• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国为减轻气候变化和促进公众健康而进行的饮食变化。

Dietary changes to mitigate climate change and benefit public health in China.

机构信息

Key Laboratory of Industrial Ecology and Environmental Engineering (MOE), School of Environmental Science and Technology, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, PR China.

Key Laboratory of Industrial Ecology and Environmental Engineering (MOE), School of Environmental Science and Technology, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, PR China.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2017 Jan 15;577:289-298. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.184. Epub 2016 Oct 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.184
PMID:27802883
Abstract

Dietary change presents an opportunity to meet the dual challenges of non-communicable diseases and the effects of climate change in China. Based on a food survey and reviewed data sets, we linked nutrient composition and carbon footprint data by aggregating 1950 types of foods into 28 groups. Nine dietary scenarios for both men and women were modeled based on the current diet and latest National Program for Food and Nutrition. Linear uncertainty optimization was used to produce diets meeting the Chinese Dietary Reference Intakes for adults aged 18-50years while minimizing carbon footprints. The theoretical optimal diet reduced daily footprints by 46%, but this diet was unrealistic due to limited food diversity. Constrained by acceptability, the optimal diet reduced the daily carbon footprints by 7-28%, from 3495 to 2517-3252g COe, for men and by 5-26%, from 3075 to 2280-2917g COe, for women. Dietary changes for adults are capable of benefiting China in terms of the considerable footprint reduction of 53-222Mt.COeyear, when magnified based on the Chinese population, which is the largest worldwide. Seven of eight scenarios showed that reductions in meat consumption resulted in greater reductions in greenhouse gas emissions. However, dramatic reductions in meat consumption may produce smaller reductions in emissions, as the consumption of other ingredients increases to compensate for the nutrients in meat. A trade-off between poultry and other meats (beef, pork, and lamb) is usually observed, and rice, which is a popular food in China, was the largest contributor to carbon footprint reductions. Our findings suggest that changing diets for climate change mitigation and human health is possible in China, though the per capital mitigation potential is slight lower than that in developed economies of France, Spain, Sweden, and New Zealand.

摘要

饮食结构的改变为中国应对非传染性疾病和气候变化影响带来了双重挑战。我们基于食物调查和已审查数据集,通过将 1950 种食物聚合到 28 组,将营养成分和碳足迹数据联系起来。基于当前饮食和最新的《国家食物与营养发展纲要》,我们为男性和女性分别构建了 9 种饮食情景。我们采用线性不确定性优化方法,生成了满足中国 18-50 岁成年人膳食参考摄入量,同时又将碳足迹最小化的饮食方案。理论上最优的饮食方案可使每日碳足迹减少 46%,但由于食物种类有限,这种饮食方案不切实际。在可接受性的约束下,最优饮食方案使男性的每日碳足迹减少 7-28%,从 3495 克 COe 减少到 2517-3252 克 COe;使女性的每日碳足迹减少 5-26%,从 3075 克 COe 减少到 2280-2917 克 COe。基于中国庞大的人口基数,对其进行放大,这些变化将使中国的足迹减少 53-222Mt.COe/年,这对中国来说是相当可观的。八个情景中有七个表明,减少肉类消费会导致温室气体排放的更大减少。然而,由于其他成分的消费增加以弥补肉类中的营养成分,大幅减少肉类消费可能会导致排放量减少幅度较小。禽肉和其他肉类(牛肉、猪肉和羊肉)之间通常存在此消彼长的关系,而大米作为中国的一种主食,是减少碳足迹的最大贡献者。我们的研究结果表明,中国有可能通过改变饮食结构来应对气候变化和人类健康问题,尽管人均减排潜力略低于法国、西班牙、瑞典和新西兰等发达经济体。

