• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国传统文化和现代文化会影响年轻人的道德优先级吗?

Do Chinese Traditional and Modern Cultures Affect Young Adults' Moral Priorities?

作者信息

Hu Xiaomeng, Chen Sylvia Xiaohua, Zhang Li, Yu Feng, Peng Kaiping, Liu Li

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.

Department of Applied Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Hong Kong.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2018 Nov 6;9:1799. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01799. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01799
PMID:30459663
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6232185/
Abstract

Dramatic cultural change has occurred in Mainland China over the past four decades, yet little is known about how this cultural shift impacts Chinese peoples' moral values. The present research aims to fill this gap by examining whether Chinese traditional and modern cultures influence young adults' moral judgments. Study 1 investigated the relation between psychological traditionality/modernity and moral concerns. Results indicated that participants who strongly endorsed Chinese traditional culture prioritize relationship concern rather than justice concern. Study 2 used the cultural priming method and tested the effects of traditional and modern icons on moral concerns. Results suggested that participants who were primed with traditional or modern or neutral icons did not give priority to relationship or justice concern. Together, our findings provide initial empirical evidence on whether Chinese traditional and modern cultures shift the moral mindsets of bicultural young Chinese among alternative (and even competing) moral codes.

摘要

在过去的四十年里,中国大陆发生了巨大的文化变革,但对于这种文化转变如何影响中国人的道德价值观,我们却知之甚少。本研究旨在通过考察中国传统文化和现代文化是否影响年轻人的道德判断来填补这一空白。研究1调查了心理传统性/现代性与道德关注之间的关系。结果表明,强烈认同中国传统文化的参与者更注重关系关注而非正义关注。研究2采用文化启动法,测试传统和现代标志对道德关注的影响。结果表明,被传统、现代或中性标志启动的参与者并没有优先考虑关系或正义关注。总之,我们的研究结果为中国传统文化和现代文化是否会在多元(甚至相互竞争)的道德准则中改变双文化中国年轻人的道德思维模式提供了初步的实证证据。

