• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Patient health information materials in waiting rooms of family physicians: do patients care?家庭医生候诊室中的患者健康信息材料:患者会在意吗?
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2013 Jun 4;7:489-97. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S45777. Print 2013.
2
Women's knowledge of taking oral contraceptive pills correctly and of emergency contraception: effect of providing information leaflets in general practice.女性对正确服用口服避孕药及紧急避孕的认知:在全科医疗中提供信息传单的效果
Br J Gen Pract. 1995 Aug;45(397):409-14.
3
Impact of information leaflets on behavior of patients with gastroenteritis or tonsillitis: a cluster randomized trial in French primary care.信息传单对肠胃炎或扁桃体炎患者行为的影响:法国初级保健中的一项集群随机试验。
J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Jan;28(1):25-31. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2164-8. Epub 2012 Jul 25.
4
A survey of the quality of information leaflets on hayfever available from general practices and community pharmacies.一项关于从全科医疗诊所和社区药房获取的花粉热信息传单质量的调查。
Clin Exp Allergy. 2004 Sep;34(9):1438-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2004.02055.x.
5
A survey of primary care patients' readiness to engage in the de-adoption practices recommended by Choosing Wisely Canada.一项关于初级保健患者参与加拿大明智选择运动所推荐的弃用医疗行为的意愿的调查。
BMC Res Notes. 2016 Jun 10;9:301. doi: 10.1186/s13104-016-2103-6.
6
Promoting chlamydia screening with posters and leaflets in general practice--a qualitative study.在全科医疗中使用海报和传单推广衣原体筛查——一项定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2009 Oct 12;9:383. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-383.
7
Survey of outpatients' use and needs of patient medicine information leaflets in Thailand.泰国门诊患者对患者用药信息手册的使用情况及需求调查。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2019 Feb;41(1):141-150. doi: 10.1007/s11096-018-0748-z. Epub 2018 Nov 16.
8
Costs and difficulties of recruiting patients to provide e-health support: pilot study in one primary care trust.招募患者提供电子健康支持的成本和困难:在一个初级保健信托基金中的试点研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012 Mar 29;12:25. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-25.
9
Do women read poster displays on breast cancer in waiting rooms?女性会在候诊室阅读关于乳腺癌的海报展示吗?
J Public Health (Oxf). 2004 Dec;26(4):355-8. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdh178.
10
The benefits of prescription information leaflets (1).处方信息单页的益处(1)
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1989 Jun;27(6):723-39. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1989.tb03434.x.

引用本文的文献

1
How do patient information documents present dialysis and conservative kidney management? A document analysis.患者信息文件如何呈现透析和保守肾脏管理?一项文献分析。
Clin Kidney J. 2025 May 12;18(6):sfaf136. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfaf136. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Heat Illness and Extreme Weather Health Literacy: Communication Preferences and Effectiveness for Patients Living in Climate-Change-Vulnerable Communities.热疾病与极端天气健康素养:气候变化脆弱社区患者的沟通偏好与效果
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Mar 14;22(3):434. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22030434.
3
Patient leaflets on respiratory tract infections did not improve shared decision making and antibiotic prescriptions in a low-prescriber setting.呼吸道感染患者手册并未改善低处方环境下的共同决策和抗生素处方。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 29;14(1):4978. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-55166-7.
4
Effectiveness of educational materials on levels of knowledge of thyroid associated orbitopathy in an endocrinology clinic.内分泌诊所中教育材料对甲状腺相关性眼病知识水平的影响。
PEC Innov. 2023 Oct 1;3:100225. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100225. eCollection 2023 Dec 15.
5
Do health service waiting areas contribute to the health literacy of consumers? A scoping review.卫生服务等候区是否有助于提高消费者的健康素养? 一项范围综述。
Health Promot Int. 2023 Aug 1;38(4). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daad046.
6
An exploration of the self-perceived nutrition competencies of pharmacists.药剂师自我认知的营养能力探索。
Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2022 Nov 23;8:100203. doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2022.100203. eCollection 2022 Dec.
7
The co-development of personalised 10-year breast cancer risk communications: a 'think-aloud' study.个性化 10 年乳腺癌风险沟通的共同制定:一项“出声思考”研究。
BMC Cancer. 2022 Dec 5;22(1):1264. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-10347-3.
8
Improving Health Literacy Responsiveness: A Randomized Study on the Uptake of Brochures on Doctor-Patient Communication in Primary Health Care Waiting Rooms.提高健康素养响应能力:在初级医疗保健候诊室中使用医患沟通手册的随机研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 10;18(9):5025. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18095025.
9
A Qualitative Investigation of the Acceptability and Feasibility of a Urinary Tract Infection Patient Information Leaflet for Older Adults and Their Carers.一项关于老年患者及其护理人员的尿路感染患者信息手册的可接受性和可行性的定性研究。
Antibiotics (Basel). 2021 Jan 16;10(1):83. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10010083.
10
Acceptance and self-reported use of a dementia care toolbox by general practice personal: results from an intervention study in German practices.全科医生对痴呆症护理工具包的接受度和自我报告使用情况:德国实践中的干预研究结果。
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Dec 9;21(1):264. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01345-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Men's and women's health beliefs differentially predict coronary heart disease incidence in a population-based sample.男女健康信念差异预测基于人群样本的冠心病发病率。
Health Educ Behav. 2013 Apr;40(2):231-9. doi: 10.1177/1090198112449461. Epub 2012 Sep 18.
2
A systematic review of interventions in primary care to improve health literacy for chronic disease behavioral risk factors.系统评价初级保健干预措施,以提高慢性病行为风险因素的健康素养。
BMC Fam Pract. 2012 Jun 1;13:49. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-13-49.
3
Provider views about responsibility for medication adherence and content of physician-older patient discussions.提供者对药物依从性的责任以及医生与老年患者讨论内容的看法。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012 Jun;60(6):1019-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.03969.x. Epub 2012 May 30.
4
Effect of patient education in the management of coronary heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.患者教育对冠心病管理的影响:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2013 Aug;20(4):701-14. doi: 10.1177/2047487312449308. Epub 2012 May 22.
5
A framework for the evaluation of patient information leaflets.患者信息手册评估框架。
Health Expect. 2012 Sep;15(3):283-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00665.x. Epub 2011 Feb 18.
6
Effective teaching strategies and methods of delivery for patient education: a systematic review and practice guideline recommendations.患者教育的有效教学策略与授课方法:一项系统综述及实践指南建议
J Cancer Educ. 2011 Mar;26(1):12-21. doi: 10.1007/s13187-010-0183-x.
7
Educational interventions for patients with heart failure: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.教育干预对心力衰竭患者的影响:一项随机对照试验的系统评价。
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2011 Jul-Aug;26(4):E27-35. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0b013e3181ee5fb2.
8
The development of a health literacy assessment tool for health plans.健康计划的健康素养评估工具的开发。
J Health Commun. 2010;15 Suppl 2:93-101. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2010.499986.
9
Promoting patient empowerment in the healthcare system: highlighting the need for patient-centered drug policy.促进医疗体系中的患者赋权:强调以患者为中心的药物政策的必要性。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2007 Jun;7(3):281-9. doi: 10.1586/14737167.7.3.281.
10
The impact of health literacy on self-monitoring of blood glucose in patients with diabetes receiving care in an inner-city hospital.健康素养对城市内医院中接受护理的糖尿病患者自我血糖监测的影响。
J Natl Med Assoc. 2010 Jan;102(1):5-9. doi: 10.1016/s0027-9684(15)30469-7.

