Cai Xixi, Huang Lingyan, Yang Guiqin, Yu Zhen, Wen Junlin, Zhou Shungui
Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Soil Environmental Health and Regulation, College of Resources and Environment, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China.
Guangdong Key Laboratory of Integrated Agro-Environmental Pollution Control and Management, Guangdong Institute of Eco-Environmental Science and Technology, Guangzhou, China.
Front Microbiol. 2018 Jun 15;9:1075. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01075. eCollection 2018.
The ability of species to transfer electrons outside cells enables them to play an important role in biogeochemical and bioenergy processes. Our knowledge of the extracellular electron transfer (EET) process in the genus is mainly from the study of , and in order to fully investigate the EET mechanisms in the genus , other species should also be considered. This study focused on the EET of GSS01, which exhibited a capability of reducing insoluble Fe(III) oxides and generating electrical current comparable with PCA. Electrochemical characterization, including cyclic voltammetry, differential pulse voltammetry, and electrochemical FTIR spectra, revealed that different redox proteins contributed to the electrochemical behaviors of and . Based on comparative transcriptomic and proteomic analyses, OmcS was the most upregulated protein in both and cells grown with insoluble Fe(III) oxides vs. soluble electron acceptor. However, the proteins including OmcE and PilA that were previously reported as being important for EET in were downregulated or unchanged in cells grown with insoluble electron acceptors vs. soluble electron acceptor, and many proteins that were upregulated in cells grown with insoluble electron acceptors vs. soluble electron acceptor, such as OmcN, are not important for EET in . We also identified 30 differentially expressed small RNAs (sRNAs) in cells grown with different acceptors. Taken together, these findings help to understand the versatile EET mechanisms that exist in the genus and point to the possibility of sRNA in modulating EET gene expression.
物种在细胞外转移电子的能力使其能够在生物地球化学和生物能源过程中发挥重要作用。我们对该属细胞外电子转移(EET)过程的了解主要来自于对[具体物种]的研究,为了全面研究该属的EET机制,还应考虑其他[该属]物种。本研究聚焦于GSS01的EET,它表现出还原不溶性Fe(III)氧化物和产生与[PCA]相当电流的能力。电化学表征,包括循环伏安法、差分脉冲伏安法和电化学傅里叶变换红外光谱,表明不同的氧化还原蛋白对[具体物种1]和[具体物种2]的电化学行为有贡献。基于比较转录组学和蛋白质组学分析,在以不溶性Fe(III)氧化物生长的[具体物种1]和[具体物种2]细胞中,相对于可溶性电子受体,OmcS是上调最多的蛋白质。然而,先前报道对[具体物种1]的EET很重要的包括OmcE和PilA等蛋白质,在以不溶性电子受体生长的[具体物种2]细胞中相对于可溶性电子受体下调或不变,并且许多在以不溶性电子受体生长的[具体物种2]细胞中相对于可溶性电子受体上调的蛋白质,如OmcN,对[具体物种1]的EET并不重要。我们还在以不同受体生长的[具体物种2]细胞中鉴定出30种差异表达的小RNA(sRNA)。综上所述,这些发现有助于理解该属中存在的多种EET机制,并指出了sRNA调节EET基因表达的可能性。
Microbiology (Reading). 2013-1-10
Front Microbiol. 2023-10-10
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005-12
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2025-5-21
Front Microbiol. 2021-1-11
Microorganisms. 2020-4-27
Front Microbiol. 2017-12-12
Front Microbiol. 2017-6-15
Front Microbiol. 2016-11-14
Stand Genomic Sci. 2015-12-2