Suppr超能文献

干眼患者中,光谱域光学相干断层扫描与超声角膜测厚仪测量中央角膜厚度的差异

Differences in Central Corneal Thickness between Spectral Domain-Optical Coherence Tomography and Ultrasound Pachymetry in Patients with Dry Eye Disease.

作者信息

Celebi Ali Riza Cenk, Mirza G Ertugrul

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Acibadem University School of Medicine, 34303 Istanbul, Turkey.

Department of Ophthalmology, Erciyes University School of Medicine, 38030 Kayseri, Turkey.

出版信息

J Ophthalmol. 2016;2016:2623719. doi: 10.1155/2016/2623719. Epub 2016 Jun 8.

Abstract

Purpose. To compare central corneal thickness (CCT) values via Spectral Domain-Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT) and ultrasonic pachymetry in patients with severe dry eye disease (DED) to determine the level of agreement between these 2 methods. Methods. The paired samples t-test was used to compare CCT values in severe DED patients. Matching analysis between methods was performed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Intrasession reliability of the measurement methods was calculated via the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), variation equivalent, and Pearson's correlation coefficient. The Bland-Altman procedure was used to graphically represent the differences between CCT values. Results. The study included 56 eyes of 24 female and 4 male patients. Mean age of the patients was 50.9 ± 11.3 years. Mean CCT via Cirrus SD-OCT was 523.82 ± 30.98 μm versus 530.050 ± 31.85 μm via ultrasonic pachymetry (paired samples t-test, P < 0.001). The Bland-Altman plot showed good agreement between the examiners. The ICC for repeatability was 0.974. The CCC between the 2 methods' CCT values was 0.973. The variation equivalent was 0.976 and Pearson's correlation coefficient was 99.3%, which also indicated high correlation between the 2 methods' measurements. Conclusions. The present findings show that in patients with severe DED Cirrus SD-OCT provides reliable intraobserver CCT values.

摘要

目的。通过光谱域光学相干断层扫描(SD-OCT)和超声测厚法比较重度干眼病(DED)患者的中央角膜厚度(CCT)值,以确定这两种方法之间的一致性水平。方法。采用配对样本t检验比较重度DED患者的CCT值。使用组内相关系数(ICC)进行方法之间的匹配分析。通过一致性相关系数(CCC)、变异当量和Pearson相关系数计算测量方法的测量内可靠性。采用Bland-Altman法以图形方式表示CCT值之间的差异。结果。该研究纳入了24名女性和4名男性患者的56只眼。患者的平均年龄为50.9±11.3岁。通过Cirrus SD-OCT测得的平均CCT为523.82±30.98μm,而通过超声测厚法测得的平均CCT为530.050±31.85μm(配对样本t检验,P<0.001)。Bland-Altman图显示检查者之间具有良好的一致性。重复性的ICC为0.974。两种方法的CCT值之间的CCC为0.973。变异当量为0.976,Pearson相关系数为99.3%,这也表明两种方法的测量之间具有高度相关性。结论。目前的研究结果表明,在重度DED患者中,Cirrus SD-OCT可提供可靠的观察者内CCT值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b839/4916283/29273f1a42ed/JOPH2016-2623719.001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验