McLane Hannah C, Berkowitz Aaron L, Patenaude Bryan N, McKenzie Erica D, Wolper Emma, Wahlster Sarah, Fink Günther, Mateen Farrah J
From the Department of Neurology (H.C.M.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Harvard Medical School (A.L.B., S.W., F.J.M.), Boston; Department of Neurology (A.L.B., S.W.), Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health (B.N.P., G.F.), Boston; Department of Neurology (E.D.M., E.W., S.W., F.J.M.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; School of Medicine (E.D.M.), Queen's University, Kingston, Canada; and Lesley University (E.W.), Cambridge, MA.
Neurology. 2015 Nov 3;85(18):1614-22. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002090. Epub 2015 Oct 7.
To determine the availability, accessibility, and affordability of EEG, EMG, CSF analysis, head CT, and brain MRI for neurologic disorders across countries.
An online, 60-question survey was distributed to neurology practitioners in 2014 to assess the presence, wait time, and cost of each test in private and public health sectors. Data were stratified by World Bank country income group. Affordability was calculated with reference to the World Health Organization's definition of catastrophic health expenditure as health-related out-of-pocket expenditure of >40% of disposable household income, and assessment of providers' perceptions of affordability to the patient.
Availability of EEG and EMG is correlated with higher World Bank income group (correlation coefficient 0.38, test for trend p = 0.046; 0.376, p = 0.043); CSF, CT, and MRI did not show statistically significant associations with income groups. Patients in public systems wait longer for neurodiagnostic tests, especially MRI, EEG, and urgent CT (p < 0.0001). The mean cost per test, across all tests, was lower in the public vs private sector (US $55.25 vs $214.62, p < 0.001). Each drop in World Bank income group is associated with a 29% decrease in the estimated share of the population who can afford a given test (95% confidence interval -33.4, 25.2; p < 0.001). In most low-income countries surveyed, only the top 10% or 20% of the population was able to afford tests below catastrophic levels. In surveyed lower-middle-income countries, >40% of the population, on average, could not afford neurodiagnostic tests.
Neurodiagnostic tests are least affordable in the lowest income settings. Closing this "diagnostic gap" for countries with the lowest incomes is essential.
确定脑电图(EEG)、肌电图(EMG)、脑脊液分析、头部计算机断层扫描(CT)和脑部磁共振成像(MRI)在各国用于神经系统疾病诊断时的可获得性、可及性和可负担性。
2014年向神经科医生发放了一份包含60个问题的在线调查问卷,以评估私立和公共卫生部门每项检查的配备情况、等待时间和费用。数据按世界银行国家收入组别进行分层。可负担性是参照世界卫生组织对灾难性卫生支出的定义来计算的,即与健康相关的自付费用超过家庭可支配收入的40%,并评估医疗服务提供者对患者可负担性的看法。
EEG和EMG的可获得性与世界银行较高收入组别相关(相关系数分别为0.38,趋势检验p = 0.046;0.376,p = 0.043);脑脊液分析、CT和MRI与收入组别之间未显示出具有统计学意义的关联。公共医疗系统中的患者等待神经诊断检查的时间更长,尤其是MRI、EEG和急诊CT(p < 0.0001)。所有检查的每项检查平均费用,公共部门低于私立部门(分别为55.25美元和214.62美元,p < 0.001)。世界银行收入组别的每下降一级,能够负担特定检查的人口估计比例就下降29%(95%置信区间 -33.4,25.2;p < 0.001)。在大多数接受调查的低收入国家,只有最富有的10%或20%的人口能够负担得起低于灾难性水平的检查。在接受调查的中低收入国家,平均而言,超过40%的人口负担不起神经诊断检查。
神经诊断检查在最低收入环境中最难以负担得起。缩小低收入国家的这一“诊断差距”至关重要。