• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根管封闭剂对人牙周膜成纤维细胞活力的影响:体外研究

Effect of root canal sealers on human periodontal ligament fibroblast viability: ex vivo study.

作者信息

Szczurko Grzegorz, Pawińska Małgorzata, Łuczaj-Cepowicz Elżbieta, Kierklo Anna, Marczuk-Kolada Grażyna, Hołownia Adam

机构信息

Department of Integrated Dentistry, Medical University of Białystok, M. Skłodowska-Curie Street 24A, 15-276, Białystok, Poland.

Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Medical University of Białystok, J. Waszyngton Street 15A, 15-274, Białystok, Poland.

出版信息

Odontology. 2018 Jul;106(3):245-256. doi: 10.1007/s10266-017-0329-y. Epub 2017 Dec 14.

DOI:10.1007/s10266-017-0329-y
PMID:29243186
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5995990/
Abstract

The aim of the study was to compare ex vivo the toxic effects of six root canal sealers immediately after mixing or setting on human periodontal ligament fibroblasts (HPdLF). Freshly mixed (I group) or set (allowed to dry for 24 h) (II group) specimens of AH Plus Jet (AH), Apexit Plus (AP), MTA Fillapex (FL), GuttaFlow (GF), MetaSEAL Soft (META), and Tubli-Seal (TS) were prepared. HPdLF were exposed for 24 h to the specimens. 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazolo-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay was used to examine the effect of the root canal sealers on mitochondrial metabolic activity. Fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-annexin V (AnV) and propidium iodide staining followed by flow cytometry was used to identify the effects of the materials on cell apoptosis/necrosis. Statistical analyses were performed by one-way ANOVA followed by post hoc tests, and significance was determined at P < 0.05. Most materials from the two groups reduced the viability of the cultured cells compared with the control group (P < 0.05). Statistical analysis showed significant differences in HPdLF viability between the individual materials in each group (P < 0.001). AH and AP induced a significant increase in the percentage of apoptotic cells, while TS, FL, and META elevated the proportion of necrotic cells compared with other materials and the controls (p < 0.05). The cytotoxic effects of the tested root canal sealers (both fresh and set) on HPdLF varied. Both forms of sealers were able to cause toxic effects by inducing apoptosis and necrosis in HPdLF. The cytotoxicity of FL, META, TS was mainly associated with necrosis, while AH and AP with apoptosis.

