• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

向日葵(Helianthus annuus)茎溃疡在澳大利亚揭示了一个致病的Diaporthe(Phomopsis)物种复合体。

Stem cankers on sunflower (Helianthus annuus) in Australia reveal a complex of pathogenic Diaporthe (Phomopsis) species.

机构信息

Agri-Science Queensland, Department of Employment, Economic Development and Innovation, P.O. Box 102, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia; corresponding author e-mail:

出版信息

Persoonia. 2011 Dec;27:80-9. doi: 10.3767/003158511X617110. Epub 2011 Dec 2.

DOI:10.3767/003158511X617110
PMID:22403478
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3251322/
Abstract

The identification of Diaporthe (anamorph Phomopsis) species associated with stem canker of sunflower (Helianthus annuus) in Australia was studied using morphology, DNA sequence analysis and pathology. Phylogenetic analysis revealed three clades that did not correspond with known taxa, and these are believed to represent novel species. Diaporthe gulyae sp. nov. is described for isolates that caused a severe stem canker, specifically pale brown to dark brown, irregularly shaped lesions centred at the stem nodes with pith deterioration and mid-stem lodging. This pathogenicity of D. gulyae was confirmed by satisfying Koch's Postulates. These symptoms are almost identical to those of sunflower stem canker caused by D. helianthi that can cause yield reductions of up to 40 % in Europe and the USA, although it has not been found in Australia. We show that there has been broad misapplication of the name D. helianthi to many isolates of Diaporthe (Phomopsis) found causing, or associated with, stem cankers on sunflower. In GenBank, a number of isolates had been identified as D. helianthi, which were accommodated in several clades by molecular phylogenetic analysis. Two less damaging species, D. kochmanii sp. nov. and D. kongii sp. nov., are also described from cankers on sunflower in Australia.

