Suppr超能文献

基于口腔液的 HIV 快速检测的 HIV 自我检测的准确性和用户可接受性。

Accuracy and user-acceptability of HIV self-testing using an oral fluid-based HIV rapid test.

机构信息

Department of Infectious Disease, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e45168. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045168. Epub 2012 Sep 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The United States FDA approved an over-the-counter HIV self-test, to facilitate increased HIV testing and earlier linkage to care. We assessed the accuracy of self-testing by untrained participants compared to healthcare worker (HCW) testing, participants' ability to interpret sample results and user-acceptability of self-tests in Singapore.

METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: A cross-sectional study, involving 200 known HIV-positive patients and 794 unknown HIV status at-risk participants was conducted. Participants (all without prior self-test experience) performed self-testing guided solely by visual instructions, followed by HCW testing, both using the OraQuick ADVANCE Rapid HIV 1/2 Antibody Test, with both results interpreted by the HCW. To assess ability to interpret results, participants were provided 3 sample results (positive, negative, and invalid) to interpret. Of 192 participants who tested positive on HCW testing, self-testing was positive in 186 (96.9%), negative in 5 (2.6%), and invalid in 1 (0.5%). Of 794 participants who tested negative on HCW testing, self-testing was negative in 791 (99.6%), positive in 1 (0.1%), and invalid in 2 (0.3%). Excluding invalid tests, self-testing had sensitivity of 97.4% (95% CI 95.1% to 99.7%) and specificity of 99.9% (95% CI: 99.6% to 100%). When interpreting results, 96%, 93.1% and 95.2% correctly read the positive, negative and invalid respectively. There were no significant demographic predictors for false negative self-testing or wrongly interpreting positive or invalid sample results as negative. Eighty-seven percent would purchase the kit over-the-counter; 89% preferred to take HIV tests in private. 72.5% and 74.9% felt the need for pre- and post-test counseling respectively. Only 28% would pay at least USD15 for the test.

CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Self-testing was associated with high specificity, and a small but significant number of false negatives. Incorrectly identifying model results as invalid was a major reason for incorrect result interpretation. Survey responses were supportive of making self-testing available.

摘要

背景

美国 FDA 批准了一种非处方 HIV 自检试剂,以促进更多的 HIV 检测和更早地进行治疗。我们评估了未经培训的参与者与医疗保健工作者(HCW)检测相比进行自我检测的准确性,参与者解读样本结果的能力以及新加坡对自我检测的用户接受程度。

方法/主要发现:进行了一项横断面研究,涉及 200 名已知 HIV 阳性患者和 794 名 HIV 状态未知的高危参与者。参与者(均无事先自我检测经验)仅根据视觉说明进行自我检测,随后由 HCW 使用 OraQuick ADVANCE 快速 HIV 1/2 抗体检测进行检测,均由 HCW 解读结果。为了评估解读结果的能力,向参与者提供了 3 个样本结果(阳性、阴性和无效)供其解读。在接受 HCW 检测呈阳性的 192 名参与者中,自我检测呈阳性的有 186 名(96.9%),呈阴性的有 5 名(2.6%),无效的有 1 名(0.5%)。在接受 HCW 检测呈阴性的 794 名参与者中,自我检测呈阴性的有 791 名(99.6%),阳性的有 1 名(0.1%),无效的有 2 名(0.3%)。排除无效测试,自我检测的灵敏度为 97.4%(95%CI 95.1%至 99.7%),特异性为 99.9%(95%CI:99.6%至 100%)。在解读结果时,96%、93.1%和 95.2%分别正确解读了阳性、阴性和无效结果。自我检测出现假阴性或错误解读阳性或无效样本结果为阴性的结果与任何特定的人口统计学特征无关。87%的人会在柜台购买该检测包;89%的人更喜欢私下进行 HIV 检测。72.5%和 74.9%的人分别认为需要进行检测前和检测后咨询。只有 28%的人愿意至少支付 15 美元用于检测。

结论/意义:自我检测具有高度的特异性,且存在少量但显著的假阴性。错误地将模型结果识别为无效是错误解读结果的主要原因。调查结果支持提供自我检测。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

2
HIV self-testing in cis women in Canada: The GetaKit study.加拿大顺性别女性中的艾滋病毒自我检测:GetaKit研究。
Womens Health (Lond). 2025 Jan-Dec;21:17455057251322810. doi: 10.1177/17455057251322810. Epub 2025 Mar 31.

本文引用的文献

3
Prevention of HIV-1 infection with early antiretroviral therapy.早期抗逆转录病毒疗法预防 HIV-1 感染。
N Engl J Med. 2011 Aug 11;365(6):493-505. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1105243. Epub 2011 Jul 18.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验