家庭医生候诊室中的患者健康信息材料:患者会在意吗?

Patient health information materials in waiting rooms of family physicians: do patients care?

作者信息

Moerenhout Tania, Borgermans Liesbeth, Schol Sandrina, Vansintejan Johan, Van De Vijver Erwin, Devroey Dirk

机构信息

Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Department of Family Practice, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Patient Prefer Adherence. 2013 Jun 4;7:489-97. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S45777. Print 2013.

DOI:10.2147/PPA.S45777
PMID:23766635
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3678903/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient health information materials (PHIMs), such as leaflets and posters are widely used by family physicians to reinforce or illustrate information, and to remind people of information received previously. This facilitates improved health-related knowledge and self-management by patients.

OBJECTIVE

This study assesses the use of PHIMs by patient. It also addresses their perception of the quality and the impact of PHIMs on the interaction with their physician, along with changes in health-related knowledge and self-management.

METHODS

QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY AMONG PATIENTS OF FAMILY PRACTICES OF ONE TOWN IN BELGIUM, ASSESSING: (1) the extent to which patients read PHIMs in waiting rooms (leaflets and posters) and take them home, (2) the patients' perception of the impact of PHIMs on interaction with their physician, their change in health-related knowledge and self-management, and (3) the patients judgment of the quality of PHIMs.

RESULTS

We included 903 questionnaires taken from ten practices. Ninety-four percent of respondents stated they read PHIMs (leaflets), 45% took the leaflets home, and 78% indicated they understood the content of the leaflets. Nineteen percent of respondents reportedly discussed the content of the leaflets with their physician and 26% indicated that leaflets allowed them to ask fewer questions of their physician. Thirty-four percent indicated that leaflets had previously helped them to improve their health-related knowledge and self-management. Forty-two percent reportedly discussed the content of the leaflets with others. Patient characteristics are of significant influence on the perceived impact of PHIMS in physician interaction, health-related knowledge, and self-management.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that patients value health information materials in the waiting rooms of family physicians and that they perceive such materials as being helpful in improving patient-physician interaction, health-related knowledge, and self-management.

摘要

背景

患者健康信息材料(PHIMs),如传单和海报,被家庭医生广泛用于强化或阐释信息,并提醒人们之前所接收的信息。这有助于患者增进与健康相关的知识并进行自我管理。

目的

本研究评估患者对PHIMs的使用情况。同时探讨患者对PHIMs质量的看法、其对与医生互动的影响,以及与健康相关的知识和自我管理方面的变化。

方法

对比利时一个城镇家庭医疗诊所的患者进行问卷调查,评估:(1)患者在候诊室阅读PHIMs(传单和海报)并带回家的程度;(2)患者对PHIMs对其与医生互动的影响、与健康相关知识和自我管理变化的看法;(3)患者对PHIMs质量的判断。

结果

我们纳入了来自十个诊所的903份问卷。94%的受访者表示他们阅读了PHIMs(传单),45%将传单带回家,78%表示他们理解传单的内容。据报道,19%的受访者与医生讨论了传单的内容,26%表示传单使他们向医生提问的次数减少。34%表示传单此前帮助他们增进了与健康相关的知识并进行自我管理。42%据报道与他人讨论了传单的内容。患者特征对PHIMs在医生互动、与健康相关知识和自我管理方面的感知影响具有显著影响。

结论

本研究表明,患者重视家庭医生候诊室中的健康信息材料,并认为这些材料有助于改善医患互动、增进与健康相关的知识并进行自我管理。