摘要

对与向日葵茎溃疡相关的 Diaporthe(无性型 Phomopsis)种的鉴定进行了研究,使用形态学、DNA 序列分析和病理学方法。系统发育分析揭示了三个不对应于已知分类群的分支,这些分支被认为代表新的物种。Diaporthe gulyae sp. nov. 是为引起严重茎溃疡的分离物而描述的,特别是浅棕色到深棕色,形状不规则,病变位于茎节点中心,髓质恶化和中茎倒伏。D. gulyae 的致病性通过满足科赫假设得到了证实。这些症状与欧洲和美国向日葵茎溃疡引起的 D. helianthi 引起的症状几乎相同,尽管在澳大利亚尚未发现,但已导致产量减少高达 40%。我们表明,已经广泛错误地将 D. helianthi 这个名称应用于许多被发现引起或与向日葵茎溃疡相关的 Diaporthe(Phomopsis)分离物上。在 GenBank 中,许多分离物被鉴定为 D. helianthi,通过分子系统发育分析它们被归入几个分支。还从澳大利亚向日葵的溃疡中描述了两种危害性较小的物种,D. kochmanii sp. nov. 和 D. kongii sp. nov.。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b1d/3251322/f4c5e3a4dc2f/per-27-80-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b1d/3251322/aa0974dccb8e/per-27-80-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b1d/3251322/e028c360bd7d/per-27-80-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b1d/3251322/5560d7cfc313/per-27-80-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b1d/3251322/f4c5e3a4dc2f/per-27-80-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b1d/3251322/aa0974dccb8e/per-27-80-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b1d/3251322/e028c360bd7d/per-27-80-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b1d/3251322/5560d7cfc313/per-27-80-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b1d/3251322/f4c5e3a4dc2f/per-27-80-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Stem cankers on sunflower (Helianthus annuus) in Australia reveal a complex of pathogenic Diaporthe (Phomopsis) species.向日葵(Helianthus annuus)茎溃疡在澳大利亚揭示了一个致病的Diaporthe(Phomopsis)物种复合体。
Persoonia. 2011 Dec;27:80-9. doi: 10.3767/003158511X617110. Epub 2011 Dec 2.
2
First Report of Phomopsis Stem Canker of Sunflower (Helianthus annuus) Caused by Diaporthe gulyae in Canada.加拿大向日葵(Helianthus annuus)上由古利亚间座壳(Diaporthe gulyae)引起的拟茎点霉茎溃疡病的首次报道
Plant Dis. 2015 Jan;99(1):160. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-08-14-0858-PDN.
3
Quantitative PCR Assays Developed for and for Phomopsis Stem Canker Diagnosis and Germplasm Screening in Sunflower ().为 Phomopsis 茎溃疡病的诊断和向日葵种质筛选而开发的和 的定量 PCR 检测方法。
Plant Dis. 2020 Mar;104(3):793-800. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-09-19-1827-RE. Epub 2020 Jan 17.
4
species infecting sunflower () in Russia, with the description of two new species.在俄罗斯感染向日葵的物种,描述了两个新物种。
Mycologia. 2022 May-Jun;114(3):556-574. doi: 10.1080/00275514.2022.2040285. Epub 2022 May 18.
5
Phomopsis Stem Canker: A Reemerging Threat to Sunflower (Helianthus annuus) in the United States.拟茎点霉茎溃疡病:美国向日葵(向日葵属)面临的新出现威胁
Phytopathology. 2015 Jul;105(7):990-7. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-11-14-0336-FI. Epub 2015 Jun 29.
6
Genome-Wide Association Mapping in Sunflower () Reveals Common Loci and Putative Candidate Genes for Resistance to and Causing Phomopsis Stem Canker.向日葵(Helianthus annuus L.)全基因组关联图谱揭示了对和引起叶斑病的抗性的常见位点和潜在候选基因。
Plant Dis. 2023 Mar;107(3):667-674. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-05-22-1209-RE. Epub 2023 Mar 19.
7
Multiple Forms of Resistance to the Phomopsis Stem Canker Pathogens and in Sunflower.向日葵对茎溃疡病原菌和的多种形式的抗性。
Plant Dis. 2024 Jun;108(6):1740-1749. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-03-23-0610-RE. Epub 2024 May 22.
8
Diversity and Aggressiveness of the Species Complex on Sunflower in Serbia.塞尔维亚向日葵种复合体的多样性和侵略性。
Plant Dis. 2024 Sep;108(9):2795-2808. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-01-24-0195-RE. Epub 2024 Sep 5.
9
First Report of Phomopsis Stem Canker of Sunflower in Illinois Caused by Phomopsis helianthi.伊利诺伊州向日葵拟茎点霉茎溃疡病由向日葵拟茎点霉引起的首次报道。
Plant Dis. 2009 Jul;93(7):760. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-93-7-0760A.
10
Polymorphisms in nuclear rDNA and mtDNA reveal the polyphyletic nature of isolates of Phomopsis pathogenic to sunflower and a tight monophyletic clade of defined geographic origin.核糖体DNA(rDNA)和线粒体DNA(mtDNA)的多态性揭示了向日葵拟茎点霉致病分离株的多系性质以及一个具有明确地理起源的紧密单系分支。
Mycol Res. 2004 Apr;108(Pt 4):393-402. doi: 10.1017/s0953756204009372.

引用本文的文献

1
Two new species of (Diaporthaceae, Diaporthales) from in Guizhou Province, China.来自中国贵州省的炭角菌科炭角菌目两个新物种。
MycoKeys. 2025 Sep 1;121:291-310. doi: 10.3897/mycokeys.121.155321. eCollection 2025.
2
sp. nov., a new species associating with sugar beet root rot in Heilongjiang Province, China.新种,一种与中国黑龙江省甜菜根腐病相关的新物种。
Front Microbiol. 2025 Feb 26;16:1453460. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1453460. eCollection 2025.
3
Mycovirome of Diaporthe helianthi and D. gulyae, causal agents of Phomopsis stem canker of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.).

