Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Spain ; Spanish Cycling Federation, Madrid, Spain.
PLoS One. 2013 Aug 21;8(8):e70999. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070999. eCollection 2013.
Attitudes towards doping are considered an influence of doping intentions. The aims of the present study were 1) to discover and compare the attitudes towards doping among Spanish national team cyclists from different Olympic disciplines, as well as 2) to get some complementary information that could better explain the context. The sample was comprised of seventy-two cyclists: mean age 19.67±4.72 years; 70.8% males (n = 51); from the different Olympic disciplines of Mountain bike -MTB- (n = 18), Bicycle Moto Cross -BMX- (n = 12), Track -TRA- (n = 9) and Road -ROA- (n = 33). Descriptive design was carried out using a validated scale (PEAS). To complement this, a qualitative open-ended questionnaire was used. Overall mean score (17-102) was 36.12±9.39. For different groups, the data were: MTB: 30.28±6.92; BMX: 42.46±10.74; TRA: 43.22±12.00; ROA: 34.91±6.62, respectively. In relation to overall score, significant differences were observed between MTB and BMX (p = 0.002) and between MTB and TRA (p = 0.003). For the open-ended qualitative questionnaire, the most mentioned word associated with "doping" was "cheating" (48.83% of total sample), with "responsible agents of doping" the word "doctor" (52,77%), and with the "main reason for the initiation in doping" the words "sport achievement" (45.83%). The major proposed solution was "doing more doping controls" (43.05%). Moreover, 48.67% stated that there was "a different treatment between cycling and other sports". This study shows that Spanish national team cyclists from Olympic cycling disciplines, in general, are not tolerant in relation to doping. BMX and Track riders are a little more permissive towards the use of banned substances than MTB and Road. Results from the qualitative open-ended questionnaire showed interesting data in specific questions. These results empower the idea that, apart from maintaining doping controls and making them more efficient, anti-doping education programs are needed from the earliest ages.
对兴奋剂的态度被认为是兴奋剂意图的影响因素。本研究的目的是:1)发现并比较来自不同奥运项目的西班牙国家自行车队运动员对兴奋剂的态度,以及 2)获得一些可以更好地解释背景的补充信息。该样本由 72 名自行车运动员组成:平均年龄 19.67±4.72 岁;男性占 70.8%(n=51);来自不同的奥运项目:山地自行车(MTB)(n=18)、自行车越野赛(BMX)(n=12)、场地自行车(TRA)(n=9)和公路自行车(ROA)(n=33)。使用经过验证的量表(PEAS)进行描述性设计。为了补充这一点,使用了一份开放式定性问卷。总平均得分为(17-102)36.12±9.39。对于不同的群体,数据分别为:MTB:30.28±6.92;BMX:42.46±10.74;TRA:43.22±12.00;ROA:34.91±6.62。关于总分,MTB 和 BMX(p=0.002)以及 MTB 和 TRA(p=0.003)之间存在显著差异。对于开放式定性问卷,与“兴奋剂”相关的提及最多的词是“作弊”(总样本的 48.83%),“兴奋剂的主要责任方”是“医生”(52.77%),“开始使用兴奋剂的主要原因”是“运动成绩”(45.83%)。主要提出的解决方案是“进行更多的兴奋剂检测”(43.05%)。此外,48.67%的人表示“自行车运动和其他运动的待遇不同”。这项研究表明,西班牙国家自行车队的奥运自行车运动员总体上对兴奋剂并不宽容。BMX 和场地自行车运动员对使用禁用物质的宽容度略高于山地自行车和公路自行车运动员。开放式定性问卷的结果显示了特定问题中的有趣数据。这些结果表明,除了保持兴奋剂检测并使其更加有效之外,还需要从最早的年龄开始进行反兴奋剂教育计划。