Lafferty W E, Krofft S, Remington M, Giddings R, Winter C, Cent A, Corey L
J Clin Microbiol. 1987 Feb;25(2):323-6. doi: 10.1128/jcm.25.2.323-326.1987.
One hundred thirty specimens from 108 consecutive patients with a history of recurrent genital ulcerations were used in a study comparing herpes simplex virus (HSV) isolation with a direct fluorescent-antibody (DFA) technique using mouse monoclonal antibodies. HSV was isolated from 70% of vesicular lesions, 67% of pustular lesions, 32% of ulcerative lesions, and 17% of crusted lesions, whereas the DFA technique detected HSV antigen in 87, 67, 30, and 10% of lesions in similar stages, respectively. When both methods were used, HSV was identified in 97, 79, 45, and 17% of vesicles, pustules, ulcers, and crusted lesions, respectively. The overall sensitivity and specificity of the DFA technique in comparison with virus isolation (VI) were 74 and 85%, respectively. Of the 17 patients from whom DFA-positive, VI-negative samples were obtained, HSV was subsequently isolated from a genital lesion in 14, suggesting that they were not DFA false-positives. Similarly, of the 46 patients whose initial lesion samples were DFA and VI negative, 37 (80%) had HSV identified from subsequent genital lesions during follow-up. Thus, a single sample for VI or DFA testing from a recurrent genital lesion had a sensitivity of only 53 and 51%, respectively. Combining the DFA technique and VI increased the sensitivity of laboratory diagnosis of a single recurrent episode of genital HSV; however, repetitive laboratory testing was often required to confirm the diagnosis of recurrent genital HSV infection.
在一项研究中,使用了来自108例连续复发性生殖器溃疡病史患者的130份标本,比较单纯疱疹病毒(HSV)分离法与使用小鼠单克隆抗体的直接荧光抗体(DFA)技术。HSV从70%的水疱性损害、67%的脓疱性损害、32%的溃疡性损害和17%的结痂性损害中分离出来,而DFA技术在相似阶段分别在87%、67%、30%和10%的损害中检测到HSV抗原。当两种方法都使用时,分别在97%、79%、45%和17%的水疱、脓疱、溃疡和结痂性损害中鉴定出HSV。与病毒分离(VI)相比,DFA技术的总体敏感性和特异性分别为74%和85%。在获得DFA阳性、VI阴性样本的17例患者中,随后在14例患者的生殖器损害中分离出HSV,表明这些不是DFA假阳性。同样,在46例初始损害样本DFA和VI均为阴性的患者中,37例(80%)在随访期间从随后的生殖器损害中鉴定出HSV。因此,从复发性生殖器损害中获取的用于VI或DFA检测的单个样本敏感性分别仅为53%和51%。将DFA技术和VI结合可提高生殖器HSV单次复发发作实验室诊断的敏感性;然而,通常需要重复实验室检测以确诊复发性生殖器HSV感染。