• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

词汇生成与图词干扰范式:学习的作用。

Word production and the picture-word interference paradigm: the role of learning.

作者信息

Collina Simona, Tabossi Patrizia, De Simone Flavia

机构信息

Università degli Studi Suor Orsola Benincasa, Via Suor Orsola 10, Naples, Italy,

出版信息

J Psycholinguist Res. 2013 Oct;42(5):461-73. doi: 10.1007/s10936-012-9229-z.

DOI:10.1007/s10936-012-9229-z
PMID:23099552
Abstract

Psycholinguistic experiments conducted with the picture-word interference paradigm are typically preceded by a phase during which participants learn the words they will have to produce in the experiment. In Experiment 1, the pictures (e.g., a frog) were to be named and were presented with a categorically related (e.g., cat) or unrelated distracter (e.g., pen). In the related condition responses were slower relative to the unrelated condition for the participants who had gone through the learning phase. In contrast, participants who had not been previously familiarized with the materials showed facilitation. In Experiment 2 one group of participants, as usual, learned to produce the targets upon presentation of the corresponding pictures (e.g., a frog). The other group learned to produce the same targets upon presentation of unrelated pictures (e.g., a clock). They showed very similar semantic effects. The implications of the findings in the study of word production are discussed.

摘要

采用图片-单词干扰范式进行的心理语言学实验通常在一个阶段之前进行,在这个阶段中,参与者学习他们在实验中必须说出的单词。在实验1中,图片(如青蛙)要被命名,并与一个类别相关的干扰物(如猫)或不相关的干扰物(如钢笔)一起呈现。在相关条件下,相对于不相关条件,经历了学习阶段的参与者的反应较慢。相比之下,之前不熟悉这些材料的参与者则表现出促进作用。在实验2中,一组参与者像往常一样,在看到相应图片(如青蛙)时学习说出目标单词。另一组参与者在看到不相关图片(如时钟)时学习说出相同的目标单词。他们表现出非常相似的语义效应。文中讨论了这些研究结果在单词生成研究中的意义。

相似文献

1
Word production and the picture-word interference paradigm: the role of learning.词汇生成与图词干扰范式:学习的作用。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2013 Oct;42(5):461-73. doi: 10.1007/s10936-012-9229-z.
2
A novel multi-word paradigm for investigating semantic context effects in language production.一种用于研究语言产生中语义语境效应的新的多词范式。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 10;15(4):e0230439. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230439. eCollection 2020.
3
Naming and categorizing objects: task differences modulate the polarity of semantic effects in the picture-word interference paradigm.命名和分类物体:任务差异调节图片-词汇干扰范式中语义效应的极性。
Mem Cognit. 2012 Jul;40(5):760-8. doi: 10.3758/s13421-012-0184-6.
4
Learning new meanings for old words: effects of semantic relatedness.学习旧词的新义:语义相关性的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2012 Oct;40(7):1095-108. doi: 10.3758/s13421-012-0209-1.
5
When bees hamper the production of honey: lexical interference from associates in speech production.当蜜蜂妨碍蜂蜜生产时:言语产生中来自联想词的词汇干扰。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007 May;33(3):604-14. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.3.604.
6
Do part-whole relations produce facilitation in the picture-word interference task?部分-整体关系在图片-单词干扰任务中会产生促进作用吗?
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2014;67(9):1768-85. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.870589. Epub 2014 Jan 22.
7
Event-related potentials and oscillatory brain responses associated with semantic and Stroop-like interference effects in overt naming.与显性命名中语义和 Stroop 样干扰效应相关的事件相关电位和振荡脑反应。
Brain Res. 2012 Apr 23;1450:87-101. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.02.050. Epub 2012 Feb 28.
8
On the categorical nature of the semantic interference effect in the picture-word interference paradigm.关于图片-单词干扰范式中语义干扰效应的类别性质。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Feb;12(1):125-31. doi: 10.3758/bf03196357.
9
Semantic and phonological schema influence spoken word learning and overnight consolidation.语义和语音图式影响口语学习及夜间巩固。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2018 Jun;71(6):1469-1481. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2017.1329325. Epub 2018 Jan 19.
10
Semantic predictability eliminates the transposed-letter effect.语义可预测性消除了移字母效应。
Mem Cognit. 2012 May;40(4):628-41. doi: 10.3758/s13421-011-0170-4.

