• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老鼠可以推断出时间的概率模型。

Mice infer probabilistic models for timing.

机构信息

Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Janelia Farm Research Campus, Ashburn, VA 20147.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Oct 15;110(42):17154-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1310666110. Epub 2013 Sep 30.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.1310666110
PMID:24082097
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3801012/
Abstract

Animals learn both whether and when a reward will occur. Neural models of timing posit that animals learn the mean time until reward perturbed by a fixed relative uncertainty. Nonetheless, animals can learn to perform actions for reward even in highly variable natural environments. Optimal inference in the presence of variable information requires probabilistic models, yet it is unclear whether animals can infer such models for reward timing. Here, we develop a behavioral paradigm in which optimal performance required knowledge of the distribution from which reward delays were chosen. We found that mice were able to accurately adjust their behavior to the SD of the reward delay distribution. Importantly, mice were able to flexibly adjust the amount of prior information used for inference according to the moment-by-moment demands of the task. The ability to infer probabilistic models for timing may allow mice to adapt to complex and dynamic natural environments.

摘要

动物既能学习到奖励是否会发生,也能学习到奖励发生的时间。时间推断的神经模型假设动物通过固定的相对不确定性来学习到奖励的平均时间。尽管如此,动物即使在高度变化的自然环境中也能学会为奖励而执行动作。在存在可变信息的情况下进行最优推断需要概率模型,但尚不清楚动物是否能够为奖励时间推断出这样的模型。在这里,我们开发了一种行为范式,其中最优表现需要对从奖励延迟中选择的分布的知识。我们发现,老鼠能够准确地调整自己的行为以适应奖励延迟分布的标准差。重要的是,老鼠能够根据任务的即时需求灵活地调整用于推断的先验信息的数量。推断时间概率模型的能力可能使老鼠能够适应复杂和动态的自然环境。

