Suppr超能文献

胃食管反流病与肺功能:死腔扩展的潜在作用。

Gastroesophageal reflux disease and pulmonary function: a potential role of the dead space extension.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Split, Split, Croatia.

出版信息

Med Sci Monit. 2012 May;18(5):CR271-5. doi: 10.12659/msm.882731.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the differences in the existence and size of dead space in patients with and without Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD and non-GERD) expressed through the size of intrapulmonary shunt (QS/QT).

MATERIAL/METHODS: The study enrolled 86 subjects - 43 patients referred for endoscopy because of symptoms of GERD (heartburn, acid regurgitation, dysfagia) and 43 healthy subjects with similar anthropometric characteristics without GERD symptoms. Based on endoscopy findings, patients were classified into the erosive reflux disease (ERD) group and non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) group. Spirometry values, single-breath diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) and intrapulmonary shunt (venous shunt - QS/QT) determined by the oxygen method were measured in all participants.

RESULTS

Statistically significant differences between GERD and non-GERD groups in FVC (p=0.034), FEV1 (p=0.002), FEV1/FVC (p=0.001), and PEF (p=0.001) were observed. There were no statistically significant differences in FEF 25% (p=0.859), FEF 50% (p=0.850), and FEF 75% (p=0.058). Values of DLCO (p=0.006) and DLCO/VA (p=0.001) were significantly lower and QS/QT was significantly higher (p=0.001) in the GERD group than in the non-GERD group. However, in both groups the average values of DLCO and DLCO/VA expressed as a percentage of predictive values were within normal range, while the value of QS/QT in the GERD group showed pathological (6.0%) mean value (normal value ≤ 5.0%). There were no significant differences in respiratory function test results between patients with ERD and NERD.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that microaspiration of stomach contents may cause surfactant damage, development of microatelectasis, and dead space expansion with consequent increase of intrapulmonary (venous) shunt.

摘要

背景

通过肺内分流量(QS/QT)大小来评估胃食管反流病(GERD 和非 GERD)患者死腔的存在和大小差异。

材料/方法:该研究纳入了 86 名受试者-43 名因 GERD 症状(烧心、反酸、吞咽困难)而行内镜检查的患者和 43 名无 GERD 症状且具有相似人体测量特征的健康受试者。根据内镜检查结果,将患者分为糜烂性反流病(ERD)组和非糜烂性反流病(NERD)组。所有参与者均测量了肺活量(FVC)、1 秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)、FEV1/FVC(FVC)和呼气峰流速(PEF),以及通过氧法测定的一氧化碳弥散量(DLCO)和肺内分流量(QS/QT)。

结果

GERD 组与非 GERD 组在 FVC(p=0.034)、FEV1(p=0.002)、FEV1/FVC(p=0.001)和 PEF(p=0.001)方面存在统计学显著差异。在 FEF 25%(p=0.859)、FEF 50%(p=0.850)和 FEF 75%(p=0.058)方面无统计学显著差异。与非 GERD 组相比,GERD 组的 DLCO(p=0.006)和 DLCO/VA(p=0.001)值明显较低,QS/QT 值明显较高(p=0.001)。然而,在两组中,DLCO 和 DLCO/VA 的平均预测值均在正常范围内,而 GERD 组的 QS/QT 值则表现出病理性(6.0%)平均值(正常值≤5.0%)。在 ERD 和 NERD 患者之间,呼吸功能测试结果无显著差异。

结论

我们的结果表明,胃内容物的微吸入可能导致表面活性剂损伤、微肺不张的发展和死腔的扩张,从而导致肺内(静脉)分流量增加。

相似文献

2
Study of respiratory disorders in endoscopically negative and positive gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2010 Apr-Jun;16(2):84-9. doi: 10.4103/1319-3767.61233.
3
Lung diffusion capacity in children with respiratory symptoms and untreated GERD.
Med Sci Monit. 2014 May 12;20:774-81. doi: 10.12659/MSM.890336.
5
How many cases of laryngopharyngeal reflux suspected by laryngoscopy are gastroesophageal reflux disease-related?
World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Aug 28;18(32):4363-70. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i32.4363.
9
Cardiac autonomic regulation differentiates reflux disease with and without erosive esophagitis.
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2006 Sep;41(9):1001-6. doi: 10.1080/00365520600575688.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Pulmonary or otolaryngologic extraesophageal manifestations in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Feb 16;2(2):47-9. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v2.i2.47.
2
Validation of the Swedish translation of LPR-HRQL.
Med Sci Monit. 2010 Oct;16(10):CR480-7.
3
The influence of gastroesophageal reflux in the lung: a case-control study.
Respirology. 2010 Jul;15(5):837-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2010.01777.x. Epub 2010 Jun 4.
4
Extraesophageal manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease: real or imagined?
Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2010 Jul;26(4):389-94. doi: 10.1097/MOG.0b013e32833adc8d.
5
Study of respiratory disorders in endoscopically negative and positive gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2010 Apr-Jun;16(2):84-9. doi: 10.4103/1319-3767.61233.
6
Treating silent reflux disease does not improve poorly controlled asthma.
Cleve Clin J Med. 2010 Mar;77(3):155-60. doi: 10.3949/ccjm.77a.09111.
7
Gastroesophageal reflux disease and asthma.
Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2010 Jan;16(1):60-3. doi: 10.1097/MCP.0b013e328332ca2f.
9
Efficacy of esomeprazole for treatment of poorly controlled asthma.
N Engl J Med. 2009 Apr 9;360(15):1487-99. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0806290.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验