本文引用的文献

1
MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods.MEGA5:用于最大似然法、进化距离法和最大简约法的分子进化遗传学分析。
Mol Biol Evol. 2011 Oct;28(10):2731-9. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msr121. Epub 2011 May 4.
2
Evaluation of foliar fungal endophyte diversity and colonization of medicinal plant Luehea divaricata (Martius et Zuccarini).药用植物大百部叶片内生真菌多样性及其定殖的评价。
Biol Res. 2010;43(4):375-84. Epub 2011 Feb 1.
3
A case for re-inventory of Australia's plant pathogens.
向日葵(Helianthus annuus L.)拟茎点霉茎溃疡病的病原菌——向日葵黑腐皮壳菌和古氏黑腐皮壳菌的真菌病毒组
Virus Res. 2025 Jan;351:199521. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2024.199521. Epub 2024 Dec 31.
4
A Genomic Sequence Resource of GZU-Y2 Causing Leaf Spot Blight in .导致叶斑病的GZU - Y2的基因组序列资源 。 你提供的原文似乎不完整,“in.”后面应该还有具体内容。
J Fungi (Basel). 2024 Sep 3;10(9):630. doi: 10.3390/jof10090630.
5
and , in addition to , may cause Phomopsis cane and leaf spot disease in grapevine.此外,可能会导致葡萄的拟茎点霉枝枯和叶斑病。
Front Plant Sci. 2024 Sep 2;15:1446663. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1446663. eCollection 2024.
6
What are the 100 most cited fungal genera?被引用次数最多的100个真菌属有哪些?
Stud Mycol. 2024 Jul;108:1-411. doi: 10.3114/sim.2024.108.01. Epub 2024 Jul 15.
7
Fungal Endophytes: Discovering What Lies within Some of Canada's Oldest and Most Resilient Grapevines.真菌内生菌:探寻加拿大一些最古老且最具韧性的葡萄藤内部的奥秘。
J Fungi (Basel). 2024 Jan 26;10(2):105. doi: 10.3390/jof10020105.
8
Species on Palms: Molecular Re-Assessment and Species Boundaries Delimitation in the Species Complex.棕榈科植物:物种复合体的分子重新评估与物种界限划定
Microorganisms. 2023 Nov 6;11(11):2717. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11112717.
9
Metabolomics insights into the polyketide-lactones produced by sp. nov., an endophyte of the medicinal plant .从代谢组学角度探讨内生真菌 nov. 产生的聚酮内酯 **解析**:nov. 是拉丁语 novum 的缩写,通常用于命名新物种,在英文中译为“novel”,而在中文中通常译为“nov. ”或“nov. 株”。
Microbiol Spectr. 2023 Dec 12;11(6):e0274323. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02743-23. Epub 2023 Nov 3.
10
Four new endophytic species of (Diaporthaceae, Diaporthales) isolated from Cameroon.从喀麦隆分离出的四个新的内生(间座壳科,间座壳目)物种。
MycoKeys. 2023 Oct 23;99:319-362. doi: 10.3897/mycokeys.99.110043. eCollection 2023.
澳大利亚植物病原体再清查案例
Persoonia. 2010 Dec;25:50-60. doi: 10.3767/003158510X548668. Epub 2010 Dec 1.
4
Morphological and molecular characterization of Phomopsis vaccinii and additional isolates of Phomopsis from blueberry and cranberry in the eastern United States.美国东部蓝莓和蔓越莓上的拟茎点霉和其他拟茎点霉分离物的形态和分子特征。
Mycologia. 2002 May-Jun;94(3):494-504.
5
Primers for mating-type diagnosis in Diaporthe and Phomopsis: their use in teleomorph induction in vitro and biological species definition.用于 Diaporthe 和 Phomopsis 交配型诊断的引物:它们在体外诱导有性型和生物种定义中的应用。
Fungal Biol. 2010 Feb-Mar;114(2-3):255-70. doi: 10.1016/j.funbio.2010.01.007. Epub 2010 Jan 29.
6
Xanthium italicum, Xanthium strumarium and Arctium lappa as new hosts for Diaporthe helianthi.意大利苍耳、猪毛蒿和牛蒡成为旋孢腔菌的新寄主。
Mycopathologia. 2010 Jul;170(1):51-60. doi: 10.1007/s11046-010-9289-2. Epub 2010 Feb 25.
7
Genetic characterization of a novel Phomopsis sp., a putative biocontrol agent for Carthamus lanatus.新型拟盘多毛孢的遗传特征分析,一种潜在的红花生物防治剂。
Mycologia. 2010 Jan-Feb;102(1):54-61. doi: 10.3852/08-198.
8
Molecular Variability Within Diaporthe/Phomopsis helianthi from France.法国黄萎病菌/拟茎点霉属内的分子变异性。
Phytopathology. 2002 Mar;92(3):308-13. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO.2002.92.3.308.
9
Characterisation of Phomopsis spp. associated with die-back of rooibos (Aspalathus linearis) in South Africa.与南非罗布斯塔(Aspalathus linearis)枯萎病相关的拟茎点霉属(Phomopsis spp.)的特征描述。
Stud Mycol. 2006;55:65-74. doi: 10.3114/sim.55.1.65.
10
A coding region in Diaporthe helianthi reveals genetic variability among isolates of different geographic origin.向日葵拟茎点霉中的一个编码区域揭示了不同地理来源分离株之间的遗传变异性。
Mycopathologia. 2004 Jul;158(1):123-30. doi: 10.1023/b:myco.0000038448.60051.6b.