School of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294-0009, United States.
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Sep;58:70-4. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.04.019. Epub 2013 Apr 30.
Increasing rates of distraction-related motor vehicle collisions (MVCs) continue to raise concerns regarding driving safety. This study sought to evaluate a novel driving-related distraction, driving with a pet, as a risk factor for MVCs among older, community dwelling adults. Two thousand licensed drivers aged 70 and older were identified, of whom 691 reported pet ownership. Comparing pet owners who did and did not drive with their pets, neither overall MVC rates (rate ratio [RR] 0.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.75-1.26) nor at-fault MVC rates (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.57-1.24) were elevated. However, those who reported always driving with a pet in the vehicle had an elevated MVC rate (RR 1.89, 95% CI 1.10-3.25), as compared to those who did not drive with a pet. The MVC rate was not increased for those reporting only sometimes or rarely driving with a pet in the vehicle. The current study demonstrates an increased risk of MVC involvement in those older drivers who always take a pet with them when they drive a vehicle. When confronted with an increased cognitive or physical workload while driving, elderly drivers in prior studies have exhibited slower cognitive performance and delayed response times in comparison to younger age groups. Further study of pet-related distracted driving behaviors among older drivers as well as younger populations with respect to driver safety and performance is warranted to appropriately inform the need for policy regulation on this issue.
与驾驶相关的分心行为(如开车时与宠物互动)导致的机动车碰撞(MVC)发生率不断上升,这使得人们对驾驶安全的担忧持续加剧。本研究旨在评估一种新的与驾驶相关的分心行为,即开车时携带宠物,是否会成为老年社区居民发生 MVC 的危险因素。研究共确定了 2000 名 70 岁及以上的有驾照的驾驶员,其中 691 名报告拥有宠物。在比较了开车带宠物和不开车带宠物的宠物主人后,发现总体 MVC 发生率(率比 [RR] 0.97,95%置信区间 [CI] 0.75-1.26)和过失 MVC 发生率(RR 0.84,95% CI 0.57-1.24)均无显著升高。然而,与那些不驾车带宠物的人相比,那些报告总是开车带宠物的人发生 MVC 的风险更高(RR 1.89,95% CI 1.10-3.25)。那些只偶尔或很少开车带宠物的人,MVC 发生率并没有增加。当前的研究表明,对于那些总是在开车时带宠物的老年司机来说,他们发生 MVC 的风险增加了。当在驾驶过程中遇到认知或身体负荷增加的情况时,与年轻年龄组相比,老年司机在之前的研究中表现出较慢的认知表现和延迟的反应时间。为了适当了解有关这一问题的政策法规制定的必要性,有必要进一步研究老年司机以及年轻人群中与宠物相关的分心驾驶行为,以了解其对驾驶安全和性能的影响。