• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Examining Protective Factors Against Violence among High-risk Youth: Findings from the Seattle Social Development Project.审视高危青少年中预防暴力的保护因素:来自西雅图社会发展项目的研究结果
J Crim Justice. 2016 Jun;45:19-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2016.02.015. Epub 2016 Feb 28.
2
Childhood and Adolescent Risk and Protective Factors for Violence in Adulthood.儿童期和青少年期成年后暴力行为的风险与保护因素
J Crim Justice. 2016 Jun;45:26-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2016.02.005. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
3
Risk versus direct protective factors and youth violence: Seattle social development project.风险因素与直接保护因素和青少年暴力:西雅图社会发展项目。
Am J Prev Med. 2012 Aug;43(2 Suppl 1):S41-56. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.04.030.
4
Risk and direct protective factors for youth violence: results from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health.青少年暴力的风险和直接保护因素:来自全国青少年健康纵向研究的结果。
Am J Prev Med. 2012 Aug;43(2 Suppl 1):S57-66. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.04.023.
5
Childhood risk factors for persistence of violence in the transition to adulthood: a social development perspective.从社会发展视角看儿童期危险因素对向成年期过渡阶段暴力行为持续存在的影响
Violence Vict. 2001 Aug;16(4):355-69.
6
Violence Victimization, Social Support, and Papanicolaou Smear Outcomes: A Longitudinal Study from Adolescence to Young Adulthood.暴力受害经历、社会支持与巴氏涂片检查结果:一项从青春期到青年期的纵向研究。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2017 Dec;26(12):1340-1349. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2016.5799. Epub 2017 Apr 17.
7
Impact of a universal school-based violence prevention program on violent delinquency: distinctive benefits for youth with maltreatment histories.一项基于学校的普遍性暴力预防计划对暴力犯罪的影响:对有虐待史的青少年有独特的益处。
Child Abuse Negl. 2011 Jun;35(6):393-400. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2011.03.002. Epub 2011 Jun 8.
8
The Longitudinal Relation Between Community Violence Exposure and Academic Engagement During Adolescence: Exploring Families' Protective Role.社区暴力暴露与青少年学业参与的纵向关系:探索家庭的保护作用。
J Interpers Violence. 2020 Sep;35(17-18):3264-3285. doi: 10.1177/0886260517708404. Epub 2017 May 15.
9
Violence perpetration among urban american Indian youth: can protection offset risk?美国城市印第安青年中的暴力行为:保护因素能否抵消风险?
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005 Mar;159(3):270-7. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.159.3.270.
10
Social inequality in youth violence: The role of heavy episodic drinking.青少年暴力中的社会不平等:重度间歇性饮酒的作用。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2018 Feb;37(2):162-169. doi: 10.1111/dar.12582. Epub 2017 Jun 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk and Protective Factors of Depression in Family and School Domains for Chinese Early Adolescents: An Association Rule Mining Approach.中国青少年早期家庭和学校领域中抑郁的风险与保护因素:一种关联规则挖掘方法
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Oct 29;13(11):893. doi: 10.3390/bs13110893.
2
Identifying and predicting criminal career profiles from adolescence to age 39.识别并预测从青春期到39岁的犯罪生涯概况。
Crim Behav Ment Health. 2020 Aug;30(4):210-220. doi: 10.1002/cbm.2156. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
3
Risk and protective family factors during childhood on youth violence among African American males: The role of mothers and nonresident fathers.儿童期和青少年期的风险和保护家庭因素对非裔美国男性暴力行为的影响:母亲和非居住父亲的作用。
J Community Psychol. 2020 Jul;48(5):1543-1563. doi: 10.1002/jcop.22346. Epub 2020 Mar 28.
4
Longitudinal Associations among Depression, substance Abuse, and Crime: A Test of competing Hypotheses for Driving Mechanisms.抑郁、药物滥用与犯罪之间的纵向关联:对驱动机制的竞争性假设的检验
J Crim Justice. 2019 May-Jun;62:50-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2018.08.005. Epub 2018 Sep 8.
5
Disrupting the link between maltreatment and delinquency: how school, family, and community factors can be protective.破坏虐待与犯罪之间的联系:学校、家庭和社区因素如何起到保护作用。
BMC Public Health. 2019 May 17;19(1):588. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6906-y.
6
Optimizing Assessment of Risk and Protection for Diverse Adolescent Outcomes: Do Risk and Protective Factors for Delinquency and Substance Use Also Predict Risky Sexual Behavior?优化对不同青少年结局的风险和保护因素的评估:犯罪和物质使用的风险和保护因素是否也可以预测危险性行为?
Prev Sci. 2019 Jul;20(5):788-799. doi: 10.1007/s11121-019-0987-9.
7
The Potential Protective Role of Peer Relationships on School Engagement in At-Risk Adolescents.同伴关系对高危青少年学校参与的潜在保护作用。
J Youth Adolesc. 2017 Nov;46(11):2255-2272. doi: 10.1007/s10964-017-0644-1. Epub 2017 Feb 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Peer Influences on Adolescent Decision Making.同伴对青少年决策的影响。
Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2013 Apr;22(2):114-120. doi: 10.1177/0963721412471347.
2
The social development model: An integrated approach to delinquency prevention.社会发展模式:预防犯罪的综合方法。
J Prim Prev. 1985 Dec;6(2):73-97. doi: 10.1007/BF01325432.
3
Cumulative risk and child development.累积风险与儿童发展。
Psychol Bull. 2013 Nov;139(6):1342-96. doi: 10.1037/a0031808. Epub 2013 Apr 8.
4
Direct protective and buffering protective factors in the development of youth violence.青少年暴力行为发展中的直接保护因素和缓冲保护因素。
Am J Prev Med. 2012 Aug;43(2 Suppl 1):S8-S23. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.04.029.
5
Risk and direct protective factors for youth violence: results from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Multisite Violence Prevention Project.青少年暴力的风险和直接保护因素:来自疾病控制和预防中心多地点暴力预防项目的结果。
Am J Prev Med. 2012 Aug;43(2 Suppl 1):S67-75. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.04.025.
6
Risk and direct protective factors for youth violence: results from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health.青少年暴力的风险和直接保护因素:来自全国青少年健康纵向研究的结果。
Am J Prev Med. 2012 Aug;43(2 Suppl 1):S57-66. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.04.023.
7
Risk versus direct protective factors and youth violence: Seattle social development project.风险因素与直接保护因素和青少年暴力:西雅图社会发展项目。
Am J Prev Med. 2012 Aug;43(2 Suppl 1):S41-56. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.04.030.
8
Identifying direct protective factors for nonviolence.识别非暴力的直接保护因素。
Am J Prev Med. 2012 Aug;43(2 Suppl 1):S28-40. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.04.024.
9
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Expert Panel on Protective Factors for Youth Violence Perpetration: background and overview.疾病控制与预防中心的青少年暴力犯罪保护因素专家小组:背景与概述。
Am J Prev Med. 2012 Aug;43(2 Suppl 1):S1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.04.026.
10
The relationship between cumulative risk and promotive factors and violent behavior among urban adolescents.累积风险与促进因素和城市青少年暴力行为之间的关系。
Am J Community Psychol. 2013 Mar;51(1-2):57-65. doi: 10.1007/s10464-012-9541-7.

