Ridsdale L, Carruthers M, Morris R, Ridsdale J
J R Coll Gen Pract. 1989 Dec;39(329):488-91.
This study looked at the effect of different appointment time intervals on process and outcome measures in the consultation. Over a five-month period patients attending a two-partner surgery were non-systematically allocated to appointments at five, 10 or 15 minute intervals. Consultations were audiotaped and analysed. When appointments were scheduled at longer intervals, doctors asked significantly more questions and made significantly more statements explaining the problem and its management, while patients asked significantly more questions and made significantly more statements of their own ideas about the problem. In consultations booked at shorter intervals patients were significantly more likely to report in satisfaction questionnaires that they had little or far too little time available. The implications of the results for future planning are discussed.
本研究探讨了不同预约时间间隔对会诊过程及结果指标的影响。在五个月的时间里,前往一家由两名医生坐诊的诊所就诊的患者被非系统地分配到间隔为5分钟、10分钟或15分钟的预约时段。会诊过程进行了录音并加以分析。当预约时间间隔较长时,医生会提出显著更多的问题,并做出显著更多关于问题及其处理方式的解释性陈述,而患者则会提出显著更多的问题,并做出显著更多关于自身对问题看法的陈述。在预约时间间隔较短的会诊中,患者在满意度调查问卷中更有可能表示他们可用的时间很少或极少。文中讨论了这些结果对未来规划的启示。