Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Split, Split, Croatia.
Med Sci Monit. 2012 May;18(5):CR271-5. doi: 10.12659/msm.882731.
To evaluate the differences in the existence and size of dead space in patients with and without Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD and non-GERD) expressed through the size of intrapulmonary shunt (QS/QT).
MATERIAL/METHODS: The study enrolled 86 subjects - 43 patients referred for endoscopy because of symptoms of GERD (heartburn, acid regurgitation, dysfagia) and 43 healthy subjects with similar anthropometric characteristics without GERD symptoms. Based on endoscopy findings, patients were classified into the erosive reflux disease (ERD) group and non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) group. Spirometry values, single-breath diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) and intrapulmonary shunt (venous shunt - QS/QT) determined by the oxygen method were measured in all participants.
Statistically significant differences between GERD and non-GERD groups in FVC (p=0.034), FEV1 (p=0.002), FEV1/FVC (p=0.001), and PEF (p=0.001) were observed. There were no statistically significant differences in FEF 25% (p=0.859), FEF 50% (p=0.850), and FEF 75% (p=0.058). Values of DLCO (p=0.006) and DLCO/VA (p=0.001) were significantly lower and QS/QT was significantly higher (p=0.001) in the GERD group than in the non-GERD group. However, in both groups the average values of DLCO and DLCO/VA expressed as a percentage of predictive values were within normal range, while the value of QS/QT in the GERD group showed pathological (6.0%) mean value (normal value ≤ 5.0%). There were no significant differences in respiratory function test results between patients with ERD and NERD.
Our results suggest that microaspiration of stomach contents may cause surfactant damage, development of microatelectasis, and dead space expansion with consequent increase of intrapulmonary (venous) shunt.
通过肺内分流量(QS/QT)大小来评估胃食管反流病(GERD 和非 GERD)患者死腔的存在和大小差异。
材料/方法:该研究纳入了 86 名受试者-43 名因 GERD 症状(烧心、反酸、吞咽困难)而行内镜检查的患者和 43 名无 GERD 症状且具有相似人体测量特征的健康受试者。根据内镜检查结果,将患者分为糜烂性反流病(ERD)组和非糜烂性反流病(NERD)组。所有参与者均测量了肺活量(FVC)、1 秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)、FEV1/FVC(FVC)和呼气峰流速(PEF),以及通过氧法测定的一氧化碳弥散量(DLCO)和肺内分流量(QS/QT)。
GERD 组与非 GERD 组在 FVC(p=0.034)、FEV1(p=0.002)、FEV1/FVC(p=0.001)和 PEF(p=0.001)方面存在统计学显著差异。在 FEF 25%(p=0.859)、FEF 50%(p=0.850)和 FEF 75%(p=0.058)方面无统计学显著差异。与非 GERD 组相比,GERD 组的 DLCO(p=0.006)和 DLCO/VA(p=0.001)值明显较低,QS/QT 值明显较高(p=0.001)。然而,在两组中,DLCO 和 DLCO/VA 的平均预测值均在正常范围内,而 GERD 组的 QS/QT 值则表现出病理性(6.0%)平均值(正常值≤5.0%)。在 ERD 和 NERD 患者之间,呼吸功能测试结果无显著差异。
我们的结果表明,胃内容物的微吸入可能导致表面活性剂损伤、微肺不张的发展和死腔的扩张,从而导致肺内(静脉)分流量增加。