相似文献

1
Do Chinese Traditional and Modern Cultures Affect Young Adults' Moral Priorities?中国传统文化和现代文化会影响年轻人的道德优先级吗?
Front Psychol. 2018 Nov 6;9:1799. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01799. eCollection 2018.
2
The Influence of Self-Relevance and Cultural Values on Moral Orientation.自我相关性和文化价值观对道德取向的影响。
Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 28;10:292. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00292. eCollection 2019.
3
The impact of traditionality/modernity on identification- and calculus-based trust.传统性/现代性对基于认同和算计的信任的影响。
Int J Psychol. 2019 Apr;54(2):237-246. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12445. Epub 2017 Jul 30.
4
Medical professionalism in China and the United States: a transcultural interpretation.中国与美国的医学职业精神:一种跨文化解读
J Clin Ethics. 2015 Spring;26(1):48-60.
5
A martyr for modernity: Qiu Jin -- feminist warrior, and revolutionary.一位现代性的殉道者:秋瑾——女权斗士与革命者。
Int J Hist Sport. 2001;18(1):27-54. doi: 10.1080/714001489.
6
Latent Fairness in Adults' Relationship-Based Moral Judgments.成年人基于关系的道德判断中的潜在公平性。
Front Psychol. 2015 Dec 10;6:1871. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01871. eCollection 2015.
7
Dynamic self-representation of interdependent Chinese: The effect of bicultural experience.相互依存的中国人的动态自我表征:双文化经历的影响。
Int J Psychol. 2018 Aug;53(4):278-286. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12370. Epub 2016 Aug 9.
8
Dynamic influences of culture on cooperation in the prisoner's dilemma.文化对囚徒困境中合作的动态影响。
Psychol Sci. 2005 Jun;16(6):429-34. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01552.x.
9
Chinese culture and fertility decline.中国文化与生育率下降。
Chin J Popul Sci. 1992;4(2):95-103.
10
[Female patients with eating disorders and their parents experience in China: A qualitative study].[中国饮食失调女性患者及其父母的经历:一项定性研究]
Encephale. 2022 Feb;48(1):43-51. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2021.01.006. Epub 2021 Apr 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychometrics evaluation of the Chinese version of the revised Rushton Moral Resilience Scale in registered nurses.注册护士中修订版拉什顿道德复原力量表中文版的心理测量学评估
BMC Nurs. 2025 Aug 27;24(1):1123. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03783-6.
2
Adaptation of the virtual assessment of mentalizing ability and evaluation of its utility and psychometric properties in Chinese individuals on the schizophrenia spectrum.精神化能力的虚拟评估在中国精神分裂症谱系个体中的适应性及其效用和心理测量特性评估
Schizophrenia (Heidelb). 2025 Mar 17;11(1):43. doi: 10.1038/s41537-025-00594-1.
3
Psychological Traditionality and Modernity and Happiness: The Different Happiness Levels in Chinese Students.心理传统性与现代性和幸福感:中国学生的不同幸福水平
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Apr 8;14(4):304. doi: 10.3390/bs14040304.
4
Culture and self-construal in the age of globalization: an empirical inquiry based on multiple approaches.全球化时代的文化与自我建构:基于多种方法的实证探究
Front Psychol. 2024 Mar 19;15:1353898. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1353898. eCollection 2024.
5
The Influence of Traditional Culture Integration into Chinese Language and Literature Teaching on the Improvement of Mental Health of College Students.传统文化融入汉语言文学教学对提升大学生心理健康水平的影响。
J Environ Public Health. 2022 Sep 15;2022:9528503. doi: 10.1155/2022/9528503. eCollection 2022.
6
Exploring the mechanism of consumer purchase intention in a traditional culture based on the theory of planned behavior.基于计划行为理论探究传统文化背景下消费者购买意愿的形成机制。
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 13;14:1110191. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1110191. eCollection 2023.
7
Thematic Analysis of My "Coming Out" Experiences Through an Intersectional Lens: An Autoethnographic Study.通过交叉视角对我的“出柜”经历进行主题分析:一项自我民族志研究。
Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 23;12:654946. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.654946. eCollection 2021.
8
Associations of Substance Use Behaviors With Suicidal Ideation and Suicide Attempts Among US and Chinese Adolescents.美国和中国青少年物质使用行为与自杀意念及自杀未遂的关联。
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Jan 18;11:611579. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.611579. eCollection 2020.
9
Trajectory of smoking behavior change among Chinese immigrant smokers.中国移民吸烟者吸烟行为变化轨迹。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 2;16(2):e0246280. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246280. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Social change, cultural evolution, and human development.社会变革、文化演变与人类发展。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2016 Apr;8:84-92. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.10.012. Epub 2015 Oct 22.
2
Cultural differences in moral judgment and behavior, across and within societies.不同社会之间及社会内部道德判断与行为的文化差异。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2016 Apr;8:125-130. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.09.007. Epub 2015 Sep 21.
3
Conceptualizing psychological processes in response to globalization: Components, antecedents, and consequences of global orientations.全球化背景下心理过程的概念化:全球取向的组成部分、前因及后果
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2016 Feb;110(2):302-331. doi: 10.1037/a0039647. Epub 2015 Aug 24.
4
Large-scale psychological differences within China explained by rice versus wheat agriculture.中国内部存在大规模的心理差异,可以用水稻和小麦农业来解释。
Science. 2014 May 9;344(6184):603-8. doi: 10.1126/science.1246850.
5
Are cultures becoming individualistic? A cross-temporal comparison of individualism-collectivism in the United States and Japan.文化是否变得越来越个人主义?对美国和日本个人主义-集体主义的跨时间比较。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2012 Feb;16(1):3-24. doi: 10.1177/1088868311411587. Epub 2011 Jun 23.
6
The weirdest people in the world?世界上最奇怪的人?
Behav Brain Sci. 2010 Jun;33(2-3):61-83; discussion 83-135. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X0999152X. Epub 2010 Jun 15.
7
Linking social change and developmental change: shifting pathways of human development.连接社会变革与发展变革:人类发展途径的转变
Dev Psychol. 2009 Mar;45(2):401-18. doi: 10.1037/a0014726.
8
The new synthesis in moral psychology.道德心理学的新综合。
Science. 2007 May 18;316(5827):998-1002. doi: 10.1126/science.1137651.
9
What's wrong with cross-cultural comparisons of subjective Likert scales?: The reference-group effect.主观李克特量表的跨文化比较存在什么问题?:参照群体效应。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002 Jun;82(6):903-18.
10
Rethinking individualism and collectivism: evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses.重新思考个人主义与集体主义:理论假设与元分析评估
Psychol Bull. 2002 Jan;128(1):3-72.