• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超越威权人格:中国威权主义取向的文化包容理论

Beyond Authoritarian Personality: The Culture-Inclusive Theory of Chinese Authoritarian Orientation.

作者信息

Chien Chin-Lung

机构信息

Psychology, Kaohsiung Medical UniversityKaohsiung, Taiwan; Positive Psychology Center, Kaohsiung Medical UniversityKaohsiung, Taiwan.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2016 Jun 30;7:924. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00924. eCollection 2016.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00924
PMID:27445894
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4927584/
Abstract

In a dyad interaction, respecting and obeying those with high status (authority) is highly valued in Chinese societies. Regarding explicit behaviors, Chinese people usually show respect to and obey authority, which we call authoritarian orientation. Previous literature has indicated that Chinese people have a high degree of authoritarian personality, which was considered a national character. However, under Confucian relationalism (Hwang, 2012a), authoritarian orientation is basically an ethical issue, and thus, should not be reduced to the contention of authoritarian personality. Based on Yang's (1993) indigenous conceptualization, Chien (2013) took an emic bottom-up approach to construct an indigenous model of Chinese authoritarian orientation; it represents a "culture-inclusive theory." However, Chien's model lacks the role of agency or intentionality. To resolve this issue and to achieve the epistemological goal of indigenous psychology (that is, "one mind, many mentalities"), this paper took the "cultural system approach" (Hwang, 2015b) to construct a culture-inclusive theory of authoritarian orientation in order to represent the universal mind of human beings as well as the mentalities of people in a particular culture. Two theories that reflect the universal mind, the "Face and Favor model" (Hwang, 1987) and the "Mandala Model of Self" (Hwang, 2011a,c), were used as analytical frameworks for interpreting Chien's original model. The process of constructing the culture-inclusive theory of authoritarian orientation may represent a paradigm for the construction of indigenous culture-inclusive theories while inspiring further development. Some future research directions are proposed herein.

摘要

在二元互动中,尊重和服从地位高(有权威)的人在中国社会备受重视。在显性行为方面,中国人通常尊重并服从权威,我们称之为权威取向。以往文献表明,中国人具有高度的权威人格,这被视为一种民族性格。然而,在儒家关系主义(黄光国,2012a)的视角下,权威取向本质上是一个伦理问题,因此,不应简化为权威人格的争论。基于杨国枢(1993)的本土概念化,钱永祥(2013)采用了一种从本土视角自下而上的方法来构建中国权威取向的本土模型;它代表了一种“文化包容理论”。然而,钱永祥的模型缺乏能动性或意向性的作用。为了解决这个问题并实现本土心理学的认识论目标(即“一心,多心态”),本文采用“文化系统方法”(黄光国,2015b)来构建一个权威取向的文化包容理论,以展现人类的普遍心理以及特定文化中人们的心理状态。两种反映普遍心理的理论,即“面子与人情模型”(黄光国,1987)和“自我的曼陀罗模型”(黄光国,2011a、c),被用作解释钱永祥原始模型的分析框架。构建权威取向文化包容理论的过程可能代表了构建本土文化包容理论的一种范式,同时也能激发进一步的发展。本文在此提出了一些未来的研究方向。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a167/4927584/3eafec56c2d2/fpsyg-07-00924-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a167/4927584/a9e0f5880415/fpsyg-07-00924-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a167/4927584/c79c10b1f1bf/fpsyg-07-00924-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a167/4927584/3eafec56c2d2/fpsyg-07-00924-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a167/4927584/a9e0f5880415/fpsyg-07-00924-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a167/4927584/c79c10b1f1bf/fpsyg-07-00924-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a167/4927584/3eafec56c2d2/fpsyg-07-00924-g0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Beyond Authoritarian Personality: The Culture-Inclusive Theory of Chinese Authoritarian Orientation.超越威权人格:中国威权主义取向的文化包容理论
Front Psychol. 2016 Jun 30;7:924. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00924. eCollection 2016.
2
A Cross-Cultural Study of Filial Piety and Palliative Care Knowledge: Moderating Effect of Culture and Universality of Filial Piety.孝道与姑息治疗知识的跨文化研究:文化的调节作用与孝道的普遍性
Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 3;12:787724. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.787724. eCollection 2021.
3
An assessment of the relational orientation framework for Chinese societies: Scale development and Chinese relationalism.中国社会关系取向框架评估:量表开发与中国关系主义
Psych J. 2021 Feb;10(1):112-127. doi: 10.1002/pchj.403. Epub 2020 Sep 20.
4
The Taiji Model of Self.自我的太极模型
Front Psychol. 2019 Jun 21;10:1443. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01443. eCollection 2019.
5
The "One Mind, Two Aspects" Model of the Self: The Self Model and Self-Cultivation Theory of Chinese Buddhism.自我的“一心二面”模型:中国佛教的自我模型与自我修养理论
Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 28;12:652465. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.652465. eCollection 2021.
6
Rethinking dependent personality disorder: comparing different human relatedness in cultural contexts.重新审视依赖型人格障碍:比较文化背景下不同的人际关联
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2009 Nov;197(11):793-800. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e3181be76ae.
7
The Positive Effect of Authoritarian Leadership on Employee Performance: The Moderating Role of Power Distance.专制领导对员工绩效的积极影响:权力距离的调节作用。
Front Psychol. 2018 Mar 23;9:357. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00357. eCollection 2018.
8
The Process of Self-Cultivation and the Mandala Model of the Self.自我修养的过程与自我的曼陀罗模型
Front Psychol. 2017 Jan 24;8:24. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00024. eCollection 2017.
9
Indigenization and beyond: methodological relationalism in the study of personality across cultural traditions.本土化及其他:跨文化传统人格研究中的方法论关系主义
J Pers. 2001 Dec;69(6):925-53. doi: 10.1111/1467-6494.696170.
10
Filial piety, authoritarian moralism, and cognitive conservatism in Chinese societies.中国社会中的孝道、威权道德主义和认知保守主义。
Genet Soc Gen Psychol Monogr. 1994 Aug;120(3):349-65.

