Institute for Sport and Health, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Clin Interv Aging. 2013;8:19-27. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S36514. Epub 2013 Jan 10.
The primary purpose of this study was to compare the effects of two different exercise training programs on executive cognitive functions and functional mobility in older adults. A secondary purpose was to explore the potential mediators of training effects on executive function and functional mobility with particular reference to physical fitness gains.
A sample of 42 healthy community dwelling adults aged 65 to 75 years participated twice weekly for 3 months in either: (1) multicomponent training, prioritizing neuromuscular coordination, balance, agility, and cognitive executive control; or (2) progressive resistance training for strength conditioning. Participants were tested at baseline (T(1)), following a 4-week control period (T(2)), and finally at postintervention (T(3)) for executive function (inhibition and cognitive flexibility) and functional mobility (maximal walking speed with and without additional task requirements). Cardiorespiratory and muscular fitness were also assessed as potential mediators.
Indices of inhibition, the functions involved in the deliberate withholding of prepotent or automatic responses, and measures of functional mobility improved after the intervention, independent of training type. Mediation analysis suggested that different mechanisms underlie the effects of multicomponent and progressive resistance training. While multicomponent training seemed to directly affect inhibitory capacity, resistance training seemed to affect it indirectly through gains in muscular strength. Physical fitness and executive function variables did not mediate functional mobility changes.
These results confirm that physical training benefits executive function and suggest that different training types might lead to such benefits through different pathways. Both types of training also promoted functional mobility in older adulthood; however, neither inhibitory capacity, nor muscular strength gains seemed to explain functional mobility outcomes.
本研究的主要目的是比较两种不同的运动训练方案对老年人执行认知功能和功能性移动能力的影响。次要目的是探讨训练对执行功能和功能性移动能力的潜在影响因素,特别是与体能收益相关的因素。
本研究选取了 42 名年龄在 65 至 75 岁之间的健康社区居住成年人,他们每周接受两次训练,持续 3 个月,训练方案包括:(1)多成分训练,重点是神经肌肉协调性、平衡、敏捷性和认知执行控制;或(2)渐进式抗阻训练,用于力量调节。参与者在基线(T1)、4 周对照期(T2)后以及最后在干预后(T3)进行执行功能(抑制和认知灵活性)和功能性移动能力(最大步行速度,有无额外任务要求)测试。心肺和肌肉健康也被评估为潜在的中介因素。
抑制指数,即涉及有意抑制优势或自动反应的功能,以及功能性移动能力的指标,在干预后都有所改善,且与训练类型无关。中介分析表明,多成分训练和渐进式抗阻训练的效果存在不同的机制。多成分训练似乎直接影响抑制能力,而抗阻训练则通过肌肉力量的增加间接影响它。体能和执行功能变量不能解释功能性移动能力的变化。
这些结果证实了身体训练对执行功能有益,并表明不同的训练类型可能通过不同的途径产生这种益处。两种类型的训练都促进了老年人的功能性移动能力;然而,无论是抑制能力还是肌肉力量的增加都似乎不能解释功能性移动能力的结果。