• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

艺术有什么用?艺术的社会认知价值。

What Is Art Good For? The Socio-Epistemic Value of Art.

作者信息

Sherman Aleksandra, Morrissey Clair

机构信息

Department of Cognitive Science, Occidental CollegeLos Angeles, CA, United States.

Department of Philosophy, Occidental CollegeLos Angeles, CA, United States.

出版信息

Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Aug 28;11:411. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00411. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2017.00411
PMID:28894418
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5581397/
Abstract

Scientists, humanists, and art lovers alike value art not just for its beauty, but also for its social and epistemic importance; that is, for its communicative nature, its capacity to increase one's self-knowledge and encourage personal growth, and its ability to challenge our schemas and preconceptions. However, empirical research tends to discount the importance of such social and epistemic outcomes of art engagement, instead focusing on individuals' preferences, judgments of beauty, pleasure, or other emotional appraisals as the primary outcomes of art appreciation. Here, we argue that a systematic neuroscientific study of art appreciation must move beyond understanding aesthetics alone, and toward investigating the social importance of art appreciation. We make our argument for such a shift in focus first, by situating art appreciation as an active social practice. We follow by reviewing the available psychological and cognitive neuroscientific evidence that art appreciation cultivates socio-epistemic skills such as self- and other-understanding, and discuss philosophical frameworks which suggest a more comprehensive empirical investigation. Finally, we argue that focusing on the socio-epistemic values of art engagement highlights the important role art plays in our lives. Empirical research on art appreciation can thus be used to show that engagement with art has specific social and personal value, the cultivation of which is important to us as individuals, and as communities.

摘要

科学家、人文学者和艺术爱好者都重视艺术,不仅因其美,还因其社会和认知重要性;也就是说,因其交际本质、增进自我认知和促进个人成长的能力,以及挑战我们的模式和先入之见的能力。然而,实证研究往往忽视艺术参与的此类社会和认知结果的重要性,而是将重点放在个人偏好、对美的判断、愉悦感或其他情感评估上,将其作为艺术欣赏的主要结果。在此,我们认为,对艺术欣赏进行系统的神经科学研究必须超越仅理解美学,而转向研究艺术欣赏的社会重要性。我们首先通过将艺术欣赏定位为一种积极的社会实践来论证这种重点的转变。接着,我们回顾现有的心理学和认知神经科学证据,即艺术欣赏培养诸如自我理解和他人理解等社会认知技能,并讨论一些哲学框架,这些框架建议进行更全面的实证研究。最后,我们认为关注艺术参与的社会认知价值凸显了艺术在我们生活中所起的重要作用。因此,关于艺术欣赏的实证研究可用于表明参与艺术具有特定的社会和个人价值,培养这种价值对我们作为个体以及作为群体而言都很重要。

相似文献

1
What Is Art Good For? The Socio-Epistemic Value of Art.艺术有什么用?艺术的社会认知价值。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Aug 28;11:411. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00411. eCollection 2017.
2
Wonder, appreciation, and the value of art.惊叹、欣赏与艺术的价值。
Prog Brain Res. 2018;237:107-128. doi: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2018.03.004. Epub 2018 May 3.
3
Philosophical aesthetics and cognitive science.哲学美学与认知科学。
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2018 Jan;9(1). doi: 10.1002/wcs.1445. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
4
Commentary: What Is Art Good For? The Socio-Epistemic Value of Art.评论:艺术有何益处?艺术的社会认知价值
Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Dec 8;11:602. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00602. eCollection 2017.
5
Response to: Commentary: What Is Art Good For? The Socio-Epistemic Value of Art.回应:评论:艺术有何益处?艺术的社会认知价值
Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 Jun 7;12:237. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00237. eCollection 2018.
6
The artful mind meets art history: toward a psycho-historical framework for the science of art appreciation.巧思与艺术史相遇:为艺术欣赏科学构建心理历史学框架。
Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Apr;36(2):123-37. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000489.
7
Contextual and social variables modulate aesthetic appreciation of bodily and abstract art stimuli.情境和社会变量调节对身体艺术和抽象艺术刺激的审美欣赏。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2019 Aug;199:102881. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.102881. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
8
Beyond beauty: Does visual art facilitate social cognitive skills?超越美:视觉艺术是否有助于社会认知技能?
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 4;19(10):e0308392. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308392. eCollection 2024.
9
Introduction: Art and the brain: From pleasure to well-being.引言:艺术与大脑:从愉悦到幸福。
Prog Brain Res. 2018;237:xxvii-xlvi. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(18)30032-3.
10
Beauty: neglected, but alive and kicking.美:虽被忽视,但依然活跃且充满活力。
Br J Psychol. 2014 Nov;105(4):468-70. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12083.

