Longevity Link Corporation, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.
Moran Eye Center, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.
Arch Biochem Biophys. 2018 May 15;646:46-54. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2018.03.033. Epub 2018 Mar 27.
Resonance Raman spectroscopy (RRS) and reflection spectroscopy (RS) are optical methods applicable to the non-invasive detection of carotenoids in human skin. RRS is the older, more thoroughly validated method, whereas RS is newer and has several advantages. Since collective skin carotenoid levels serve as a biomarker for vegetable and fruit intake, both methods hold promise as convenient screening tools for assessment of dietary interventions and correlations between skin carotenoids and health and disease outcomes. In this manuscript, we describe the most recent optimized device configurations and compare their use in various clinical and field settings. Both RRS and RS devices yield a wide range of skin carotenoid levels between subjects, which is a critical feature for a biomarker. Repeatability of the methods is 3-15% depending on the subject's skin carotenoid level and the uniformity of its local distribution. For 54 subjects recruited from an ophthalmology clinic, we first checked the validity of the relatively novel RS methodology via biochemical serum carotenoid measurements, the latter carried out with high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). A high correlation between RS skin and serum HPLC carotenoid levels was established (R = 0.81; p < 0.001). Also, a high correlation was found between RS and RRS skin levels (R = 0.94 p < 0.001). Subsequent comparisons of skin carotenoid measurements in diverse age groups and ethnicities included 569 Japanese adults, 947 children with ages 2-5 screened in 24 day care centers in San Francisco, and 49 predominantly Hispanic adults screened at an outdoor health fair event. Depending on the particular subject group, correlation coefficients between the RRS and RS methods ranged between R ∼0.80 and R ∼0.96. Analysis of the Japanese screening showed that, on average, skin carotenoid levels are higher in women compared to men, skin levels do not depend on age, and tobacco smokers have reduced levels versus non-smokers. For the two most ethnically diverse groups with widely varying melanin levels, we investigated the effect of dermal melanin on RS and RRS skin carotenoid levels. The analysis revealed that large variations in skin carotenoid levels remain detectable independent of the particular melanin index. This behavior is consistent with the absence of melanin effects on the skin carotenoid levels generated with the instrument configurations. The RS method has an advantage over RRS in its relative simplicity. Due to its detection of skin reflection over a wide spectral range from the near UV to the near IR, it has the unique ability to quantify each of the major tissue chromophores and take them into account in the derivation of skin carotenoid levels.
共振拉曼光谱(RRS)和反射光谱(RS)是适用于非侵入性检测人体皮肤中类胡萝卜素的光学方法。RRS 是一种更古老、更经过充分验证的方法,而 RS 是一种较新的方法,具有几个优点。由于皮肤类胡萝卜素的总体水平可作为蔬菜和水果摄入量的生物标志物,因此这两种方法都有望成为评估饮食干预措施以及皮肤类胡萝卜素与健康和疾病结果之间相关性的便捷筛选工具。在本文中,我们描述了最新优化的设备配置,并比较了它们在各种临床和现场环境中的使用情况。RRS 和 RS 两种设备在受试者之间都能产生广泛的皮肤类胡萝卜素水平,这是生物标志物的一个关键特征。方法的重复性为 3-15%,具体取决于受试者的皮肤类胡萝卜素水平及其局部分布的均匀性。我们从眼科诊所招募了 54 名受试者,首先通过高效液相色谱法(HPLC)进行生化血清类胡萝卜素测量,验证了相对较新的 RS 方法的有效性。RS 皮肤和血清 HPLC 类胡萝卜素水平之间建立了高度相关性(R = 0.81;p < 0.001)。此外,还发现 RS 和 RRS 皮肤水平之间存在高度相关性(R = 0.94,p < 0.001)。随后在不同年龄段和种族的人群中比较了皮肤类胡萝卜素的测量值,其中包括 569 名日本成年人、947 名年龄在 2-5 岁的旧金山 24 家日托中心的儿童以及 49 名主要为西班牙裔的成年人在户外健康博览会上进行了筛查。根据特定的受试者群体,RRS 和 RS 方法之间的相关系数范围在 R ∼0.80 到 R ∼0.96 之间。对日本筛查的分析表明,平均而言,女性的皮肤类胡萝卜素水平高于男性,皮肤水平与年龄无关,吸烟者的水平低于不吸烟者。对于两个种族差异最大、黑色素水平差异最大的人群,我们研究了真皮黑色素对 RS 和 RRS 皮肤类胡萝卜素水平的影响。分析表明,在不考虑特定黑色素指数的情况下,仍可检测到皮肤类胡萝卜素水平的大幅变化。这种行为与仪器配置产生的皮肤类胡萝卜素水平的黑色素影响无关。RS 方法比 RRS 方法具有相对简单的优势。由于它可以检测从近紫外到近红外的宽光谱范围内的皮肤反射,因此它具有量化每个主要组织色素并在推导皮肤类胡萝卜素水平时将其考虑在内的独特能力。