评估自我报告的长处与困难问卷的可读性。
Assessing the readability of the self-reported Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire.
作者信息
Patalay Praveetha, Hayes Daniel, Wolpert Miranda
机构信息
University of Liverpool, UK, Evidence Based Practice Unit, UCL, London, UK, and Anna Freud National Centre for Children and Families, London, UK.
Evidence Based Practice Unit, UCL, London, UK and Anna Freud National Centre for Children and Families, London, UK.
出版信息
BJPsych Open. 2018 Feb 22;4(2):55-57. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2017.13. eCollection 2018 Mar.
Abstract
UNLABELLED
The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is one of the most widely used measures in child and adolescent mental health in clinical practice, community-based screening and research. Assessing the readability of such questionnaires is important as young people may not comprehend items above their reading ability when self-reporting. Analyses of readability in the present study indicate that the self-report SDQ might not be suitable for young people with a reading age below 13-14 years and highlight differences in readability between subscales. The findings suggest a need for caution in using the SDQ as a self-report measure for children below the age of 13, and highlight considerations of readability in measure development, selection and interpretation.
DECLARATION OF INTEREST
None.
摘要
未标注
《长处与困难问卷》（SDQ）是临床实践、社区筛查及研究中儿童和青少年心理健康领域应用最广泛的测评工具之一。评估此类问卷的可读性很重要，因为青少年在自我报告时可能无法理解超出其阅读能力的题目。本研究中的可读性分析表明，自我报告版的SDQ可能不适用于阅读年龄低于13 - 14岁的青少年，并凸显了各分量表在可读性上的差异。研究结果表明，在将SDQ用作13岁以下儿童的自我报告测评工具时需谨慎，并强调了在测评工具开发、选择及解读过程中对可读性的考量。
利益声明
无。
相似文献
1
Assessing the readability of the self-reported Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire.评估自我报告的长处与困难问卷的可读性。
BJPsych Open. 2018 Feb 22;4(2):55-57. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2017.13. eCollection 2018 Mar.
2
Revising the self-report strengths and difficulties questionnaire for cross-country comparisons of adolescent mental health problems: the SDQ-R.修订自陈式长处与困难问卷以进行青少年心理健康问题的跨国比较：SDQ-R。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2019 May 3;29:e35. doi: 10.1017/S2045796019000246.
3
Normative Data of the Self-Report Version of the German Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in an Epidemiological Setting.德国优势与困难问卷自陈版在流行病学背景下的常模数据。
Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr Psychother. 2018 Nov;46(6):523-533. doi: 10.1024/1422-4917/a000589. Epub 2018 May 30.
4
5
Validation of the parent version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) to screen mental health problems among school-age children in Mongolia.验证父母版长处和困难问卷（SDQ）在蒙古筛查学龄儿童心理健康问题的适用性。
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Apr 29;21(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03218-x.
6
Age Appropriateness of the Self-Report Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire.自陈式长处与困难问卷的年龄适宜性。
Assessment. 2021 Sep;28(6):1556-1569. doi: 10.1177/1073191120903382. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
7
Readability of Commonly Used Quality of Life Outcome Measures for Youth Self-Report.常用青少年自报告生活质量结局测量工具的可读性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 3;19(15):9555. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159555.
8
Psychometric properties of the parent strengths and difficulties questionnaire in the general population of German children and adolescents: results of the BELLA study.德国儿童和青少年普通人群中父母版优势与困难问卷的心理测量特性：贝拉研究结果
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2008 Dec;17 Suppl 1:99-105. doi: 10.1007/s00787-008-1011-2.
9
Psychometric properties of the Arabic self-report version of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire.优势与困难问卷阿拉伯语自陈版本的心理测量特性
Res Dev Disabil. 2016 Dec;59:211-220. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2016.09.002. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
10
Dutch norms for the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) - parent form for children aged 2-18 years.荷兰版《长处和困难问卷》（SDQ）- 家长用 2-18 岁儿童版。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Jun 14;16(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-0948-1.
引用本文的文献
1
Validity of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire for Screening and Diagnosis in Western Australian Adolescents.《长处与困难问卷》在西澳大利亚青少年筛查与诊断中的效度
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Oct 30;14(21):2433. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14212433.
