Shepon Alon, Henriksson Patrik John Gustav, Wu Tong
Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.
Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Front Nutr. 2018 Nov 5;5:104. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2018.00104. eCollection 2018.
The industrialized world has entered a new era of widespread automation, and although this may create long-term gains in economic productivity and wealth accumulation, many professions are expected to disappear during the ensuing shift, leading to potentially significant disruptions in labor markets and associated socioeconomic difficulties. Food production, like many other industrial sectors, has also undergone a century of mechanization, having moved toward increasingly large-scale monoculture production-especially in developed economies-with higher yields but detrimental environmental impacts on a global scale. Certain characteristics of the food sector and its products cast doubts on whether future automation will influence it in the same ways as in other sectors. We conceptualize a model of future food production within the socioeconomic conditions created by widespread automation. We ideate that despite immediate shocks to the economy, in the long run higher productivity can free up human activity to be channeled toward more interactive, skill-intensive food production systems, where communal efforts can reduce industrial reliance, diversify farming, and reconnect people to the biosphere-a realization of human well-being that resembles the classical philosophical ideal of Eudaimonia. We explore food production concepts, such as communal gardens and polyculture, and the economic conditions and institutions needed to underwrite them [e.g., a universal basic income (UBI)]. However, arguments can be raised as to why social-ecological systems would benefit from more labor-intensive food production. In this paper we: (1) discuss the current state of the food system and the need to reform it in light of its environmental and social impacts; (2) present automation as a lever that could move society toward more sustainable food production; (3) highlight the beneficial attributes of a Eudaimonian model; and (4) discuss the potential challenges to its implementation. Our purpose is to highlight a possible outcome that future research will need to refine and expand based on evidence and successful case studies. The ultimate aim is to promote a food system that can provide food security while staying within the safe operating space of planetary boundaries, produce more nutritious diets, enhance social capital, and reconnect communities with the biosphere.
工业化世界已进入广泛自动化的新时代,尽管这可能会在经济生产力和财富积累方面带来长期收益,但在随之而来的转变过程中,许多职业预计将会消失,从而可能给劳动力市场带来重大冲击以及相关的社会经济困难。与许多其他工业部门一样,食品生产也经历了一个世纪的机械化进程,已朝着规模越来越大的单一作物种植生产发展——尤其是在发达经济体中——产量更高,但在全球范围内对环境产生了不利影响。食品部门及其产品的某些特性让人怀疑未来的自动化是否会以与其他部门相同的方式影响它。我们在广泛自动化所创造的社会经济条件下构思了一个未来食品生产的模型。我们设想,尽管会对经济造成直接冲击,但从长远来看,更高的生产力可以将人类活动解放出来,引导至更具互动性、技能密集型的食品生产系统,在这种系统中,集体努力可以减少对工业的依赖,使农业多样化,并让人们与生物圈重新建立联系——这是一种类似于古典哲学中幸福主义理想的人类福祉的实现。我们探讨了诸如社区花园和多元种植等食品生产概念,以及支持它们所需的经济条件和制度[例如普遍基本收入(UBI)]。然而,对于为什么社会生态系统会从劳动密集型程度更高的食品生产中受益,可能会有人提出不同观点。在本文中,我们:(1)讨论食品系统的现状以及鉴于其对环境和社会的影响而进行改革的必要性;(2)将自动化视为推动社会走向更可持续食品生产的一个杠杆;(3)强调幸福主义模型的有益属性;(4)讨论其实施过程中可能面临的挑战。我们的目的是突出一种未来研究需要根据证据和成功案例进行完善和扩展的可能结果。最终目标是推动建立一个既能提供粮食安全,又能保持在地球边界安全运行范围内,生产更有营养的饮食,增强社会资本,并使社区与生物圈重新建立联系的食品系统。