• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

接受拥抱与减轻人际冲突日出现的负面情绪有关。

Receiving a hug is associated with the attenuation of negative mood that occurs on days with interpersonal conflict.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.

School of Dental Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 Oct 3;13(10):e0203522. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203522. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0203522
PMID:30281606
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6169869/
Abstract

Interpersonal touch is emerging as an important topic in the study of adult relationships, with recent research showing that such behaviors can promote better relationship functioning and individual well-being. This investigation considers whether being hugged is associated with reduced conflict-related decreases in positive affect and increases in negative affect as well as whether these associations differ between women and men. A sample of 404 adults were interviewed every night for 14 consecutive days about their conflicts, hug receipt, and positive and negative affect. Results indicated that there was an interaction between hug receipt and conflict exposure such that receiving a hug was associated with a smaller conflict-related decrease in positive affect and a smaller conflict-related increase in negative affect when assessed concurrently. Hug receipt was also prospectively associated with a smaller conflict-related increase in next day negative affect but was not associated with next day positive affect. Associations between hug receipt and conflict-related changes in affect did not differ between women and men, between individuals who were married or in a marital-like relationship and those who were not, or as a function of individual differences in baseline perceived social support. While correlational, these results are consistent with the hypothesis that hugs buffer against deleterious changes in affect associated with experiencing interpersonal conflict. Possible mechanisms through which hugs facilitate positive adaptation to conflict are discussed.

摘要

人际接触正成为成人关系研究中的一个重要课题,最近的研究表明,这种行为可以促进更好的关系功能和个体幸福感。本研究考察了被拥抱是否与减少与冲突相关的积极情绪下降和增加消极情绪有关,以及这些关联是否因女性和男性而有所不同。一个由 404 名成年人组成的样本在连续 14 天的每天晚上接受关于他们的冲突、拥抱接受情况以及积极和消极情绪的访谈。结果表明,拥抱接受和冲突暴露之间存在交互作用,即当同时评估时,接受拥抱与积极情绪的冲突相关下降较小,与消极情绪的冲突相关增加较小有关。拥抱接受还与第二天的消极情绪的冲突相关增加呈前瞻性相关,但与第二天的积极情绪无关。拥抱接受与情绪相关的冲突变化之间的关联在女性和男性之间、已婚或类似婚姻关系的个体与未婚个体之间、以及个体基线感知社会支持的差异方面没有差异。虽然这些结果是相关的,但它们与拥抱缓冲与经历人际冲突相关的情绪恶化的假设一致。讨论了拥抱促进积极适应冲突的可能机制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0715/6169869/8c24674be28d/pone.0203522.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0715/6169869/3e299bf83895/pone.0203522.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0715/6169869/dec78d6b254a/pone.0203522.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0715/6169869/8c24674be28d/pone.0203522.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0715/6169869/3e299bf83895/pone.0203522.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0715/6169869/dec78d6b254a/pone.0203522.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0715/6169869/8c24674be28d/pone.0203522.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Receiving a hug is associated with the attenuation of negative mood that occurs on days with interpersonal conflict.接受拥抱与减轻人际冲突日出现的负面情绪有关。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 3;13(10):e0203522. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203522. eCollection 2018.
2
Social conflict, social support, and psychological distress: evidence of cross-domain buffering effects.社会冲突、社会支持与心理困扰:跨领域缓冲效应的证据
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1992 Nov;63(5):857-67. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.63.5.857.
3
Conflict and love: predicting newlywed marital outcomes from two interaction contexts.冲突与爱情:从两个互动情境预测新婚夫妇的婚姻结果。
J Fam Psychol. 2011 Aug;25(4):541-50. doi: 10.1037/a0024507.
4
Daily occupational stressors and marital behavior.日常职业压力源与婚姻行为。
J Fam Psychol. 2006 Dec;20(4):690-700. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.20.4.690.
5
Marital satisfaction and communication behaviors during sexual and nonsexual conflict discussions in newlywed couples: a pilot study.新婚夫妇在性冲突和非性冲突讨论中婚姻满意度和沟通行为:一项初步研究。
J Sex Marital Ther. 2011;37(2):94-103. doi: 10.1080/0092623X.2011.547352.
6
The influence of duration, arm crossing style, gender, and emotional closeness on hugging behaviour.拥抱行为的持续时间、手臂交叉方式、性别和情感亲密程度的影响。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2021 Nov;221:103441. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2021.103441. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
7
Hostile marital interactions, proinflammatory cytokine production, and wound healing.敌对的婚姻互动、促炎细胞因子的产生与伤口愈合。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005 Dec;62(12):1377-84. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.62.12.1377.
8
Prorelationship maintenance behaviors: the joint roles of attachment and commitment.促进关系维持的行为:依恋与承诺的共同作用
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 Oct;97(4):685-98. doi: 10.1037/a0016418.
9
Does hugging provide stress-buffering social support? A study of susceptibility to upper respiratory infection and illness.拥抱能提供缓解压力的社会支持吗?一项关于上呼吸道感染易感性和疾病的研究。
Psychol Sci. 2015 Feb;26(2):135-47. doi: 10.1177/0956797614559284. Epub 2014 Dec 19.
10
Emotions and family interactions in childhood: Associations with leukocyte telomere length emotions, family interactions, and telomere length.儿童期的情绪与家庭互动:与白细胞端粒长度、情绪、家庭互动及端粒长度的关联
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2016 Jan;63:343-50. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2015.10.018. Epub 2015 Oct 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Reliability and validity of a simplified touch experiences and attitudes questionnaire for Chinese college students.简化触摸体验和态度问卷在中国大学生中的信度和效度。
PLoS One. 2024 Jan 2;19(1):e0295812. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295812. eCollection 2024.
2
Responsive parental support buffers the link between chronic stress and cardiometabolic risk among adolescents.父母的及时支持可以缓冲慢性压力与青少年心血管代谢风险之间的关联。
Brain Behav Immun. 2024 Feb;116:114-123. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2023.11.027. Epub 2023 Dec 3.
3
Socioemotional self- and co-regulation in functional seizures: comparing high and low posttraumatic stress.

