Pérez-Castilla Alejandro, García-Ramos Amador, Padial Paulino, Morales-Artacho Antonio J, Feriche Belén
a Department of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences , University of Granada , Granada , Spain.
b Facultad de Educación , Universidad Católica de la Santísima Concepción , Concepción , Chile.
J Sports Sci. 2018 Jun;36(12):1331-1339. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2017.1376900. Epub 2017 Sep 11.
This study compared the effects of two velocity loss thresholds during a power-oriented resistance training program on the mechanical capacities of lower-body muscles. Twenty men were counterbalanced in two groups (VL10 and VL20) based on their maximum power capacity. Both groups used the same exercises, relative intensity and repetition volume, only differing in the velocity loss threshold of each set (VL10: 10% vs. VL20: 20%). Pre- and post-training assessments included an incremental loading test and a 15-m linear sprint to assess the force- and load-velocity relationships and athletic performance variables, respectively. No significant between-group differences (P > 0.05) were observed for the force-velocity relationship parameters (ES range = 0.15-0.42), the MPV attained against different external loads (ES range = 0.02-0.18) or the 15-m sprint time (ES = 0.09). A high between-participants variability was reported for the number of repetitions completed in each training set (CV = 30.3% for VL10 and 29.4% for VL20). These results suggest that both velocity loss thresholds induce similar changes on the lower-body function. The high and variable number of repetitions completed may compromise the velocity-based approach for prescribing and monitoring the repetition volume during a power-oriented resistance training program conducted with the countermovement jump exercise.
本研究比较了在以力量为导向的阻力训练计划中,两个速度损失阈值对下肢肌肉力学能力的影响。根据最大力量能力,20名男性被平衡分为两组(VL10和VL20)。两组使用相同的练习、相对强度和重复量,仅每组的速度损失阈值不同(VL10:10%对VL20:20%)。训练前和训练后的评估分别包括递增负荷测试和15米直线冲刺,以评估力与负荷-速度关系以及运动表现变量。在力-速度关系参数(效应量范围=0.15-0.42)、针对不同外部负荷达到的最大功率速度(效应量范围=0.02-0.18)或15米冲刺时间(效应量=0.09)方面,未观察到显著的组间差异(P>0.05)。报告显示,每个训练组完成的重复次数在参与者之间存在很大差异(VL10组的变异系数为30.3%,VL20组为29.4%)。这些结果表明,两个速度损失阈值对下肢功能产生相似的变化。在进行反向移动跳跃练习的以力量为导向的阻力训练计划中,完成的重复次数较多且变化较大,可能会影响基于速度的方法来规定和监测重复量。