摘要

本研究的目的是在体外比较六种根管封闭剂在混合或凝固后立即对人牙周膜成纤维细胞(HPdLF)的毒性作用。制备了AH Plus Jet(AH)、Apexit Plus(AP)、MTA Fillapex(FL)、GuttaFlow(GF)、MetaSEAL Soft(META)和Tubli-Seal(TS)的新鲜混合样本(I组)或凝固样本(晾干24小时)(II组)。将HPdLF暴露于这些样本24小时。采用3-(4,5-二甲基噻唑-2-基)-2,5-二苯基四氮唑溴盐法检测根管封闭剂对线粒体代谢活性的影响。采用异硫氰酸荧光素(FITC)-膜联蛋白V(AnV)和碘化丙啶染色,随后进行流式细胞术,以确定材料对细胞凋亡/坏死的影响。采用单因素方差分析及事后检验进行统计分析,以P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。与对照组相比,两组中的大多数材料均降低了培养细胞的活力(P<0.05)。统计分析表明,每组中各材料之间HPdLF活力存在显著差异(P<0.001)。与其他材料及对照组相比,AH和AP诱导凋亡细胞百分比显著增加,而TS、FL和META则使坏死细胞比例升高(P<0.05)。测试的根管封闭剂(新鲜和凝固的)对HPdLF的细胞毒性作用各不相同。两种形式的封闭剂均能够通过诱导HPdLF凋亡和坏死而产生毒性作用。FL、META、TS的细胞毒性主要与坏死相关,而AH和AP的细胞毒性主要与凋亡相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb92/5995990/869f5d9f6dfb/10266_2017_329_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb92/5995990/4cd6798e4354/10266_2017_329_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb92/5995990/c86d79ebf7d3/10266_2017_329_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb92/5995990/82b248c7f902/10266_2017_329_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb92/5995990/800a2a33c41f/10266_2017_329_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb92/5995990/869f5d9f6dfb/10266_2017_329_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb92/5995990/4cd6798e4354/10266_2017_329_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb92/5995990/c86d79ebf7d3/10266_2017_329_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb92/5995990/82b248c7f902/10266_2017_329_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb92/5995990/800a2a33c41f/10266_2017_329_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb92/5995990/869f5d9f6dfb/10266_2017_329_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of root canal sealers on human periodontal ligament fibroblast viability: ex vivo study.根管封闭剂对人牙周膜成纤维细胞活力的影响:体外研究
Odontology. 2018 Jul;106(3):245-256. doi: 10.1007/s10266-017-0329-y. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
2
Comparative Evaluation of Cytotoxicity of Root Canal Sealers on Cultured Human Periodontal Fibroblasts: In vitro Study.根管封闭剂对培养的人牙周膜成纤维细胞细胞毒性的比较评价:体外研究
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018 Jul 1;19(7):847-852.
3
Evaluation of the biocompatibility of root canal sealers on human periodontal ligament cells ex vivo.评价根管封闭剂对人牙周膜细胞的体外生物相容性。
Odontology. 2019 Jan;107(1):54-63. doi: 10.1007/s10266-018-0380-3. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
4
Evaluation of cytocompatibility of calcium silicate-based endodontic sealers and their effects on the biological responses of mesenchymal dental stem cells.硅酸钙基根管封闭剂的细胞相容性及其对间充质牙干细胞生物学反应的影响评估。
Int Endod J. 2017 Jan;50(1):67-76. doi: 10.1111/iej.12596. Epub 2016 Jan 22.
5
A comparative assessment of the antibacterial activity of root canal sealers on 2 Actinomyces species: An in vitro study.两种放线菌的根管封闭剂抗菌活性的比较评估:一项体外研究。
Adv Clin Exp Med. 2019 Feb;28(2):243-248. doi: 10.17219/acem/78022.
6
A novel GuttaFlow sealer supports cell survival and attachment.一种新型的GuttaFlow封闭剂可支持细胞存活和附着。
J Endod. 2014 Feb;40(2):231-4. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.08.029. Epub 2013 Oct 15.
7
Cytotoxicity of GuttaFlow Bioseal, GuttaFlow2, MTA Fillapex, and AH Plus on Human Periodontal Ligament Stem Cells.GuttaFlow Bioseal、GuttaFlow2、MTA Fillapex 和 AH Plus 对人牙周膜干细胞的细胞毒性。
J Endod. 2017 May;43(5):816-822. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2017.01.001. Epub 2017 Mar 23.
8
Cytotoxicity evaluation of Gutta Flow and Endo Sequence BC sealers.Gutta Flow和Endo Sequence BC封闭剂的细胞毒性评估。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011 Nov;112(5):657-61. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.03.050. Epub 2011 Jul 20.
9
In vitro biocompatibility, inflammatory response, and osteogenic potential of 4 root canal sealers: Sealapex, Sankin apatite root sealer, MTA Fillapex, and iRoot SP root canal sealer.4种根管封闭剂的体外生物相容性、炎症反应和成骨潜力:Sealapex、三金磷灰石根管封闭剂、MTA Fillapex和iRoot SP根管封闭剂
J Endod. 2014 Oct;40(10):1642-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.04.006. Epub 2014 Jun 7.
10
A comprehensive in vitro comparison of the biological and physicochemical properties of bioactive root canal sealers.一种生物活性根管封闭剂的生物学和理化性能的全面体外比较。
Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Oct;26(10):6209-6222. doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04570-2. Epub 2022 Jun 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of various endodontic sealers on HPDLF Cell viability and apoptosis.各种根管封闭剂对 HPDLF 细胞活力和凋亡的影响。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 8;14(1):27270. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-78344-z.
2
Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of bioceramic root canal sealers compared to conventional resin-based sealer.与传统树脂基根管封闭剂相比,生物陶瓷根管封闭剂的细胞毒性和遗传毒性
