Baseler L, de Wit E, Scott D P, Munster V J, Feldmann H
Laboratory of Virology, Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Hamilton, MT, USA Department of Comparative Pathobiology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Laboratory of Virology, Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Hamilton, MT, USA.
Vet Pathol. 2015 Jan;52(1):38-45. doi: 10.1177/0300985814556189. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
Nipah virus is a paramyxovirus in the genus Henipavirus, which has caused outbreaks in humans in Malaysia, India, Singapore, and Bangladesh. Whereas the human cases in Malaysia were characterized mainly by neurological symptoms and a case fatality rate of ∼40%, cases in Bangladesh also exhibited respiratory disease and had a case fatality rate of ∼70%. Here, we compared the histopathologic changes in the respiratory tract of Syrian hamsters, a well-established small animal disease model for Nipah virus, inoculated oronasally with Nipah virus isolates from human cases in Malaysia and Bangladesh. The Nipah virus isolate from Bangladesh caused slightly more severe rhinitis and bronchointerstitial pneumonia 2 days after inoculation in Syrian hamsters. By day 4, differences in lesion severity could no longer be detected. Immunohistochemistry demonstrated Nipah virus antigen in the nasal cavity and pulmonary lesions; the amount of Nipah virus antigen present correlated with lesion severity. Immunohistochemistry indicated that both Nipah virus isolates exhibited endotheliotropism in small- and medium-caliber arteries and arterioles, but not in veins, in the lung. This correlated with the location of ephrin B2, the main receptor for Nipah virus, in the vasculature. In conclusion, Nipah virus isolates from outbreaks in Malaysia and Bangladesh caused a similar type and severity of respiratory tract lesions in Syrian hamsters, suggesting that the differences in human disease reported in the outbreaks in Malaysia and Bangladesh are unlikely to have been caused by intrinsic differences in these 2 virus isolates.
尼帕病毒是亨尼帕病毒属的一种副粘病毒,曾在马来西亚、印度、新加坡和孟加拉国引发人间疫情。马来西亚的人间病例主要表现为神经症状,病死率约为40%,而孟加拉国的病例还出现了呼吸道疾病,病死率约为70%。在此,我们比较了叙利亚仓鼠呼吸道的组织病理学变化,叙利亚仓鼠是一种成熟的尼帕病毒小动物疾病模型,经鼻接种来自马来西亚和孟加拉国人间病例的尼帕病毒分离株。来自孟加拉国的尼帕病毒分离株在接种后2天在叙利亚仓鼠中引起的鼻炎和支气管间质性肺炎略为严重。到第4天,病变严重程度的差异已无法检测到。免疫组织化学在鼻腔和肺部病变中显示出尼帕病毒抗原;存在的尼帕病毒抗原量与病变严重程度相关。免疫组织化学表明,两种尼帕病毒分离株在肺中的小动脉和小动脉中均表现出嗜内皮性,但在静脉中未表现出嗜内皮性。这与尼帕病毒的主要受体埃夫林B2在脉管系统中的位置相关。总之,来自马来西亚和孟加拉国疫情的尼帕病毒分离株在叙利亚仓鼠中引起了相似类型和严重程度的呼吸道病变,这表明在马来西亚和孟加拉国疫情中报告的人间疾病差异不太可能是由这两种病毒分离株的内在差异引起的。