引用本文的文献

1
A cautionary note on the studies using the picture-word interference paradigm: the unwelcome consequences of the random use of "in/animates".关于使用图片-单词干扰范式研究的警示:随意使用“有生命/无生命”概念带来的不良后果
Front Psychol. 2023 May 5;14:1145884. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1145884. eCollection 2023.
2
Cognitive control of action naming in adults who stutter.口吃成人动作命名的认知控制。
J Fluency Disord. 2021 Dec;70:105841. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2021.105841. Epub 2021 Feb 27.
3
When and Both Help the Production of : ERP Evidence for Post-lexical Semantic Facilitation in Picture Naming.

本文引用的文献

1
Lexical selection is not by competition: a reinterpretation of semantic interference and facilitation effects in the picture-word interference paradigm.词汇选择并非通过竞争:对图片-单词干扰范式中语义干扰和促进效应的重新诠释。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007 May;33(3):503-35. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.3.503.
2
On the categorical nature of the semantic interference effect in the picture-word interference paradigm.关于图片-单词干扰范式中语义干扰效应的类别性质。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Feb;12(1):125-31. doi: 10.3758/bf03196357.
3
Representing the meanings of object and action words: the featural and unitary semantic space hypothesis.
“and” 与 “when” 均有助于 的产生:图片命名中后词汇语义促进作用的事件相关电位证据
Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 Apr 10;12:136. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00136. eCollection 2018.
4
The Picture-Word Interference Paradigm: Grammatical Class Effects in Lexical Production.图片-单词干扰范式:词汇生成中的语法类别效应
J Psycholinguist Res. 2016 Oct;45(5):1003-19. doi: 10.1007/s10936-015-9388-9.
5
The roles of shared vs. distinctive conceptual features in lexical access.共享与独特概念特征在词汇获取中的作用。
Front Psychol. 2014 Sep 16;5:1014. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01014. eCollection 2014.
6
Real-time processing in picture naming in adults who stutter: ERP evidence.口吃成年人图片命名中的实时处理:事件相关电位证据
Clin Neurophysiol. 2015 Feb;126(2):284-96. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2014.05.009. Epub 2014 May 20.
表征物体和动作词汇的意义:特征性与整体性语义空间假说
Cogn Psychol. 2004 Jun;48(4):422-88. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2003.09.001.
4
Working memory and language: an overview.工作记忆与语言:概述
J Commun Disord. 2003 May-Jun;36(3):189-208. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9924(03)00019-4.
5
Goal-referenced selection of verbal action: modeling attentional control in the Stroop task.言语行为的目标参照选择:在斯特鲁普任务中对注意力控制进行建模。
Psychol Rev. 2003 Jan;110(1):88-125. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.110.1.88.
6
A theory of lexical access in speech production.言语产生中的词汇通达理论。
Behav Brain Sci. 1999 Feb;22(1):1-38; discussion 38-75. doi: 10.1017/s0140525x99001776.
7
Set size and repetition in the picture--word interference paradigm: implications for models of naming.图片-单词干扰范式中的集合大小与重复:对命名模型的启示
Cognition. 2001 Jul;80(3):291-8. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(00)00137-2.
8
Testing a non-decompositional theory of lemma retrieval in speaking: retrieval of verbs.检验口语中引语检索的非分解理论:动词的检索
Cognition. 1993 Apr;47(1):59-87. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(93)90062-z.
9
A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity.一套标准化的260张图片:名称一致性、图像一致性、熟悉度和视觉复杂度的规范。
J Exp Psychol Hum Learn. 1980 Mar;6(2):174-215. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.6.2.174.
10
The time course of picture-word interference.图词干扰的时间进程。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1984 Oct;10(5):640-54. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.10.5.640.