2
Adolescent-Mother Attachment and Dyadic Affective Processes: Predictors of Internalizing and Externalizing Symptoms.青少年与母亲的依恋关系及二元情感过程：内化和外化症状的预测因素。
J Youth Adolesc. 2025 Mar;54(3):736-749. doi: 10.1007/s10964-024-02091-7. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
3
Measures Determining Dementia-Related Attitudes in Adolescents: A Scoping Review.确定青少年痴呆相关态度的措施：一项范围综述
J Intergener Relatsh. 2024 Jul 2;22(3):461-481. doi: 10.1080/15350770.2023.2229837. Epub 2023 Jun 28.
4
Barriers and facilitators to social prescribing in child and youth mental health: perspectives from the frontline.促进儿童和青少年心理健康的社会处方实施的障碍和促进因素：来自一线的观点。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2024 May;33(5):1465-1479. doi: 10.1007/s00787-023-02257-x. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
5
Content Validity of a Scale Designed to Measure the Access of Older Adults to Outpatient Health Services.用于测量老年人获得门诊卫生服务机会的量表的内容效度。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 16;19(16):10102. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191610102.
6
Readability of Commonly Used Quality of Life Outcome Measures for Youth Self-Report.常用青少年自报告生活质量结局测量工具的可读性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 3;19(15):9555. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159555.
7
Children and young people's experiences of completing mental health and wellbeing measures for research: learning from two school-based pilot projects.儿童和年轻人参与为研究目的而完成心理健康与幸福度测评的经历：从两个学校试点项目中汲取经验
Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2020 Sep 16;14:35. doi: 10.1186/s13034-020-00341-7. eCollection 2020.
8
Psychometric properties of the self-report version of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire in the Ecuadorian context: an evaluation of four models.《自我报告版长处和困难问卷在厄瓜多尔背景下的心理测量特性：对四个模型的评估》
BMC Psychol. 2019 Aug 6;7(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s40359-019-0328-6.
本文引用的文献
1
Mental Health Difficulties in Early Adolescence: A Comparison of Two Cross-Sectional Studies in England From 2009 to 2014.青少年早期的心理健康问题：2009 年至 2014 年在英格兰进行的两项横断面研究的比较。
J Adolesc Health. 2015 May;56(5):502-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.01.023.
2
Measuring mental health and wellbeing outcomes for children and adolescents to inform practice and policy: a review of child self-report measures.测量儿童和青少年的心理健康与幸福状况以指导实践和政策制定：儿童自我报告测量方法综述
Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2014 Apr 29;8:14. doi: 10.1186/1753-2000-8-14. eCollection 2014.
3
The validation of the self-report strengths and difficulties questionnaire for use by 6- to 10-year-old children in the U.K.英国 6 至 10 岁儿童使用的自陈式长处和困难问卷的验证
Br J Clin Psychol. 2014 Mar;53(1):131-7. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12025. Epub 2013 Jun 27.
4
Further issues in determining the readability of self-report items: comment on McHugh and Behar (2009).进一步确定自陈式项目可读性的问题：对 McHugh 和 Behar（2009）的评论。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2012 Oct;80(5):952-5. doi: 10.1037/a0029928. Epub 2012 Aug 27.
5
Comprehension of self-report evidence-based measures of anxiety.焦虑的自我报告证据基础测量的理解。
Depress Anxiety. 2011 Jul;28(7):607-14. doi: 10.1002/da.20827. Epub 2011 May 26.
6
Readability of self-report measures of depression and anxiety.抑郁和焦虑自评量表的可读性。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2009 Dec;77(6):1100-12. doi: 10.1037/a0017124.
7
Mental health of children and adolescents with intellectual disabilities in Britain.英国智障儿童和青少年的心理健康状况。
Br J Psychiatry. 2007 Dec;191:493-9. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.107.038729.
8
The reading grade level of common measures in child and adolescent clinical psychology.儿童与青少年临床心理学常用测评工具的阅读年级水平
Psychol Assess. 2006 Sep;18(3):346-352. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.18.3.346.
9
The self-report version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: its psychometric properties in 8- to 13-year-old non-clinical children.优势与困难问卷的自我报告版本：其在8至13岁非临床儿童中的心理测量特性。
Br J Clin Psychol. 2004 Nov;43(Pt 4):437-48. doi: 10.1348/0144665042388982.
10
The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: a pilot study on the validity of the self-report version.长处与困难问卷：自我报告版本有效性的一项初步研究。
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2003 Feb-May;15(1-2):173-7. doi: 10.1080/0954026021000046137.
Zotero 插件