• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A collateral effect of reward predicted by matching theory.匹配理论所预测的奖励的附带效应。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1990 Summer;23(2):197-205. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1990.23-197.
2
Impulsivity in students with serious emotional disturbance: the interactive effects of reinforcer rate, delay, and quality.患有严重情绪障碍的学生的冲动性:强化物频率、延迟和质量的交互作用。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1993 Spring;26(1):37-52. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1993.26-37.
3
Effects of problem difficulty and reinforcer quality on time allocated to concurrent arithmetic problems.问题难度和强化物质量对分配给并发算术问题的时间的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1996 Spring;29(1):11-24. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-11.
4
Response allocation to concurrent fixed-ratio reinforcement schedules with work requirements by adults with mental retardation and typical preschool children.智障成年人和典型学龄前儿童对具有工作要求的并发固定比率强化程序的反应分配。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1998 Spring;31(1):43-63. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1998.31-43.
5
Self-instructional training: cognitive behavior modification for remediating arithmetic deficits.
Except Child. 1983 Sep;50(1):54-60. doi: 10.1177/001440298305000107.
6
The effects of variable-interval reinforcement on academic engagement: a demonstration of matching theory.可变间隔强化对学业参与度的影响:匹配理论的实证
J Appl Behav Anal. 1992 Spring;25(1):143-51. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1992.25-143.
7
Comparison of reinforcement schedules in the reduction of stereotypy with supported routines.在采用支持性常规方法减少刻板行为方面强化程序的比较。
Res Dev Disabil. 1998 Mar-Apr;19(2):99-122. doi: 10.1016/s0891-4222(97)00045-0.
8
Too much reinforcement, too little behavior: assessing task interspersal procedures in conjunction with different reinforcement schedules with autistic children.强化过多,行为过少:结合不同强化时间表评估自闭症儿童的任务穿插程序。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1992 Winter;25(4):795-808. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1992.25-795.
9
Reinforcer variation: implications for motivating developmentally disabled children.强化物变化:对激励发育障碍儿童的启示
J Appl Behav Anal. 1981 Fall;14(3):345-50. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1981.14-345.
10
The use of response deprivation to increase the academic performance of EMR students.运用反应剥夺来提高电子病历学生的学业成绩。
Appl Res Ment Retard. 1985;6(1):15-31. doi: 10.1016/s0270-3092(85)80019-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Human sensitivity to reinforcement: A comment on Kollins, Newland, and Critchfield's (1997) quantitative literature review.人类对强化的敏感性:对科林斯、纽兰和克里奇菲尔德(1997年)定量文献综述的评论。
Behav Anal. 1999 Spring;22(1):35-41. doi: 10.1007/BF03391976.
2
Trends in the measurement of social validity.社会效度测量的趋势。
Behav Anal. 1992 Fall;15(2):147-56. doi: 10.1007/BF03392597.
3
An investigation of differential reinforcement of alternative behavior without extinction.对替代行为的差别强化而无消退的研究。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2010 Winter;43(4):569-89. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2010.43-569.
4
Human sensitivity to reinforcement in operant choice: How much do consequences matter?人类在操作性选择中对强化的敏感性:后果有多重要?
Psychon Bull Rev. 1997 Jun;4(2):208-20. doi: 10.3758/BF03209395.
5
Sensitivity and bias under conditions of equal and unequal academic task difficulty.在学术任务难度相等和不相等的情况下的敏感性与偏差。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2008 Spring;41(1):39-52. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2008.41-39.
6
An application of the matching law to social dynamics.匹配法则在社会动态中的应用。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2007 Winter;40(4):589-601. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2007.589-601.
7
Basic research needed for stimulating the development of behavioral technologies.刺激行为技术发展的基础研究。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1994 May;61(3):529-50. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1994.61-529.
8
Application of Herrnstein's hyperbola to time allocation of naturalistic human behavior maintained by naturalistic social reinforcement.赫尔斯特恩双曲线在维持于自然社会强化的自然主义人类行为的时间分配中的应用。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1992 Mar;57(2):177-85. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1992.57-177.
9
The paradox of preference for unreliable reinforcement: The role of context and conditioned reinforcement.偏好不可靠强化物的矛盾:情境和条件强化的作用。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1995 Fall;28(3):389-94. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1995.28-389.
10
The applied importance of research on the matching law.研究匹配律的应用重要性。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1995 Summer;28(2):237-41. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1995.28-237.

本文引用的文献

1
Quantitative analysis.定量分析。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1984 Nov;42(3):421-34. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1984.42-421.
2
Maximizing and matching on concurrent ratio schedules.最大化并匹配同时比率时间表。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1975 Jul;24(1):107-16. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1975.24-107.
3
On the law of effect.关于效果律。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Mar;13(2):243-66. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.13-243.
4
Practical implications of the matching law.匹配定律的实际意义。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1984 Fall;17(3):367-80. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1984.17-367.
5
Compliance training and behavioral covariation in the treatment of multiple behavior problems.多重行为问题治疗中的依从性训练与行为共变
J Appl Behav Anal. 1981 Fall;14(3):209-22. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1981.14-209.
6
The negative side effects of reward.奖励的负面效应
J Appl Behav Anal. 1983 Fall;16(3):283-96. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1983.16-283.
7
Comments on the applied relevance of the matching law.关于匹配定律应用相关性的评论。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1984 Fall;17(3):381-6. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1984.17-381.
8
Experimental analysis of response covariation among compliant and inappropriate behaviors.顺应行为和不适当行为之间反应协变的实验分析。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1986 Fall;19(3):241-54. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1986.19-241.

匹配理论所预测的奖励的附带效应。

A collateral effect of reward predicted by matching theory.

作者信息

Mace F C, McCurdy B, Quigley E A

机构信息

Graduate School of Applied Psychology, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854-0819.

出版信息

J Appl Behav Anal. 1990 Summer;23(2):197-205. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1990.23-197.

DOI:10.1901/jaba.1990.23-197
PMID:2373655
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1286225/
Abstract

Matching theory describes a process by which organisms distribute their behavior between two or more concurrent schedules of reinforcement (Herrnstein, 1961). In an attempt to determine the generality of matching theory to applied settings, 2 students receiving special education were provided with academic response alternatives. Using a combined simultaneous treatments design and reversal design, unequal ratio schedules of reinforcement were varied across two academic responses. Findings indicated that both subjects allocated higher rates of responses to the richer schedule of reinforcement, although only one responded exclusively to the richer schedule. The present results lend support to a postulation that positive reinforcement may have undesirable collateral effects that are predicted by matching theory (Balsam & Bondy, 1983).

摘要

匹配理论描述了生物体在两个或多个并发强化程序之间分配其行为的过程(赫尔恩斯坦,1961年)。为了确定匹配理论在应用环境中的普遍性,为2名接受特殊教育的学生提供了学业反应选择。采用同时处理设计和反转设计相结合的方法,对两种学业反应采用不等比例强化程序。结果表明,尽管只有一名受试者完全对更丰富的强化程序做出反应,但两名受试者都将更高比例的反应分配给了更丰富的强化程序。目前的结果支持了一种假设,即正强化可能会产生匹配理论所预测的不良附带效应(巴尔萨姆和邦迪,1983年)。