相似文献

1
Mice infer probabilistic models for timing.老鼠可以推断出时间的概率模型。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Oct 15;110(42):17154-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1310666110. Epub 2013 Sep 30.
2
A neural network model with dopamine-like reinforcement signal that learns a spatial delayed response task.一种具有类似多巴胺强化信号的神经网络模型,用于学习空间延迟反应任务。
Neuroscience. 1999;91(3):871-90. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(98)00697-6.
3
Statistical information about reward timing is insufficient for promoting optimal persistence decisions.关于奖励时机的统计信息不足以促进最佳的坚持决策。
Cognition. 2023 Aug;237:105468. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105468. Epub 2023 May 4.
4
Mice exhibit stochastic and efficient action switching during probabilistic decision making.在进行概率决策时,老鼠表现出随机且有效的动作转换。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Apr 12;119(15):e2113961119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2113961119. Epub 2022 Apr 6.
5
Mice optimize timed decisions about probabilistic outcomes under deadlines.小鼠会在截止日期前优化关于概率性结果的定时决策。
Anim Cogn. 2017 May;20(3):473-484. doi: 10.1007/s10071-017-1073-y. Epub 2017 Jan 19.
6
Tonic or Phasic Stimulation of Dopaminergic Projections to Prefrontal Cortex Causes Mice to Maintain or Deviate from Previously Learned Behavioral Strategies.对前额叶皮层多巴胺能投射的强直或相位刺激使小鼠维持或偏离先前习得的行为策略。
J Neurosci. 2017 Aug 30;37(35):8315-8329. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1221-17.2017. Epub 2017 Jul 24.
7
Enriching behavioral ecology with reinforcement learning methods.用强化学习方法丰富行为生态学。
Behav Processes. 2019 Apr;161:94-100. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2018.01.008. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
8
Neural systems implicated in delayed and probabilistic reinforcement.涉及延迟和概率性强化的神经系统。
Neural Netw. 2006 Oct;19(8):1277-301. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2006.03.004. Epub 2006 Aug 30.
9
A pallidus-habenula-dopamine pathway signals inferred stimulus values.苍白球缰核对多巴胺通路信号推断刺激值。
J Neurophysiol. 2010 Aug;104(2):1068-76. doi: 10.1152/jn.00158.2010. Epub 2010 Jun 10.
10
Mice monitor their timing errors.老鼠会监测它们的时间误差。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 7;14(1):23356. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-71921-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Adaptive reward representations integrate expected uncertainty signals in orbitofrontal cortex.适应性奖励表征整合眶额皮质中的预期不确定性信号。
Sci Adv. 2025 Jul 18;11(29):eadv9590. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adv9590. Epub 2025 Jul 16.
2
Foraging animals use dynamic Bayesian updating to model meta-uncertainty in environment representations.觅食动物利用动态贝叶斯更新来对环境表征中的元不确定性进行建模。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2025 Apr 30;21(4):e1012989. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012989. eCollection 2025 Apr.
3
Rats and mice rapidly update timed behaviors.大鼠和小鼠能快速更新定时行为。
Anim Cogn. 2025 Jan 24;28(1):6. doi: 10.1007/s10071-025-01930-9.
4
Foraging Under Uncertainty Follows the Marginal Value Theorem with Bayesian Updating of Environment Representations.在不确定性下觅食遵循边际价值定理并对环境表征进行贝叶斯更新。
bioRxiv. 2024 Mar 31:2024.03.30.587253. doi: 10.1101/2024.03.30.587253.
5
A Time to Remember: Neural Insights into Rapid Updating of Timed Behaviors.值得铭记的时刻:对定时行为快速更新的神经学见解
Neurosci Bull. 2023 Apr;39(4):699-702. doi: 10.1007/s12264-022-00999-3. Epub 2022 Dec 16.
6
Quantitative properties of the creation and activation of a cell-intrinsic duration-encoding engram.细胞内在持续时间编码记忆痕迹的形成与激活的定量特性。
Front Comput Neurosci. 2022 Nov 3;16:1019812. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2022.1019812. eCollection 2022.
7
Influence of Recent Trial History on Interval Timing.近期试验史对间隔计时的影响。
Neurosci Bull. 2023 Apr;39(4):559-575. doi: 10.1007/s12264-022-00954-2. Epub 2022 Oct 8.
8
Trust-Based Decision-Making in the Health Context Discriminates Biological Risk Profiles in Type 1 Diabetes.健康背景下基于信任的决策会区分1型糖尿病的生物风险特征。
J Pers Med. 2022 Jul 28;12(8):1236. doi: 10.3390/jpm12081236.
9
Rodents monitor their error in self-generated duration on a single trial basis.啮齿动物在单次试验的基础上监测自身产生的持续时间误差。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Mar 1;119(9). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2108850119.
10
Serotonin neurons modulate learning rate through uncertainty.血清素神经元通过不确定性来调节学习率。
Curr Biol. 2022 Feb 7;32(3):586-599.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.12.006. Epub 2021 Dec 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Mice take calculated risks.老鼠会权衡风险。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 May 29;109(22):8776-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1205131109. Epub 2012 May 16.
2
Decision makers calibrate behavioral persistence on the basis of time-interval experience.决策者根据时间间隔的经验来调整行为的持久性。
Cognition. 2012 Aug;124(2):216-26. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.03.008. Epub 2012 Apr 23.
3
Stimulus control in multiple temporal discriminations.多重时间辨别中的刺激控制
Learn Behav. 2012 Dec;40(4):520-9. doi: 10.3758/s13420-012-0071-9.
4
Optimal temporal risk assessment.最佳时间风险评估。
Front Integr Neurosci. 2011 Sep 27;5:56. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2011.00056. eCollection 2011.
5
Bayes and blickets: effects of knowledge on causal induction in children and adults.贝叶斯和布莱基茨:知识对儿童和成人因果推理的影响。
Cogn Sci. 2011 Nov-Dec;35(8):1407-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01203.x. Epub 2011 Oct 4.
6
Predicting the future as Bayesian inference: people combine prior knowledge with observations when estimating duration and extent.贝叶斯推断预测未来:人们在估计持续时间和程度时,会将先验知识与观察结果结合起来。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2011 Nov;140(4):725-43. doi: 10.1037/a0024899.
7
A model of interval timing by neural integration.神经整合的区间定时模型。
J Neurosci. 2011 Jun 22;31(25):9238-53. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3121-10.2011.
8
Behavior and neural basis of near-optimal visual search.近优视觉搜索的行为和神经基础。
Nat Neurosci. 2011 Jun;14(6):783-90. doi: 10.1038/nn.2814. Epub 2011 May 8.
9
How to grow a mind: statistics, structure, and abstraction.如何培养思维:统计、结构与抽象。
Science. 2011 Mar 11;331(6022):1279-85. doi: 10.1126/science.1192788.
10
Time and Associative Learning.时间与联想学习
Comp Cogn Behav Rev. 2010;5:1-22. doi: 10.3819/ccbr.2010.50001.