性和个体评分者的准确性的影响。因此,所有标签都必须被认为是不完美的,具有一定程度的固有可变性。人们可能会寻求多个独立的评估,以降低这种可变性并量化不确定性的程度。现有的技术已经利用最大后验统计来结合来自多个评分者的数据,并同时估计评分者的可靠性。尽管非常成功,但由于实用数据集的估计不稳定,例如,要标记的标签集具有小或薄的物体,或者数据集部分或有限,这些方法的广泛应用受到了阻碍。此外,这些方法要求每个评分者生成一个完整的数据集,但在研究或临床环境中,由于人为的弱点和评分者的典型周转率,这通常是不可能的。在此,我们提出了一种稳健的方法,用于改善小解剖结构的估计性能,允许存在缺失数据,考虑重复的标签集,并利用训练/捕获试验数据。通过这种方法,许多评分者可以标记大型数据集的小重叠部分,可以稳健地控制评分者的异质性,同时估计单个可靠的标签集并描述不确定性。该方法可以使许多人能够协作构建用于标注任务的大型数据集(例如,人类并行处理),并减少评分者不可用的不利影响。

相似文献

1
Robust statistical fusion of image labels.图像标签的稳健统计融合。
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2012 Feb;31(2):512-22. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2011.2172215. Epub 2011 Oct 14.
2
Simultaneous Truth and Performance Level Estimation with Incomplete, Over-complete, and Ancillary Data.利用不完整、超完备和辅助数据进行同时真值和性能水平估计
Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2010 Mar 12;7623:76231N. doi: 10.1117/12.844182.
3
Simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE): an algorithm for the validation of image segmentation.同步真值与性能水平估计(STAPLE):一种用于图像分割验证的算法。
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2004 Jul;23(7):903-21. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2004.828354.
4
Robust statistical label fusion through COnsensus Level, Labeler Accuracy, and Truth Estimation (COLLATE).通过一致性水平、标注者准确率和真值估计(COLLATE)实现稳健的统计标签融合。
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2011 Oct;30(10):1779-94. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2011.2147795. Epub 2011 Apr 29.
5
Foibles, Follies, and Fusion: Assessment of Statistical Label Fusion Techniques for Web-Based Collaborations using Minimal Training.弱点、 folly 与融合:使用最少训练对基于网络协作的统计标签融合技术的评估
Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2011;7962:79623G. doi: 10.1117/12.877471.
6
Self-assessed performance improves statistical fusion of image labels.自我评估性能可改善图像标签的统计融合。
Med Phys. 2014 Mar;41(3):031903. doi: 10.1118/1.4864236.
7
Characterizing spatially varying performance to improve multi-atlas multi-label segmentation.表征空间变化的性能以改进多图谱多标签分割。
Inf Process Med Imaging. 2011;22:85-96. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-22092-0_8.
8
Tree-structured CRF models for interactive image labeling.树结构条件随机场模型在交互式图像标注中的应用。
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2013 Feb;35(2):476-89. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2012.100.
9
Non-local statistical label fusion for multi-atlas segmentation.非局部统计标签融合的多图谱分割。
Med Image Anal. 2013 Feb;17(2):194-208. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2012.10.002. Epub 2012 Nov 29.
10
Foibles, follies, and fusion: web-based collaboration for medical image labeling.缺陷、愚蠢与融合:用于医学图像标注的基于网络的协作。
Neuroimage. 2012 Jan 2;59(1):530-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.07.085. Epub 2011 Aug 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Random expert sampling for deep learning segmentation of acute ischemic stroke on non-contrast CT.用于基于非增强CT的急性缺血性卒中深度学习分割的随机专家抽样
J Neurointerv Surg. 2024 Feb 1. doi: 10.1136/jnis-2023-021283.
2
Simultaneous total intracranial volume and posterior fossa volume estimation using multi-atlas label fusion.使用多图谱标签融合技术同时估计全颅内体积和后颅窝体积
Hum Brain Mapp. 2017 Feb;38(2):599-616. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23432. Epub 2016 Oct 11.
3
Investigation of Bias in Continuous Medical Image Label Fusion.连续医学图像标签融合中的偏差研究

