Steward Jocelyn, Holt Cheryl L, Pollio David E, Austin Erika L, Johnson Nancy, Gordon Adam J, Kertesz Stefan G
Department of Health Care Management, Clayton State University, Morrow, GA, USA.
Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2016 Feb 12;10:153-8. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S75477. eCollection 2016.
Homeless individuals face unique challenges in health care. Several US initiatives seeking to advance patient-centered primary care for homeless persons are more likely to succeed if they incorporate the priorities of the patients they are to serve. However, there has been no prior research to elicit their priorities in primary care. This study sought to identify aspects of primary care important to persons familiar with homelessness based on personal experience or professional commitment, and to highlight where the priorities of patients and professionals dedicated to their care converge or diverge.
This qualitative exercise asked 26 homeless patients and ten provider/experts to rank 16 aspects of primary care using a card sort. Patient-level respondents (n=26) were recruited from homeless service organizations across all regions of the USA and from an established board of homeless service users. Provider/expert-level respondents (n=10) were recruited from veteran and non-veteran-focused homeless health care programs with similar geographic diversity.
Both groups gave high priority to accessibility, evidence-based care, coordination, and cooperation. Provider/experts endorsed patient control more strongly than patients. Patients ranked information about their care more highly than provider/experts.
Accessibility and the perception of care based on medical evidence represent priority concerns for homeless patients and provider/experts. Patient control, a concept endorsed by experts, is not strongly endorsed by homeless patients. Understanding how to assure fluid communication, coordination, and team member cooperation could represent more worthy targets for research and quality improvement in this domain.
无家可归者在医疗保健方面面临独特挑战。美国的几项旨在推进以患者为中心的无家可归者初级保健计划,如果纳入其服务对象的优先事项,则更有可能取得成功。然而,此前尚无研究来确定他们在初级保健方面的优先事项。本研究旨在根据个人经历或专业承诺,确定对熟悉无家可归情况的人来说重要的初级保健方面,并强调患者及其护理专业人员的优先事项在哪些方面趋于一致或存在分歧。
这项定性研究要求26名无家可归患者和10名提供者/专家通过卡片分类法对初级保健的16个方面进行排序。患者层面的受访者(n = 26)从美国所有地区的无家可归者服务组织以及一个既定的无家可归者服务使用者委员会中招募。提供者/专家层面的受访者(n = 10)从具有类似地理多样性的退伍军人和非退伍军人重点无家可归者医疗保健项目中招募。
两组都高度重视可及性、循证护理、协调与合作。提供者/专家比患者更强烈地支持患者控制权。患者对其护理信息的重视程度高于提供者/专家。
可及性以及基于医学证据的护理观念是无家可归患者和提供者/专家的优先关注事项。专家认可的患者控制权并未得到无家可归患者的强烈认可。了解如何确保流畅的沟通、协调以及团队成员合作可能是该领域更有价值的研究和质量改进目标。