Suppr超能文献

优化基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱分析用于细菌鉴定。

Optimization of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry analysis for bacterial identification.

机构信息

ARUP Laboratories, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 2012 Dec;50(12):3845-52. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00626-12. Epub 2012 Sep 19.

Abstract

Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) is a relatively new addition to the clinical microbiology laboratory. The performance of the MALDI Biotyper system (Bruker Daltonics) was compared to those of phenotypic and genotypic identification methods for 690 routine and referred clinical isolates representing 102 genera and 225 unique species. We systematically compared direct-smear and extraction methods on a taxonomically diverse collection of isolates. The optimal score thresholds for bacterial identification were determined, and an approach to address multiple divergent results above these thresholds was evaluated. Analysis of identification scores revealed optimal species- and genus-level identification thresholds of 1.9 and 1.7, with 91.9% and 97.0% of isolates correctly identified to species and genus levels, respectively. Not surprisingly, routinely encountered isolates showed higher concordance than did uncommon isolates. The extraction method yielded higher scores than the direct-smear method for 78.3% of isolates. Incorrect species were reported in the top 10 results for 19.4% of isolates, and although there was no obvious cutoff to eliminate all of these ambiguities, a 10% score differential between the top match and additional species may be useful to limit the need for additional testing to reach single-species-level identifications.

摘要

基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱(MALDI-TOF MS)是临床微生物学实验室的一项相对较新的技术。我们将 MALDI Biotyper 系统(布鲁克·道尔顿公司)的性能与表型和基因型鉴定方法进行了比较,这些方法用于鉴定 690 例常规和参考临床分离株,这些分离株代表了 102 个属和 225 个独特的种。我们系统地比较了直接涂片和提取方法在分类多样化的分离株上的性能。确定了用于细菌鉴定的最佳评分阈值,并评估了处理这些阈值以上的多个不同结果的方法。分析鉴定评分结果显示,细菌鉴定的最佳种和属水平的鉴定阈值分别为 1.9 和 1.7,91.9%和 97.0%的分离株分别能准确鉴定到种和属水平。毫不奇怪,常规遇到的分离株比罕见的分离株具有更高的一致性。对于 78.3%的分离株,提取方法比直接涂片方法产生更高的评分。19.4%的分离株在前十位结果中报告了错误的种,尽管没有明显的截止值可以消除所有这些歧义,但将顶级匹配与其他种之间的评分差异设置为 10%可能有助于限制需要进行额外的测试来达到单种水平的鉴定。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验