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 19;14(1):4124. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-54726-1.
3
Effect of Different Sealers on the Cytocompatibility and Osteogenic Potential of Human Periodontal Ligament Stem Cells: An In Vitro Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of the XTT and resazurin assays for quantification of the metabolic activity of Staphylococcus aureus biofilm.用于定量金黄色葡萄球菌生物膜代谢活性的XTT和刃天青检测法的比较
J Microbiol Methods. 2017 Aug;139:135-137. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2017.06.004. Epub 2017 Jun 3.
2
Immunomodulatory/anti-inflammatory effect of ZOE-based dental materials.基于ZOE的牙科材料的免疫调节/抗炎作用。
Dent Mater. 2017 Jan;33(1):e1-e12. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2016.09.012. Epub 2016 Oct 7.
3
Cytotoxicity and Initial Biocompatibility of Endodontic Biomaterials (MTA and Biodentine™) Used as Root-End Filling Materials.
不同封闭剂对人牙周膜干细胞细胞相容性和成骨潜能的影响:一项体外研究
J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 17;12(6):2344. doi: 10.3390/jcm12062344.
4
toxicogenomic activity of an MTA/salicylate-based endodontic sealer.一种基于MTA/水杨酸盐的根管封闭剂的毒理基因组活性。
Toxicol Rep. 2022 May 4;9:1076-1081. doi: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2022.05.004. eCollection 2022.
5
The Assessment of Quality of the Root Canal Filling and the Number of Visits Needed for Completing Primary Root Canal Treatment by Operators with Different Experience.不同经验的操作者对根管充填质量及完成乳牙根管治疗所需就诊次数的评估
Bioengineering (Basel). 2022 Sep 13;9(9):468. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering9090468.
6
A comprehensive in vitro comparison of the biological and physicochemical properties of bioactive root canal sealers.一种生物活性根管封闭剂的生物学和理化性能的全面体外比较。
Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Oct;26(10):6209-6222. doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04570-2. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
7
Influence of Commonly Used Endodontic Irrigants on the Setting Time and Metal Composition of Various Base Endodontic Sealers.常用根管冲洗剂对各种根管封闭剂凝固时间和金属成分的影响。
Polymers (Basel). 2021 Dec 22;14(1):27. doi: 10.3390/polym14010027.
8
The Structural, Physical, and In Vitro Biological Performance of Freshly Mixed and Set Endodontic Sealers.新鲜混合和凝固的根管封闭剂的结构、物理和体外生物学性能。
Eur Endod J. 2021 Apr;6(1):98-109. doi: 10.14744/eej.2020.36349. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
9
Pleiotropic Effects of Eugenol: The Good, the Bad, and the Unknown.丁香酚的多效作用:好的、坏的和未知的。
Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2021 Mar 2;2021:3165159. doi: 10.1155/2021/3165159. eCollection 2021.
10
Physical Properties, Antimicrobial Activity and In Vivo Tissue Response to Apexit Plus.Apexit Plus的物理性质、抗菌活性及体内组织反应
Materials (Basel). 2020 Mar 5;13(5):1171. doi: 10.3390/ma13051171.
用作根尖充填材料的牙髓生物材料(MTA和生物牙本质™)的细胞毒性和初始生物相容性
Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:7926961. doi: 10.1155/2016/7926961. Epub 2016 Aug 9.
4
Cytocompatibility of calcium silicate-based sealers in a three-dimensional cell culture model.基于硅酸钙的封闭剂在三维细胞培养模型中的细胞相容性
Clin Oral Investig. 2017 Jun;21(5):1531-1536. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1918-9. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
5
Cytotoxic Effects of One-step Self-etching Dental Adhesives on Human Periodontal Ligament Fibroblasts In Vitro.一步自酸蚀牙科粘结剂对人牙周膜成纤维细胞的体外细胞毒性作用
J Adhes Dent. 2016;18(2):99-109. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a35906.
6
Evaluation of cytocompatibility of calcium silicate-based endodontic sealers and their effects on the biological responses of mesenchymal dental stem cells.硅酸钙基根管封闭剂的细胞相容性及其对间充质牙干细胞生物学反应的影响评估。
Int Endod J. 2017 Jan;50(1):67-76. doi: 10.1111/iej.12596. Epub 2016 Jan 22.
7
Biocompatibility and bioactivity of calcium silicate-based endodontic sealers in human dental pulp cells.硅酸钙基根管封闭剂在人牙髓细胞中的生物相容性和生物活性
J Appl Oral Sci. 2015 Oct;23(5):467-71. doi: 10.1590/1678-775720150170.
8
Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of natural resin-based experimental endodontic sealers.天然树脂基实验性根管封闭剂的细胞毒性和遗传毒性。
Clin Oral Investig. 2016 May;20(4):815-9. doi: 10.1007/s00784-015-1567-4. Epub 2015 Aug 29.
9
Cytotoxicity, genotoxicity and antibacterial effectiveness of a bioceramic endodontic sealer.一种生物陶瓷根管封闭剂的细胞毒性、遗传毒性及抗菌效果
Int Endod J. 2016 Sep;49(9):858-864. doi: 10.1111/iej.12523. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
10
Evaluation of Biocompatibility of Root Canal Sealers on L929 Fibroblasts with Multiscan EX Spectrophotometer.使用多扫描EX分光光度计评估根管封闭剂对L929成纤维细胞的生物相容性。
Acta Inform Med. 2015 Jun;23(3):135-7. doi: 10.5455/aim.2015.23.135-137. Epub 2015 May 25.