Suppr超能文献

有效开展患者、照护者、临床医生、学术研究人员和其他利益攸关方之间研究合作的 12 点经验教训

Twelve Lessons Learned for Effective Research Partnerships Between Patients, Caregivers, Clinicians, Academic Researchers, and Other Stakeholders.

机构信息

Department of Family and Emergency Medicine, Laval University, Quebec City, QC, Canada.

Office of Education and Continuing Development, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec City, QC, Canada.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Apr;33(4):558-562. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4269-6. Epub 2018 Jan 4.

Abstract

Research increasingly means that patients, caregivers, health professionals, other stakeholders, and academic investigators work in partnership. This requires effective collaboration rooted in mutual respect, involvement of all participants, and good communication. Having conducted such partnered research over multiple projects, and having recently completed a project together funded by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, we collaboratively developed a list of 12 lessons we have learned about how to ensure effective research partnerships. To foster a culture of mutual respect, hold early in-person meetings, with introductions focused on motivation, offer appropriate orientation for everyone, and maintain awareness of individual and project goals. To actively involve all team members, it is important to ensure sufficient funding for everyone's participation, to ask for and recognize diverse contributions, and to seek the input of quiet members. To facilitate good communication, teams should carefully consider labels, avoid jargon and acronyms, judiciously use homogeneous and heterogeneous subgroups, and keep progress visible. In offering pragmatic, actionable lessons we have learned through our separate and shared experiences, we hope to help foster more patient-centered research via productive and enjoyable research collaborations.

摘要

研究越来越意味着患者、护理人员、卫生专业人员、其他利益攸关方和学术研究人员以伙伴关系共同开展工作。这需要以相互尊重、所有参与者的参与和良好沟通为基础的有效合作。我们通过多个项目进行了这种合作研究,并最近共同完成了一个由患者为中心的成果研究所资助的项目,在此基础上,我们共同制定了一份关于如何确保有效的研究伙伴关系的 12 条经验教训清单。为了培养相互尊重的文化氛围,要尽早举行面对面的会议,重点介绍动机,为每个人提供适当的介绍,并了解个人和项目目标。为了积极参与所有团队成员,确保每个人的参与都有足够的资金是很重要的,要征求并认可多样化的贡献,并寻求安静成员的意见。为了促进良好的沟通,团队应该仔细考虑标签,避免使用行话和缩写词,明智地使用同质和异质的小组,并保持进度可见。通过分享我们在独立和共同经验中学到的实用、可操作的经验教训,我们希望通过富有成效和愉快的研究合作,促进更多以患者为中心的研究。

相似文献

2
Patient and Stakeholder Engagement in the PCORI Pilot Projects: Description and Lessons Learned.
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Jan;31(1):13-21. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3450-z. Epub 2015 Jul 10.
4
Lessons on Patient and Stakeholder Engagement Strategies for Pipeline to Proposal Awards.
Ethn Dis. 2018 Sep 6;28(Suppl 2):303-310. doi: 10.18865/ed.28.S2.303. eCollection 2018.
5
An evaluation of stakeholder engagement in comparative effectiveness research: lessons learned from SWOG S1415CD.
J Comp Eff Res. 2022 Dec;11(18):1313-1321. doi: 10.2217/cer-2022-0158. Epub 2022 Nov 15.
9
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
10
Practical Guidance for Involving Stakeholders in Health Research.
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Mar;34(3):458-463. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4738-6. Epub 2018 Dec 18.

引用本文的文献

1
How does integrated knowledge translation work? A realist review.
Health Res Policy Syst. 2025 Aug 5;23(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12961-025-01374-0.
3
Navigating Complexity: Lessons Learned from Co-Designing a Care Transition Intervention for People with Stroke.
Int J Integr Care. 2025 Apr 24;25(2):3. doi: 10.5334/ijic.8943. eCollection 2025 Apr-Jun.
4
[Making prostate cancer research accessible: chatGPT-4 as a tool to enhance lay communication].
Urologie. 2025 Jun;64(6):574-583. doi: 10.1007/s00120-025-02558-w. Epub 2025 Apr 7.
7
Strengthening research networks: Insights from a clinical research network in Brazil.
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 1;19(8):e0307817. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307817. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Global Health Partnerships for Continuing Medical Education: Lessons from Successful Partnerships.
Health Syst Reform. 2016 Jul 2;2(3):241-253. doi: 10.1080/23288604.2016.1220776.
2
Exploring collaboration in a community-academic partnership.
Public Health Nurs. 2017 Nov;34(6):541-546. doi: 10.1111/phn.12346. Epub 2017 Aug 1.
3
Emerging Guidelines for Patient Engagement in Research.
Value Health. 2017 Mar;20(3):481-486. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.10.003. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
4
The Researcher-Practitioner Partnership Study (RPPS): Experiences From Criminal Justice System Collaborations Studying Violence Against Women.
Violence Against Women. 2017 Jun;23(7):887-907. doi: 10.1177/1077801216650290. Epub 2016 Jun 5.
5
Stakeholder Perspectives on Creating and Maintaining Trust in Community-Academic Research Partnerships.
Health Educ Behav. 2017 Feb;44(1):182-191. doi: 10.1177/1090198116648291. Epub 2016 Jul 9.
8
Patient and Stakeholder Engagement in the PCORI Pilot Projects: Description and Lessons Learned.
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Jan;31(1):13-21. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3450-z. Epub 2015 Jul 10.
10
Building strong research partnerships between public health and researchers: a VA case study.
J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Dec;29 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):831-4. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-3017-4.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验