• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

性犯罪者治疗干预和进展量表(SOTIPS):与静态-99R 的心理测量特性和增量预测效度。

The sex offender treatment intervention and progress scale (SOTIPS): psychometric properties and incremental predictive validity with static-99R.

机构信息

Vermont Department of Corrections, Middlebury, VT 05753, USA.

出版信息

Sex Abuse. 2012 Oct;24(5):431-58. doi: 10.1177/1079063211432475. Epub 2012 Feb 24.

DOI:10.1177/1079063211432475
PMID:22368161
Abstract

The Sex Offender Treatment Intervention and Progress Scale (SOTIPS) is a 16-item rating scale designed to assess dynamic risk among adult male sex offenders and degree of change at 6-month intervals during treatment. The purpose of the present study was to examine the psychometric properties of the SOTIPS in a construction sample of 759 adult male sex offenders who were under correctional supervision and enrolled in cognitive-behavioral community treatment in Vermont between 2001 and 2007. The scale showed acceptable interrater reliability. SOTIPS scores at 1, 7, and 13 months after participants began treatment predicted sexual, violent, and any recidivism, and return to prison at fixed 1- and 3-year follow-up periods (AUCs = .60 to .85). Combined SOTIPS and Static-99R scores predicted all recidivism types (AUCs = .67 to .89) and outperformed either instrument alone when both instruments had similar predictive power. Participants who demonstrated treatment progress, as reflected by reductions in SOTIPS scores, showed lower rates of recidivism than those who did not.

摘要

性犯罪者治疗干预和进展量表(SOTIPS)是一个由 16 个项目组成的评定量表,旨在评估成年男性性犯罪者的动态风险,以及在治疗期间每 6 个月的变化程度。本研究的目的是在一个由 759 名成年男性性犯罪者组成的构建样本中,检验 SOTIPS 的心理测量学特性。这些性犯罪者在 2001 年至 2007 年间,处于矫正监督之下,并参加了佛蒙特州的认知行为社区治疗。该量表显示出可接受的评分者间信度。参与者开始治疗后 1、7 和 13 个月的 SOTIPS 得分预测了性犯罪、暴力犯罪和任何再犯,以及在固定的 1 年和 3 年随访期内返回监狱(AUCs =.60 至.85)。SOTIPS 得分和静态-99R 得分的综合预测了所有再犯类型(AUCs =.67 至.89),并且当两个工具都具有相似的预测能力时,优于任何单一工具。与那些没有进展的人相比,那些反映 SOTIPS 得分降低的治疗进展的参与者,再犯率更低。

相似文献

1
The sex offender treatment intervention and progress scale (SOTIPS): psychometric properties and incremental predictive validity with static-99R.性犯罪者治疗干预和进展量表(SOTIPS):与静态-99R 的心理测量特性和增量预测效度。
Sex Abuse. 2012 Oct;24(5):431-58. doi: 10.1177/1079063211432475. Epub 2012 Feb 24.
2
Assessment of dynamic risk factors: an independent validation study of the Violence Risk Scale: Sexual Offender Version.评估动态风险因素:性犯罪者暴力风险量表的独立验证研究。
Sex Abuse. 2010 Jun;22(2):234-51. doi: 10.1177/1079063210369014.
3
The validity and reliability of the Violence Risk Scale-Sexual Offender version: assessing sex offender risk and evaluating therapeutic change.暴力风险量表-性犯罪者版本的有效性和可靠性:评估性犯罪者风险及评估治疗变化
Psychol Assess. 2007 Sep;19(3):318-29. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.19.3.318.
4
Validity and reliability of the Violence Risk Scale-Sexual Offense version in a community sexual offense outpatient setting.在社区性犯罪门诊环境中,性犯罪版暴力风险量表的有效性和可靠性。
Psychol Assess. 2024 Jun-Jul;36(6-7):407-424. doi: 10.1037/pas0001318. Epub 2024 Apr 15.
5
A comparison of the predictive properties of nine sex offender risk assessment instruments.九种性犯罪者风险评估工具的预测性能比较。
Psychol Assess. 2014 Sep;26(3):691-703. doi: 10.1037/a0036616. Epub 2014 Apr 28.
6
Does Reassessment Improve Prediction? A Prospective Study of the Sexual Offender Treatment Intervention and Progress Scale (SOTIPS).重新评估是否能提高预测准确性?性罪犯治疗干预和进展量表(SOTIPS)的前瞻性研究。
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2021 Dec;65(16):1775-1803. doi: 10.1177/0306624X20978204. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
7
How useful are psychometric scores in predicting recidivism for treated sex offenders?心理测量分数在预测已接受治疗的性犯罪者的再犯情况方面有多大用处?
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2012 May;56(3):420-46. doi: 10.1177/0306624X11403125. Epub 2011 Apr 24.
8
General and victim-specific empathy: associations with actuarial risk, treatment outcome, and sexual recidivism.一般共情和受害者共情:与法定风险、治疗效果和性再犯的关系。
Sex Abuse. 2012 Oct;24(5):411-30. doi: 10.1177/1079063211423944. Epub 2011 Dec 16.
9
Predicting recidivism in sex offenders with the Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles (PICTS).使用犯罪思维方式心理量表(PICTS)预测性犯罪者的累犯情况。
Assessment. 2015 Apr;22(2):167-77. doi: 10.1177/1073191114539384. Epub 2014 Jul 9.
10
Development of Vermont assessment of sex offender risk-2 (VASOR-2) reoffense risk scale.开发佛蒙特性犯罪者风险评估-2 (VASOR-2)再犯风险量表。
Sex Abuse. 2014 Jun;26(3):271-90. doi: 10.1177/1079063213486936. Epub 2013 Apr 29.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of testosterone-lowering medication on recidivism in individuals convicted of sexual offenses.降低睾丸激素药物对性犯罪者再犯率的影响。
Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2024;26(1):28-37. doi: 10.1080/19585969.2024.2359923. Epub 2024 Jun 5.
2
Forensic Aftercare Facilities and Their Impact on the Releasability of Persons Who Committed Sexual Offenses: A Three Group Comparison.法医后续照护机构及其对性犯罪者可释放性的影响:三组比较
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2025 Aug;69(10-11):1487-1503. doi: 10.1177/0306624X241246519. Epub 2024 Apr 27.
3
General Criminal Dynamic Risk and Strength Factors Predict Short-Term General Recidivism Outcomes Among People Convicted of Sexual Crime During Community Supervision.
一般犯罪动态风险和强项因素预测在社区监管期间被判性犯罪的人短期一般累犯结果。
Sex Abuse. 2023 Dec;35(8):981-1008. doi: 10.1177/10790632221146499. Epub 2022 Dec 17.
4
Long Term Recidivism Rates Among Individuals at High Risk to Sexually Reoffend.高危性犯罪再犯者的长期累犯率。
Sex Abuse. 2024 Feb;36(1):3-32. doi: 10.1177/10790632221139166. Epub 2022 Nov 16.
5
Understanding the Latent Structure of Dynamic Risk: Seeking Empirical Constraints on Theory Development Using the VRS-SO and the Theory of Dynamic Risk.理解动态风险的潜在结构:利用 VRS-SO 和动态风险理论寻求对理论发展的实证约束。
Sex Abuse. 2022 Mar;34(2):227-254. doi: 10.1177/10790632211002858. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
6
Evaluating Change in Men Who Have Sexually Offended: Linkages to Risk Assessment and Management.评估性犯罪男性的变化:与风险评估和管理的关联。
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2020 Apr 13;22(5):22. doi: 10.1007/s11920-020-01146-3.