Suppr超能文献

重症监护病房光技术使用评估工具的构建与验证

Construction and validation of a tool to Assess the Use of Light Technologies at Intensive Care Units.

作者信息

Marinho Pabliane Matias Lordelo, Campos Maria Pontes de Aguiar, Rodrigues Eliana Ofélia Llapa, Gois Cristiane Franca Lisboa, Barreto Ikaro Daniel de Carvalho

机构信息

Specialist in Health Administration, RN, Hospital Universitário, Universidade Federal de Sergipe, Aracaju, SE, Brazil.

PhD, Associate Professor, Departamento de Enfermagem, Universidade Federal de Sergipe, Aracaju, SE, Brazil.

出版信息

Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2016 Dec 19;24:e2816. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.1002.2816.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

to construct and validate a tool to assess the use of light technologies by the nursing team at Intensive Care Units.

METHOD

methodological study in which the tool was elaborated by means of the psychometric method for construction based on the categorization of health technologies by Merhy and Franco, from the National Humanization Policy, using the Nursing Intervention Classification taxonomy to categorize the domains of the tool. Agreement Percentages and Content Validity Indices were used for the purpose of validation.

RESULTS

The result of the application of the Interrater Agreement Percentage exceeded the recommended level of 80%, highlighting the relevance for the proposed theme in the assessment, with an agreement rate of 99%.

CONCLUSION

the tool was validated with four domains (Bond, Autonomy, Welcoming and Management) and nineteen items that assess the use of light technologies at Intensive Care Units.

摘要

目的

构建并验证一种用于评估重症监护病房护理团队对光技术使用情况的工具。

方法

进行方法学研究,该工具通过基于国家人性化政策中梅尔希和佛朗哥对卫生技术的分类,采用心理测量方法构建,使用护理干预分类法对工具的领域进行分类。为进行验证,使用了一致率百分比和内容效度指数。

结果

评分者间一致率百分比的应用结果超过了推荐的80%水平,突出了该评估中所提议主题的相关性,一致率为99%。

结论

该工具通过四个领域(联系、自主性、欢迎和管理)以及19个项目进行了验证,这些领域和项目用于评估重症监护病房对光技术的使用情况。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b60/5171710/82c6ebd5fcc3/0104-1169-rlae-24-02816-gf1.jpg

相似文献

1
Construction and validation of a tool to Assess the Use of Light Technologies at Intensive Care Units.
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2016 Dec 19;24:e2816. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.1002.2816.
3
Assessing changes in a patient's condition - perspectives of intensive care nurses.
Nurs Crit Care. 2017 Mar;22(2):99-104. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12258. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
6
Working With Patients Living With Obesity in the Intensive Care Unit: A Study of Nurses' Experiences.
ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 2015 Jul-Sep;38(3):E17-37. doi: 10.1097/ANS.0000000000000074.
8
Mapping nursing goals of an intensive care unit to the Nursing Outcomes Classification.
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2012 Sep-Oct;20(5):854-62. doi: 10.1590/s0104-11692012000500006.
9
Development and validation of a daily assessment tool for critically ill patients.
Nurs Crit Care. 2023 May;28(3):404-410. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12717. Epub 2021 Sep 17.
10
Problems in Critical Care Nurse-Patient Communication: Examples of Poland and Turkey.
Acta Clin Croat. 2017 Sep;56(3):437-445. doi: 10.20471/acc.2017.56.03.10.

引用本文的文献

1
Communication in health work during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Invest Educ Enferm. 2020 Oct;38(3). doi: 10.17533/udea.iee.v38n3e09.
2
Nurses in the triage of the emergency department: self-compassion and empathy.
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2019 Jul 18;27:e3151. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.3049.3151.

本文引用的文献

1
Strategies used by nurses to promote teamwork in an emergency room.
Rev Gaucha Enferm. 2016 Mar;37(1):e50178. doi: 10.1590/1983-1447.2016.01.50178. Epub 2016 Feb 26.
2
Instrument to assess the nursing care product: development and content validation.
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2015 Jul-Aug;23(4):642-50. doi: 10.1590/0104-1169.0448.2599.
3
[Meaning of family confrontation for nurses of intensive care units for adult people - Medellín 2013].
Enferm Intensiva. 2015 Oct-Dec;26(4):144-52. doi: 10.1016/j.enfi.2015.07.003. Epub 2015 Sep 5.
5
[Conceptual reflections on health humanization: conception of nurses from Intensive Care Units].
Rev Bras Enferm. 2014 Mar-Apr;67(2):306-11. doi: 10.5935/0034-7167.20140042.
7
[Humanization in nursing care: contribution to the discussion about the National Humanization Policy].
Rev Bras Enferm. 2013 Jul-Aug;66(4):564-70. doi: 10.1590/s0034-71672013000400015.
8
[Comfort and communication measures in nursing caring actions for critically ill patients].
Rev Bras Enferm. 2013 Mar-Apr;66(2):174-9. doi: 10.1590/s0034-71672013000200004.
9
[National Policy of Humanization and education of health care professionals: integrative review].
Rev Bras Enferm. 2013 Jan-Feb;66(1):123-7. doi: 10.1590/s0034-71672013000100019.
10
[Construction and validation of an instrument to assess the Reception with Risk Rating].
Rev Bras Enferm. 2012 Sep-Oct;65(5):751-7. doi: 10.1590/s0034-71672012000500006.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验