School of Population Health, University of Queensland, Herston, Australia.
BMC Public Health. 2012 Jun 13;12:436. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-436.
Mortality statistics are essential for population health assessment. Despite limitations in data availability, Pacific Island Countries are considered to be in epidemiological transition, with non-communicable diseases increasingly contributing to premature adult mortality. To address rapidly changing health profiles, countries would require mortality statistics from routine death registration given their relatively small population sizes.
This paper uses a standard analytical framework to examine death registration systems in Fiji, Kiribati, Nauru, Palau, Solomon Islands, Tonga and Vanuatu.
In all countries, legislation on death registration exists but does not necessarily reflect current practices. Health departments carry the bulk of responsibility for civil registration functions. Medical cause-of-death certificates are completed for at least hospital deaths in all countries. Overall, significantly more information is available than perceived or used. Use is primarily limited by poor understanding, lack of coordination, limited analytical skills, and insufficient technical resources.
Across the region, both registration and statistics systems need strengthening to improve the availability, completeness, and quality of data. Close interaction between health staff and local communities provides a good foundation for further improvements in death reporting. System strengthening activities must include a focus on clear assignment of responsibility, provision of appropriate authority to perform assigned tasks, and fostering ownership of processes and data to ensure sustained improvements. These human elements need to be embedded in a culture of data sharing and use. Lessons from this multi-country exercise would be applicable in other regions afflicted with similar issues of availability and quality of vital statistics.
死亡率统计对于人口健康评估至关重要。尽管数据可用性存在限制,但太平洋岛国被认为处于流行病学转变阶段,非传染性疾病导致成年人过早死亡的比例不断增加。为了应对迅速变化的健康状况,这些国家需要依靠常规死亡登记来提供死亡率统计数据,因为它们的人口规模相对较小。
本文使用标准分析框架来检查斐济、基里巴斯、瑙鲁、帕劳、所罗门群岛、汤加和瓦努阿图的死亡登记系统。
在所有国家,都有关于死亡登记的立法,但不一定反映当前的做法。卫生部承担着公民登记职能的大部分责任。所有国家都至少在医院死亡的情况下填写了死因医学证明书。总的来说,可获得的信息远远超过了人们的认知或使用程度。使用率主要受到理解程度差、缺乏协调、分析技能有限和技术资源不足的限制。
在整个地区,登记和统计系统都需要加强,以提高数据的可用性、完整性和质量。卫生工作人员与当地社区之间的密切互动为进一步改善死亡报告提供了良好的基础。系统强化活动必须注重明确责任分配、为履行指定任务提供适当的授权,并培养对流程和数据的所有权,以确保持续改进。这些人为因素需要嵌入数据共享和使用的文化中。从这项多国家实践中吸取的经验教训将适用于其他面临类似生命统计数据可用性和质量问题的地区。