利用空间基于主体的模型探索社会经济地位导致的步行差异。
Exploring walking differences by socioeconomic status using a spatial agent-based model.
机构信息
Department of Epidemiology, Center for Social Epidemiology and Population Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA.
出版信息
Health Place. 2012 Jan;18(1):96-9. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2011.08.010.
Abstract
We use an exploratory agent-based model of adults' walking behavior within a city to examine the possible impact of interventions on socioeconomic differences in walking. Simulated results show that for persons of low socioeconomic status, increases in walking resulting from increases in their positive attitude towards walking may diminish over time if other features of the environment are not conducive to walking. Similarly, improving the safety level for the lower SES neighborhoods may be effective in increasing walking, however, the magnitude of its effectiveness varies by levels of land use mix, such that effects of safety are greatest when persons live in areas with a large mix of uses.
摘要
我们使用一个成人城市步行行为的探索性基于代理的模型来研究干预措施对步行的社会经济差异可能产生的影响。模拟结果表明，对于社会经济地位较低的人来说，如果环境的其他特征不利于步行，那么他们对步行的积极态度所带来的步行增加可能会随着时间的推移而减少。同样，提高较低社会经济地位社区的安全水平可能对增加步行有效，但这种效果的幅度因土地利用组合水平而异，当人们生活在用途多样化的地区时，安全的效果最大。
相似文献
1
Exploring walking differences by socioeconomic status using a spatial agent-based model.
Health Place. 2012 Jan;18(1):96-9. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2011.08.010.
2
Do relationships between environmental attributes and recreational walking vary according to area-level socioeconomic status?
J Urban Health. 2015 Apr;92(2):253-64. doi: 10.1007/s11524-014-9932-1.
3
A spatial agent-based model for the simulation of adults' daily walking within a city.
Am J Prev Med. 2011 Mar;40(3):353-61. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.11.017.
4
Socioeconomic status differences in recreational physical activity levels and real and perceived access to a supportive physical environment.
Prev Med. 2002 Dec;35(6):601-11. doi: 10.1006/pmed.2002.1115.
5
Neighborhood Built Environment and Socioeconomic Status are Associated with Active Commuting and Sedentary Behavior, but not with Leisure-Time Physical Activity, in University Students.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Aug 31;16(17):3176. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16173176.
6
Can good neighbourhood perception magnify the positive effect of favourable built environment on recreational walking in China?
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jul 29;24(1):2035. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19539-x.
7
The Association between Belgian Older Adults' Physical Functioning and Physical Activity: What Is the Moderating Role of the Physical Environment?
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 12;11(2):e0148398. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148398. eCollection 2016.
8
Explaining socio-economic status differences in walking for transport: an ecological analysis of individual, social and environmental factors.
Soc Sci Med. 2009 Mar;68(6):1013-20. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.01.008. Epub 2009 Feb 3.
9
Socioeconomic status and perceptions of access and safety for physical activity.
Ann Behav Med. 2004 Aug;28(1):20-8. doi: 10.1207/s15324796abm2801_4.
10
Utilitarian walking, neighborhood environment, and risk of outdoor falls among older adults.
Am J Public Health. 2014 Sep;104(9):e30-7. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302104. Epub 2014 Jul 17.
引用本文的文献
1
Surrounding Residential Greenness and Health: Associations With Abdominal Obesity and Dyslipidemia. A Meta-Analysis of Cross-Sectional Studies.
Public Health Rev. 2025 Feb 18;46:1608163. doi: 10.3389/phrs.2025.1608163. eCollection 2025.
2
A scoping review of systems approaches for increasing physical activity in populations.
Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 Sep 29;20(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00906-2.
3
A systems thinking approach to understanding youth active recreation.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2022 May 12;19(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12966-022-01292-2.
4
Walking for transportation in large Latin American cities: walking-only trips and total walking events and their sociodemographic correlates.
Transp Rev. 2022 May 4;42(3):296-317. doi: 10.1080/01441647.2021.1966552. Epub 2021 Aug 14.
5
How can an agent-based model explore the impact of interventions on children's physical activity in an urban environment?
Health Place. 2021 Nov;72:102688. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2021.102688. Epub 2021 Oct 7.
6
From causal loop diagrams to future scenarios: Using the cross-impact balance method to augment understanding of urban health in Latin America.
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Aug;282:114157. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114157. Epub 2021 Jun 21.
7
The dynamics of food shopping behavior: Exploring travel patterns in low-income Detroit neighborhoods experiencing extreme disinvestment using agent-based modeling.
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 21;15(12):e0243501. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243501. eCollection 2020.
8
A scoping review of simulation modeling in built environment and physical activity research: Current status, gaps, and future directions for improving translation.
Health Place. 2019 May;57:122-130. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2019.04.001. Epub 2019 Apr 24.
9
Examining the Walking Accessibility, Willingness, and Travel Conditions of Residents in Saudi Cities.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Feb 14;16(4):545. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16040545.
10
The impact of individual and environmental interventions on income inequalities in sports participation: explorations with an agent-based model.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018 Nov 1;15(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12966-018-0740-y.
本文引用的文献
1
A spatial agent-based model for the simulation of adults' daily walking within a city.
Am J Prev Med. 2011 Mar;40(3):353-61. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.11.017.
2
Causal thinking and complex system approaches in epidemiology.
Int J Epidemiol. 2010 Feb;39(1):97-106. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyp296. Epub 2009 Oct 9.
3
Explaining socio-economic status differences in walking for transport: an ecological analysis of individual, social and environmental factors.
Soc Sci Med. 2009 Mar;68(6):1013-20. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.01.008. Epub 2009 Feb 3.
4
Socioeconomic differences in lack of recreational walking among older adults: the role of neighbourhood and individual factors.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2009 Jan 5;6:1. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-6-1.
5
Long-term effectiveness of interventions promoting physical activity: a systematic review.
Prev Med. 2008 Oct;47(4):354-68. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.07.006. Epub 2008 Jul 15.
6
Socioeconomic inequalities in health in 22 European countries.
N Engl J Med. 2008 Jun 5;358(23):2468-81. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa0707519.
7
A new tool for epidemiology: the usefulness of dynamic-agent models in understanding place effects on health.
Am J Epidemiol. 2008 Jul 1;168(1):1-8. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwn118. Epub 2008 May 13.
8
Prevalence of transportation and leisure walking among U.S. adults.
Prev Med. 2008 Sep;47(3):329-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.02.018. Epub 2008 Mar 10.
9
Personal, social and environmental determinants of educational inequalities in walking: a multilevel study.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007 Feb;61(2):108-14. doi: 10.1136/jech.2006.048520.
10
Walking to public transit: steps to help meet physical activity recommendations.
Am J Prev Med. 2005 Nov;29(4):273-80. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.06.010.
Zotero 插件