本文引用的文献

1
Characterizing spatially varying performance to improve multi-atlas multi-label segmentation.表征空间变化的性能以改进多图谱多标签分割。
Inf Process Med Imaging. 2011;22:85-96. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-22092-0_8.
2
Statistical Fusion of Surface Labels Provided by Multiple Raters.多位评估者提供的表面标签的统计融合
Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2010 Mar 1;7623. doi: 10.1117/12.844214.
3
Incorporating priors on expert performance parameters for segmentation validation and label fusion: a maximum a posteriori STAPLE.纳入用于分割验证和标签融合的专家性能参数先验信息:最大后验概率STAPLE算法
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 3;11(6):e0155862. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155862. eCollection 2016.
4
MUSE: MUlti-atlas region Segmentation utilizing Ensembles of registration algorithms and parameters, and locally optimal atlas selection.MUSE:利用配准算法和参数集合以及局部最优图谱选择的多图谱区域分割
Neuroimage. 2016 Feb 15;127:186-195. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.11.073. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
5
Automated cerebellar lobule segmentation with application to cerebellar structural analysis in cerebellar disease.用于小脑疾病小脑结构分析的自动小脑小叶分割
Neuroimage. 2016 Feb 15;127:435-444. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.09.032. Epub 2015 Sep 25.
6
Multi-atlas segmentation of biomedical images: A survey.生物医学图像的多图谱分割:一项综述。
Med Image Anal. 2015 Aug;24(1):205-219. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2015.06.012. Epub 2015 Jul 6.
7
Optimal MAP Parameters Estimation in STAPLE Using Local Intensity Similarity Information.基于局部强度相似性信息的STAPLE中最优MAP参数估计
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2015 Sep;19(5):1589-97. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2015.2428279. Epub 2015 Apr 30.
8
An algorithm for optimal fusion of atlases with different labeling protocols.一种用于将具有不同标注协议的图谱进行最优融合的算法。
Neuroimage. 2015 Feb 1;106:451-63. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.11.031. Epub 2014 Nov 22.
9
A logarithmic opinion pool based STAPLE algorithm for the fusion of segmentations with associated reliability weights.一种基于对数意见池的STAPLE算法,用于融合带有相关可靠性权重的分割结果。
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2014 Oct;33(10):1997-2009. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2014.2329603. Epub 2014 Jun 12.
10
Self-assessed performance improves statistical fusion of image labels.自我评估性能可改善图像标签的统计融合。
Med Phys. 2014 Mar;41(3):031903. doi: 10.1118/1.4864236.
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2010;13(Pt 3):25-32. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-15711-0_4.
4
Label fusion in atlas-based segmentation using a selective and iterative method for performance level estimation (SIMPLE).基于图谱的分割中的标签融合使用选择性和迭代方法进行性能水平估计 (SIMPLE)。
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2010 Dec;29(12):2000-8. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2010.2057442. Epub 2010 Jul 26.
5
A generative model for image segmentation based on label fusion.基于标签融合的图像分割生成模型。
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2010 Oct;29(10):1714-29. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2010.2050897. Epub 2010 Jun 17.
6
AUTOMATICALLY IDENTIFYING WHITE MATTER TRACTS USING CORTICAL LABELS.使用皮质标记自动识别白质束
Proc IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imaging. 2008 May:895. doi: 10.1109/ISBI.2008.4541141.
7
The Java Image Science Toolkit (JIST) for rapid prototyping and publishing of neuroimaging software.Java 图像科学工具包 (JIST),用于快速原型设计和发布神经影像学软件。
Neuroinformatics. 2010 Mar;8(1):5-17. doi: 10.1007/s12021-009-9061-2.
8
Fast and robust multi-atlas segmentation of brain magnetic resonance images.快速且稳健的脑磁共振图像多图谱分割。
Neuroimage. 2010 Feb 1;49(3):2352-65. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.026. Epub 2009 Oct 24.
9
A continuous STAPLE for scalar, vector, and tensor images: an application to DTI analysis.一种用于标量、矢量和张量图像的连续钉合算法:在扩散张量成像分析中的应用。
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2009 Jun;28(6):838-46. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2008.2010438. Epub 2008 Dec 9.
10
Combination strategies in multi-atlas image segmentation: application to brain MR data.多图谱图像分割中的组合策略:应用于脑部磁共振数据
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2009 Aug;28(8):1266-77. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2009.2014372. Epub 2009 Feb 18.