DeYoung Colin G, Carey Bridget E, Krueger Robert F, Ross Scott R
Psychology Department, University of Minnesota.
Psychology Department, DePauw University.
Personal Disord. 2016 Apr;7(2):113-23. doi: 10.1037/per0000170. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.; DSM-5) includes a dimensional model of personality pathology, operationalized in the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5), with 25 facets grouped into 5 higher order factors resembling the Big Five personality dimensions. The present study tested how well these 25 facets could be integrated with the 10-factor structure of traits within the Big Five that is operationalized by the Big Five Aspect Scales (BFAS). In 2 healthy adult samples, 10-factor solutions largely confirmed our hypothesis that each of the 10 BFAS would be the highest loading BFAS on 1 and only 1 factor. Varying numbers of PID-5 scales were additional markers of each factor, and the overall factor structure in the first sample was well replicated in the second. Our results allow Cybernetic Big Five Theory (CB5T) to be brought to bear on manifestations of personality disorder, because CB5T offers mechanistic explanations of the 10 factors measured by the BFAS. Future research, therefore, may begin to test hypotheses derived from CB5T regarding the mechanisms that are dysfunctional in specific personality disorders.
《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》（第5版；DSM - 5）包含一个人格病理学的维度模型，该模型通过《DSM - 5人格量表》（PID - 5）进行操作化，其中25个方面被归为5个高阶因素，类似于大五人格维度。本研究测试了这25个方面与由大五方面量表（BFAS）操作化的大五人格中10因素特质结构的整合程度。在2个健康成人样本中，10因素解决方案在很大程度上证实了我们的假设，即10个BFAS中的每一个在1个且仅1个因素上具有最高负荷。不同数量的PID - 5量表是每个因素的额外标记，并且第一个样本中的整体因素结构在第二个样本中得到了很好的复制。我们的结果使得控制论大五人格理论（CB5T）能够应用于人格障碍的表现，因为CB5T为BFAS所测量的10个因素提供了机制性解释。因此，未来的研究可能开始检验从CB5T得出的关于特定人格障碍中功能失调机制的假设。