审视高危青少年中预防暴力的保护因素:来自西雅图社会发展项目的研究结果

Examining Protective Factors Against Violence among High-risk Youth: Findings from the Seattle Social Development Project.

作者信息

Elizabeth Kim B K, Gilman Amanda B, Hill Karl G, Hawkins J David

机构信息

University of California, Berkeley, School of Social Welfare, University of Washington.

Washington State Center for Court Research, University of Washington.

出版信息

J Crim Justice. 2016 Jun;45:19-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2016.02.015. Epub 2016 Feb 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2016.02.015
PMID:28979052
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5624317/
Abstract

PURPOSE

This paper examined proximal and distal effects of protective factors specified in the social development model (SDM) on youth violence among high-risk youth.

METHODS

Data come from the Seattle Social Development Project, a longitudinal study of development from childhood into adulthood. A community sample of 808 participants from the Seattle Public School District was surveyed from the 5th grade through adulthood. This paper uses data from participants' adolescent years, ages 10-18.

RESULTS

Higher levels of protective factors in early and middle adolescence reduced the odds of violence during late adolescence in the full sample and in two different risk groups (high cumulative risk and low SES). Although risk exposure increased the odds of violence, protective factors in middle adolescence predicted lower odds of violence during late adolescence. Importantly, protective factors had a greater effect in reducing violence among youth exposed to high levels of cumulative risk than among youth exposed to lower levels of cumulative risk. This difference was not observed between youth from higher and lower SES families.

CONCLUSION

Protective factors specified in the SDM appear to reduce violence in late adolescence even among youth from low SES families and youth exposed to high levels of cumulative risk.

摘要

目的

本文探讨了社会发展模型(SDM)中所明确的保护因素对高危青少年暴力行为的近端和远端影响。

方法

数据来自西雅图社会发展项目,这是一项从童年到成年期的纵向发展研究。对来自西雅图公立学区的808名参与者组成的社区样本从五年级到成年期进行了调查。本文使用了参与者10至18岁青少年时期的数据。

结果

在整个样本以及两个不同风险组(高累积风险组和低社会经济地位组)中,青少年早期和中期较高水平的保护因素降低了青少年晚期暴力行为的几率。尽管暴露于风险会增加暴力行为的几率,但青少年中期的保护因素预示着青少年晚期暴力行为的几率较低。重要的是,与暴露于较低累积风险水平的青少年相比,保护因素在减少暴露于高水平累积风险的青少年暴力行为方面具有更大的作用。在社会经济地位较高和较低家庭的青少年之间未观察到这种差异。

结论

社会发展模型中所明确的保护因素似乎能减少青少年晚期的暴力行为,即使是来自低社会经济地位家庭以及暴露于高水平累积风险的青少年。