引用本文的文献

1
Effective strategies for teachers to guide children's art activities: based on a survey of children's art activities and teacher guidance, and an analysis of their correlation.教师指导儿童艺术活动的有效策略:基于对儿童艺术活动和教师指导的调查及二者相关性分析
Front Psychol. 2025 Jul 31;16:1600401. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1600401. eCollection 2025.
2
Selective emotion regulation in creative art production: Psychophysiological reactivity during painting reduces anxiety.创意艺术创作中的选择性情绪调节:绘画过程中的心理生理反应可减轻焦虑。
iScience. 2025 Apr 28;28(6):112543. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.112543. eCollection 2025 Jun 20.
3
A Personal Perspective on Psychology of Aesthetics and the Arts: Ecologically Valid, Interdisciplinary, and Diverse Methodologies.美学与艺术心理学的个人视角:生态效度、跨学科性与多样方法论
Creat Res J. 2023 Nov 7;37(2):293-300. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2023.2269339. eCollection 2025.
4
Aesthetic experiences and their transformative power: a systematic review.审美体验及其变革力量:一项系统综述。
Front Psychol. 2024 Oct 3;15:1328449. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1328449. eCollection 2024.
5
Empathy strengthens the effect of emotion on beauty.同理心会增强情感对美的影响。
Res Sq. 2024 Sep 11:rs.3.rs-4920639. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4920639/v1.
6
The role of the body in the experience of installation art: a case study of visitors' bodily, emotional, and transformative experiences in Tomás Saraceno's "".身体在装置艺术体验中的作用:以参观者在托马斯·萨拉切诺的《》中的身体、情感及转变性体验为例的研究
Front Psychol. 2023 Jul 17;14:1192689. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1192689. eCollection 2023.
7
Humans versus AI: whether and why we prefer human-created compared to AI-created artwork.人类与人工智能:我们为何以及为何更喜欢人类创作的艺术作品而不是人工智能创作的艺术作品。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2023 Jul 4;8(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s41235-023-00499-6.
8
More Than Meets the Eye: Art Engages the Social Brain.表象之外:艺术激活社交大脑
Front Neurosci. 2022 Feb 25;16:738865. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.738865. eCollection 2022.
9
Loss and beauty: how experts and novices judge paintings with lacunae.缺失与美:专家与新手如何评判有残损的画作。
Psychol Res. 2021 Jul;85(5):1838-1847. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01370-9. Epub 2020 Jun 6.
10
Arts for ageing well: a propensity score matching analysis of the effects of arts engagements on holistic well-being among older Asian adults above 50 years of age.艺术与健康老龄化:一项针对 50 岁以上亚洲老年人艺术参与对整体幸福感影响的倾向评分匹配分析。
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 21;9(11):e029555. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029555.

本文引用的文献

1
The emotional power of poetry: neural circuitry, psychophysiology and compositional principles.诗歌的情感力量:神经回路、心理生理学与创作原则
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2017 Aug 1;12(8):1229-1240. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsx069.
2
Move me, astonish me… delight my eyes and brain: The Vienna Integrated Model of top-down and bottom-up processes in Art Perception (VIMAP) and corresponding affective, evaluative, and neurophysiological correlates.打动我,震撼我……愉悦我的眼与脑:维也纳自上而下和自下而上加工的艺术知觉统合模型(VIMAP)及其相应的情感、评价和神经生理学关联。
Phys Life Rev. 2017 Jul;21:80-125. doi: 10.1016/j.plrev.2017.02.003. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
3
Empathy, Einfühlung, and aesthetic experience: the effect of emotion contagion on appreciation of representational and abstract art using fEMG and SCR.同理心、感同身受与审美体验:运用肌电描记术和皮肤电反应研究情绪感染对具象艺术和抽象艺术欣赏的影响
Cogn Process. 2018 May;19(2):147-165. doi: 10.1007/s10339-017-0800-2. Epub 2017 Mar 17.
4
Tears Falling on Goosebumps: Co-occurrence of Emotional Lacrimation and Emotional Piloerection Indicates a Psychophysiological Climax in Emotional Arousal.泪洒鸡皮疙瘩:情绪性流泪与情绪性竖毛同时出现表明情绪唤起时的心理生理高潮。
Front Psychol. 2017 Feb 7;8:41. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00041. eCollection 2017.
5
The Distancing-Embracing model of the enjoyment of negative emotions in art reception.艺术接受中负面情绪享受的距离-拥抱模型。
Behav Brain Sci. 2017 Jan;40:e347. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X17000309. Epub 2017 Feb 20.
6
Emotional Empathy and Facial Mimicry for Static and Dynamic Facial Expressions of Fear and Disgust.对恐惧和厌恶的静态及动态面部表情的情感共鸣与面部模仿
Front Psychol. 2016 Nov 23;7:1853. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01853. eCollection 2016.
7
Does reading a single passage of literary fiction really improve theory of mind? An attempt at replication.阅读一段文学小说真的能提高心理理论吗?一项复制尝试。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2016 Nov;111(5):e46-e54. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000064. Epub 2016 Sep 19.
8
Fiction: Simulation of Social Worlds.虚构作品:社会世界的模拟
Trends Cogn Sci. 2016 Aug;20(8):618-628. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.06.002. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
9
Visualizing the Impact of Art: An Update and Comparison of Current Psychological Models of Art Experience.可视化艺术的影响:艺术体验当前心理学模型的更新与比较
Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Apr 26;10:160. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00160. eCollection 2016.
10
Neuroaesthetics: The Cognitive Neuroscience of Aesthetic Experience.神经美学:审美体验的认知神经科学。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2016 Mar;11(2):265-79. doi: 10.1177/1745691615621274.