本文引用的文献

1
A Stage Model of Stress and Disease.压力与疾病的阶段模型。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2016 Jul;11(4):456-63. doi: 10.1177/1745691616646305.
2
Affectionate Touch to Promote Relational, Psychological, and Physical Well-Being in Adulthood: A Theoretical Model and Review of the Research.情感触摸促进成年人的关系、心理和身体健康:理论模型与研究综述。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2017 Aug;21(3):228-252. doi: 10.1177/1088868316650307. Epub 2016 May 24.
3
Does hugging provide stress-buffering social support? A study of susceptibility to upper respiratory infection and illness.
功能性癫痫中的社会情感自我调节与共同调节:创伤后应激水平高低的比较
Front Psychiatry. 2023 May 15;14:1135590. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1135590. eCollection 2023.
4
Hugs and Cortisol Awakening Response the Next Day: An Ecological Momentary Assessment Study.拥抱与次日皮质醇觉醒反应:一项生态瞬时评估研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 30;20(7):5340. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20075340.
5
Affective Experience and Regulation via Sleep, Touch, and "Sleep-Touch" Among Couples.夫妻间通过睡眠、触摸及“睡眠-触摸”产生的情感体验与调节
Affect Sci. 2022 Feb 3;3(2):353-369. doi: 10.1007/s42761-021-00093-3. eCollection 2022 Jun.
6
The Association of Embracing with Daily Mood and General Life Satisfaction: An Ecological Momentary Assessment Study.拥抱与日常情绪及总体生活满意度的关联:一项生态瞬时评估研究
J Nonverbal Behav. 2022;46(4):519-536. doi: 10.1007/s10919-022-00411-8. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
7
Social Factors Predict Distress Development in Adults With Pre-existing Mental Disorders During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic.社会因素预测2019冠状病毒病大流行期间已有精神障碍的成年人的痛苦发展情况。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 1;13:849650. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.849650. eCollection 2022.
8
A Practice-Inspired Mindset for Researching the Psychophysiological and Medical Health Effects of Recreational Dance (Dance Sport).一种受实践启发的心态,用于研究休闲舞蹈(体育舞蹈)对心理生理和医学健康的影响。
Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 25;11:588948. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.588948. eCollection 2020.
9
Compassion-focused imagery reduces shame and is moderated by shame, self-reassurance and multisensory imagery vividness.以同情为焦点的意象减少羞耻感,并受到羞耻感、自我安慰和多感官意象生动性的调节。
Res Psychother. 2019 Jan 17;22(1):329. doi: 10.4081/ripppo.2019.329. eCollection 2019 Apr 19.
10
What factors attract people to play romantic video games?哪些因素吸引人们玩浪漫视频游戏?
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 16;15(4):e0231535. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231535. eCollection 2020.
拥抱能提供缓解压力的社会支持吗?一项关于上呼吸道感染易感性和疾病的研究。
Psychol Sci. 2015 Feb;26(2):135-47. doi: 10.1177/0956797614559284. Epub 2014 Dec 19.
4
Negative social interactions and incident hypertension among older adults.老年人负面社会交往与高血压事件。
Health Psychol. 2014 Jun;33(6):554-65. doi: 10.1037/hea0000057.
5
Touch as an interpersonal emotion regulation process in couples' daily lives: the mediating role of psychological intimacy.触摸作为夫妻日常生活中的一种人际情绪调节过程:心理亲密感的中介作用。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2013 Oct;39(10):1373-85. doi: 10.1177/0146167213497592. Epub 2013 Jul 24.
6
Mechanisms linking social ties and support to physical and mental health.社会关系和支持与身心健康之间的联系机制。
J Health Soc Behav. 2011 Jun;52(2):145-61. doi: 10.1177/0022146510395592.
7
Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses.使用 G*Power 3.1 进行统计功效分析:相关和回归分析的检验。
Behav Res Methods. 2009 Nov;41(4):1149-60. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149.
8
Close relationships, inflammation, and health.亲密关系、炎症与健康。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2010 Sep;35(1):33-8. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.09.003. Epub 2009 Sep 12.
9
The paradox of received social support: the importance of responsiveness.所接受的社会支持的悖论:响应性的重要性。
Psychol Sci. 2009 Aug;20(8):928-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02388.x. Epub 2009 Jun 22.
10
The science of interpersonal touch: an overview.人际触摸的科学:概述。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2010 Feb;34(2):246-59. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.10.004. Epub 2008 Oct 17.