Suppr超能文献

正念与情绪结果:运用潜在剖面分析识别大学生亚组

Mindfulness and Emotional Outcomes: Identifying Subgroups of College Students using Latent Profile Analysis.

作者信息

Pearson Matthew R, Lawless Adrienne K, Brown David B, Bravo Adrian J

机构信息

Center on Alcoholism, Substance Abuse, & Addictions, University of New Mexico.

Department of Psychology, Old Dominion University.

出版信息

Pers Individ Dif. 2015 Apr 1;76:33-38. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2014.11.009.

Abstract

In non-meditating samples, distinct facets of mindfulness are found to be negatively correlated, preventing the meaningful creation of a total mindfulness score. The present study used person-centered analyses to distinguish subgroups of college students based on their mindfulness scores, which allows the examination of individuals who are high (or low) on all facets of mindfulness. Using the Lo-Mendell-Rubin Adjusted LRT test, we settled on a 4-class solution that included a high mindfulness group (high on all 5 facets, = 245), low mindfulness group (moderately low on all 5 facets, = 563), judgmentally observing group (high on observing, but low on non-judging and acting with awareness, =63), and non-judgmentally aware group (low on observing, but high on non-judging and acting with awareness, =70). Consistent across all emotional outcomes including depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms (i.e., worry), affective instability, and distress intolerance, we found that the judgmentally observing group had the most maladaptive emotional outcomes followed by the low mindfulness group. Both the high mindfulness group and the non-judgmentally aware group had the most adaptive emotional outcomes. We discuss the implications of person-centered analyses to exploring mindfulness as it relates to important psychological health outcomes.

摘要

在非冥想样本中,正念的不同维度被发现呈负相关,这使得无法有意义地创建一个总的正念得分。本研究采用以个体为中心的分析方法,根据大学生的正念得分来区分亚组,这使得能够考察在正念所有维度上得分高(或低)的个体。使用洛-门德尔-鲁宾调整后的似然比检验,我们确定了一个四类解决方案,其中包括一个高正念组(在所有五个维度上得分高,n = 245)、低正念组(在所有五个维度上中度低,n = 563)、评判性观察组(在观察维度上得分高,但在不评判和有意识行动维度上得分低,n = 63)和非评判性觉知组(在观察维度上得分低,但在不评判和有意识行动维度上得分高,n = 70)。在包括抑郁症状、焦虑症状(即担忧)、情感不稳定和痛苦不耐受在内的所有情绪结果中,我们发现评判性观察组的情绪结果最适应不良,其次是低正念组。高正念组和非评判性觉知组的情绪结果最具适应性。我们讨论了以个体为中心的分析对于探索与重要心理健康结果相关的正念的意义。

相似文献

9
What is the mindful personality? Implications for physical and psychological health.什么是正念人格?对身心健康的影响。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2022 Apr;224:103514. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103514. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
10
Collegiate Substance Use: A Tale of Differential Risk and Coping.大学生物质使用:一个差异化风险与应对的故事。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020 Jul 1;212:108038. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108038. Epub 2020 May 12.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
Mapping mindfulness facets onto dimensions of anxiety and depression.将正念各维度映射到焦虑和抑郁的维度上。
Behav Ther. 2013 Sep;44(3):373-84. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2013.02.001. Epub 2013 Feb 26.
5
Effects of mindfulness on psychological health: a review of empirical studies.正念对心理健康的影响:实证研究综述。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2011 Aug;31(6):1041-56. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2011.04.006. Epub 2011 May 13.
10
Mechanisms of mindfulness.正念的机制。
J Clin Psychol. 2006 Mar;62(3):373-86. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20237.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验