引用本文的文献

1
Information and authority: research on the mechanism of offspring's health information avoidance behavior.信息与权威:子代健康信息回避行为机制研究
Front Public Health. 2025 Jul 7;13:1516225. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1516225. eCollection 2025.
2
"Negative Energy Magnetic Field": A Descriptive Qualitative Study on Occupational Stressors among Chinese Hospice Nurses.“负能量磁场”:一项关于中国临终关怀护士职业压力源的描述性定性研究
J Nurs Manag. 2024 Aug 29;2024:3311735. doi: 10.1155/2024/3311735. eCollection 2024.
3
Physical symptoms distress and demoralization among haemodialysis patients; the mediating effect of spirituality and self-compassion. A cross-sectional questionnaire survey.

本文引用的文献

1
Introduction to the special section on authoritarianism in societal context: the role of threat.社会背景下威权主义专题介绍:威胁的作用
Int J Psychol. 2013;48(1):1-5. doi: 10.1080/00207594.2012.738298.
2
Taiwanese students' self-attributions for two types of achievement goals.台湾学生对两种成就目标的自我归因。
J Soc Psychol. 2009 Apr;149(2):179-93. doi: 10.3200/SOCP.149.2.179-194.
3
A new look at habits and the habit-goal interface.重新审视习惯和习惯-目标界面。
血液透析患者的身体症状、痛苦与士气低落;灵性与自我同情的中介作用。一项横断面问卷调查。
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2025 Jan 3;8:100288. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100288. eCollection 2025 Jun.
4
Mobile phone intervention to reduce dropout from treatment at an outpatient mental health service for older people in Nigeria.手机干预减少尼日利亚老年人门诊心理健康服务中治疗脱落。
Afr Health Sci. 2023 Dec;23(4):551-562. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v23i4.58.
5
Enhancing vaccination uptake through community engagement: evidence from China.通过社区参与提高疫苗接种率:来自中国的证据。
Sci Rep. 2024 May 13;14(1):10845. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-61583-5.
6
Does interpersonal self-support matter for freshman nursing students' professional identity? Evidence from mainland China.人际自我支持对本科护理专业新生的职业认同感重要吗?来自中国大陆的证据。
Front Psychol. 2023 May 23;14:1123625. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1123625. eCollection 2023.
7
Applying the Dual Filial Piety Model in the United States: A Comparison of Filial Piety Between Asian Americans and Caucasian Americans.在美国应用双重孝道模式:美籍亚裔与美籍高加索人孝道的比较
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 3;12:786609. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.786609. eCollection 2021.
Psychol Rev. 2007 Oct;114(4):843-63. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.114.4.843.
4
"Cultural fit": individual and societal discrepancies in values, beliefs, and subjective well-being.“文化契合度”:价值观、信仰和主观幸福感方面的个体与社会差异。
J Soc Psychol. 2006 Apr;146(2):203-21. doi: 10.3200/SOCP.146.2.203-221.
5
Bringing culture to basic psychological theory--beyond individualism and collectivism: comment on Oyserman et al. (2002).将文化融入基础心理学理论——超越个人主义和集体主义:评奥伊泽曼等人(2002年)的研究
Psychol Bull. 2002 Jan;128(1):97-109. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.128.1.97.
6
Using individualism and collectivism to compare cultures--a critique of the validity and measurement of the constructs: comment on Oyserman et al. (2002).运用个人主义和集体主义来比较文化——对这些概念的有效性及衡量方法的批判:评奥伊泽曼等人(2002年)的研究
Psychol Bull. 2002 Jan;128(1):78-88. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.128.1.78.
7
Rethinking individualism and collectivism: evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses.重新思考个人主义与集体主义:理论假设与元分析评估
Psychol Bull. 2002 Jan;128(1):3-72.
8
A cross-cultural study of authoritarianism.威权主义的跨文化研究。
J Soc Psychol. 1967 Jun;72(1):3-7. doi: 10.1080/00224545.1967.9922293.
9
The four elementary forms of sociality: framework for a unified theory of social relations.社会性的四种基本形式:社会关系统一理论的框架
Psychol Rev. 1992 Oct;99(4):689-723. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.99.4.689.