相似文献

1
Dietary changes to mitigate climate change and benefit public health in China.中国为减轻气候变化和促进公众健康而进行的饮食变化。
Sci Total Environ. 2017 Jan 15;577:289-298. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.184. Epub 2016 Oct 29.
2
Climate change mitigation opportunities based on carbon footprint estimates of dietary patterns in Peru.基于秘鲁饮食模式碳足迹估计的气候变化缓解机会。
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 16;12(11):e0188182. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188182. eCollection 2017.
3
Addressing the carbon footprint, healthfulness, and costs of self-selected diets in the USA: a population-based cross-sectional study.解决美国自选饮食的碳足迹、健康和成本问题:基于人群的横断面研究。
Lancet Planet Health. 2020 Mar;4(3):e98-e106. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30055-3.
4
Comparison of the carbon footprint of different patient diets in a Spanish hospital.西班牙一家医院中不同患者饮食的碳足迹比较。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2015 Jan;20(1):39-44. doi: 10.1177/1355819614553017. Epub 2014 Oct 8.
5
Meat consumption reduction in Italian regions: Health co-benefits and decreases in GHG emissions.意大利各地区肉类消费减少:健康协同效益与温室气体排放减少
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 15;12(8):e0182960. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182960. eCollection 2017.
6
Healthy diets with reduced environmental impact? - The greenhouse gas emissions of various diets adhering to the Dutch food based dietary guidelines.健康饮食与降低环境影响?——遵循荷兰基于食物的膳食指南的各种饮食的温室气体排放。
Food Res Int. 2018 Feb;104:14-24. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2017.06.006. Epub 2017 Jun 6.
7
Designing Nutritionally Adequate and Climate-Friendly Diets for Omnivorous, Pescatarian, Vegetarian and Vegan Adolescents in Sweden Using Linear Optimization.使用线性优化设计瑞典杂食、鱼素、素食和纯素青少年的营养充足且对气候友好的饮食
Nutrients. 2021 Jul 22;13(8):2507. doi: 10.3390/nu13082507.
8
Cooking at Home, Fast Food, Meat Consumption, and Dietary Carbon Footprint among US Adults.在家烹饪、快餐、肉类消费与美国成年人的饮食碳足迹。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 13;19(2):853. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19020853.
9
Balancing a sustained pursuit of nutrition, health, affordability and climate goals: exploring the case of Indonesia.平衡对营养、健康、可负担性和气候目标的持续追求:以印度尼西亚为例进行探讨。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2021 Nov 8;114(5):1686-1697. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqab258.
10
Greenhouse gas emissions and reactive nitrogen releases during the life-cycles of staple food production in China and their mitigation potential.中国主要粮食生产生命周期中的温室气体排放与活性氮释放及其减排潜力
Sci Total Environ. 2016 Jun 15;556:116-25. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.02.204. Epub 2016 Mar 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Environmental Impact of Current Diets and Alternative Dietary Scenarios Worldwide: A Systematic Review.全球当前饮食及替代饮食方案的环境影响:一项系统综述
Nutr Rev. 2025 Sep 1;83(9):1678-1710. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuae215.
2
US grass-fed beef is as carbon intensive as industrial beef and ≈10-fold more intensive than common protein-dense alternatives.美国草饲牛肉的碳密集度与工业化牛肉相当,比常见的高蛋白替代物高出约10倍。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Mar 25;122(12):e2404329122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2404329122. Epub 2025 Mar 17.
3
Dynamic Trends in Aquatic Product Supply and Consumption in China: Implications for Sustainable Diets and Environmental Impact Reduction.
中国水产品供应与消费的动态趋势:对可持续饮食及减少环境影响的启示
Foods. 2025 Jan 9;14(2):191. doi: 10.3390/foods14020191.
4
Health Co-Benefits of Environmental Changes in the Context of Carbon Peaking and Carbon Neutrality in China.中国碳达峰碳中和背景下环境变化带来的健康协同效益
Health Data Sci. 2024 Oct 2;4:0188. doi: 10.34133/hds.0188. eCollection 2024.
5
Diet-Attributable Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Acute Myocardial Infarction in Costa Rica Heart Study.哥斯达黎加心脏研究中的饮食归因温室气体排放与急性心肌梗死。
Nutrients. 2023 Dec 30;16(1):138. doi: 10.3390/nu16010138.
6
Dairy consumption in adults in China: a systematic review.中国成年人乳制品消费情况:一项系统综述
BMC Nutr. 2023 Oct 21;9(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s40795-023-00781-2.
7
Exploring healthy and climate-friendly diets for Danish adults: an optimization study using quadratic programming.探索丹麦成年人健康且气候友好型饮食:一项使用二次规划的优化研究。
Front Nutr. 2023 Jun 15;10:1158257. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1158257. eCollection 2023.
8
Dietary and Food Consumption Patterns and Their Associated Factors in the Tibetan Plateau Population: Results from 73 Counties with Agriculture and Animal Husbandry in Tibet, China.中国西藏高原农牧区人群的饮食和食物消费模式及其相关因素:来自西藏 73 个县的结果。
Nutrients. 2022 May 7;14(9):1955. doi: 10.3390/nu14091955.
9
Analysis of the Impact of Livestock Structure on Carbon Emissions of Animal Husbandry: A Sustainable Way to Improving Public Health and Green Environment.分析畜牧业结构对畜牧业碳排放的影响:改善公共健康和绿色环境的可持续途径。
Front Public Health. 2022 Feb 11;10:835210. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.835210. eCollection 2022.
10
Shifting to a Sustainable Dietary Pattern in Iranian Population: Current Evidence and Future Directions.伊朗人群转向可持续饮食模式:当前证据与未来方向
Front Nutr. 2021 Dec 22;8:789692. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.789692. eCollection 2021.