• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于从临床标本中检测单纯疱疹病毒的Ortho Cultureset(Vero细胞)和Difco Cellmatics系统(貂肺和原代兔肾细胞)的比较。

Comparison of the Ortho Cultureset (Vero cells) and Difco Cellmatics system (mink lung and primary rabbit kidney cells) for the detection of herpes simplex virus from clinical specimens.

作者信息

Beckwith D G, Halstead D C, Beckwith C H

出版信息

Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1987 Feb;6(2):145-9. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(87)90099-x.

DOI:10.1016/0732-8893(87)90099-x
PMID:3028705
Abstract

Two Cellmatics (Difco) Herpes simplex virus (HSV) detection systems, one with mink lung cells (ML) and the other with primary rabbit kidney cells (PRK) and the Cultureset (Ortho) system with Vero cells were compared for their ability to detect previously positive specimens. One hundred fifty patients specimens positive for HSV in either Vero or PRK cells prior to freezing at -70 degrees C were thawed once, diluted to 1:8, and inoculated in duplicate into each cell system. Positive cultures were detected using each kit's immunoperoxidase method. All three cell lines were stained at 24 hr followed by a final staining of negative cultures at 48 hr for Cultureset and at 72 hr for Cellmatics as per kit instructions. At 24 hr percent detection was: Cellmatics (ML) = 85%, Cellmatics (PRK) = 81%, Cultureset (Vero) = 74%. At final staining percent detection was 94%, 92%, and 84%, respectively. The Cellmatics system has the advantage of fewer steps in the staining procedure and no manipulation of coverslips because staining is performed in the tubes. As employed in these commercial systems, the Cellmatics system with ML cells is more sensitive than the Cultureset with Vero cells (p less than 0.001) and comparable to the Cellmatics system with PRK.

摘要

比较了两种Cellmatics(迪福公司)单纯疱疹病毒(HSV)检测系统,一种采用貂肺细胞(ML),另一种采用原代兔肾细胞(PRK),以及带有非洲绿猴肾细胞的Cultureset(奥索公司)系统检测先前阳性标本的能力。150份在-70℃冷冻前在非洲绿猴肾细胞或原代兔肾细胞中HSV呈阳性的患者标本解冻一次,稀释至1:8,并一式两份接种到每个细胞系统中。使用每个试剂盒的免疫过氧化物酶方法检测阳性培养物。按照试剂盒说明,所有三种细胞系在24小时时进行染色,Cultureset系统的阴性培养物在48小时时进行最终染色,Cellmatics系统的阴性培养物在72小时时进行最终染色。在24小时时的检测率为:Cellmatics(ML)=85%,Cellmatics(PRK)=81%,Cultureset(非洲绿猴肾细胞)=74%。在最终染色时的检测率分别为94%、92%和84%。Cellmatics系统的优点是染色过程步骤较少,且无需操作盖玻片,因为染色在试管中进行。在这些商业系统中,采用貂肺细胞的Cellmatics系统比采用非洲绿猴肾细胞的Cultureset系统更敏感(p<0.001),且与采用原代兔肾细胞的Cellmatics系统相当。

相似文献

1
Comparison of the Ortho Cultureset (Vero cells) and Difco Cellmatics system (mink lung and primary rabbit kidney cells) for the detection of herpes simplex virus from clinical specimens.用于从临床标本中检测单纯疱疹病毒的Ortho Cultureset(Vero细胞)和Difco Cellmatics系统(貂肺和原代兔肾细胞)的比较。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1987 Feb;6(2):145-9. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(87)90099-x.
2
Retrospective evaluation of the isolation and identification of herpes simplex virus with Cultureset and human fibroblasts.使用Cultureset和人成纤维细胞对单纯疱疹病毒进行分离和鉴定的回顾性评估。
J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Aug;22(2):255-8. doi: 10.1128/jcm.22.2.255-258.1985.
3
Viral isolation versus immune staining of infected cell cultures for the laboratory diagnosis of herpes simplex virus infections.用于单纯疱疹病毒感染实验室诊断的病毒分离与感染细胞培养物的免疫染色比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 1986 Sep;24(3):487-9. doi: 10.1128/jcm.24.3.487-489.1986.
4
More rapid isolation of herpes simplex virus in a continuous line of mink lung cells than in Vero or human fibroblast cells.在貂肺细胞连续系中单纯疱疹病毒的分离速度比在非洲绿猴肾细胞或人成纤维细胞中更快。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1984 Sep;2(4):317-24. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(84)90063-4.
5
Impact of cell culture sensitivity and virus concentration on rapid detection of herpes simplex virus by cytopathic effects and immunoperoxidase staining.细胞培养敏感性和病毒浓度对通过细胞病变效应和免疫过氧化物酶染色快速检测单纯疱疹病毒的影响。
J Clin Microbiol. 1987 Aug;25(8):1401-5. doi: 10.1128/jcm.25.8.1401-1405.1987.
6
Comparison of Cultureset and Bartels Immunodiagnostics with conventional tissue culture for isolation and identification of herpes simplex virus.将Cultureset和巴特尔免疫诊断法与传统组织培养法用于单纯疱疹病毒分离和鉴定的比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 1984 May;19(5):705-6. doi: 10.1128/jcm.19.5.705-706.1984.
7
[Comparative study of immunologic techniques applied to the detection of herpes simplex virus (HSV)].[应用于检测单纯疱疹病毒(HSV)的免疫技术的比较研究]
Arch Inst Pasteur Alger. 1989;57:25-38.
8
Comparison of primary rabbit kidney and MRC-5 cells and two stain procedures for herpes simplex virus detection by a shell vial centrifugation method.采用空斑小瓶离心法检测单纯疱疹病毒时,原代兔肾细胞和MRC-5细胞的比较及两种染色程序
J Clin Microbiol. 1988 Feb;26(2):222-4. doi: 10.1128/jcm.26.2.222-224.1988.
9
Comparison of Chemicon SimulFluor direct fluorescent antibody staining with cell culture and shell vial direct immunoperoxidase staining for detection of herpes simplex virus and with cytospin direct immunofluorescence staining for detection of varicella-zoster virus.将Chemicon SimulFluor直接荧光抗体染色法与用于检测单纯疱疹病毒的细胞培养和空斑小瓶直接免疫过氧化物酶染色法以及用于检测水痘-带状疱疹病毒的细胞离心涂片直接免疫荧光染色法进行比较。
Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2001 Sep;8(5):909-12. doi: 10.1128/CDLI.8.5.909-912.2001.
10
Detection of herpes simplex virus by biotinylated DNA probes.用生物素化DNA探针检测单纯疱疹病毒
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1988 Nov;11(3):145-9. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(88)90016-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of diploid fibroblast and rabbit kidney tissue cultures and a diploid fibroblast microtiter plate system for the isolation of herpes simplex virus.用于分离单纯疱疹病毒的二倍体成纤维细胞和兔肾组织培养物以及二倍体成纤维细胞微量滴定板系统的比较
J Clin Microbiol. 1988 Sep;26(9):1772-4. doi: 10.1128/jcm.26.9.1772-1774.1988.
2
The impact of cell culture sensitivity on rapid viral diagnosis: a historical perspective.细胞培养敏感性对快速病毒诊断的影响:历史视角
Yale J Biol Med. 1989 Mar-Apr;62(2):79-88.
3
Rapid isolation of herpes simplex virus by using mink lung and rhabdomyosarcoma cell cultures.
利用貂肺和横纹肌肉瘤细胞培养快速分离单纯疱疹病毒。
J Clin Microbiol. 1990 Dec;28(12):2806-7. doi: 10.1128/jcm.28.12.2806-2807.1990.