The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
BMC Nephrol. 2018 Nov 27;19(1):339. doi: 10.1186/s12882-018-1131-y.
To date, limited research has been dedicated to exploring the experience of decision-making for chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients who have initiated dialysis and have to make decisions in the context of managing multiple illnesses. Evidence about the experience of decision-making for minority or disadvantaged groups living with CKD (e.g. culturally and linguistically diverse adults; those with lower health literacy or cognitive impairment) is also lacking. This study aimed to explore the experience of healthcare decision-making among culturally and linguistically diverse adults receiving in-centre haemodialysis for advanced CKD.
Semi-structured interviews with English or Arabic-speaking adults recruited from four large haemodialysis units in Greater Western Sydney, Australia using stratified, purposive sampling. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed using the Framework method.
Interviews were conducted with 35 participants from a range of cultural backgrounds (26 English-language; 9 Arabic-language). One quarter had limited health literacy as assessed by the Single Item Literacy Screener. Four major themes were identified from the data, highlighting that participants had limited awareness of decision-points throughout the CKD trajectory (other than the decision to initiate dialysis), expressed passivity regarding their involvement in healthcare decisions, and reported inconsistent information provision within and across dialysis units. There was diversity within cultural and linguistic groups in terms of preferences and beliefs regarding religiosity, decision-making and internalised prototypical cultural values.
Without sustained effort, adults living with CKD may be uninformed about decision points throughout the CKD trajectory and/or unengaged in the process of making decisions. While culture may be an important component of people's lives, cultural assumptions may oversimplify the diverse individual differences that exist within cultural groups.
迄今为止,针对已开始透析并必须在多种疾病管理背景下做出决策的慢性肾脏病 (CKD) 患者的决策体验,相关研究有限。关于少数族裔或弱势群体(例如文化和语言多样化的成年人、健康素养或认知能力较低的成年人)的决策体验的证据也很缺乏。本研究旨在探讨在澳大利亚大西部悉尼的四个大型血液透析中心接受中心血液透析治疗的文化和语言多样化的成年人在医疗保健决策方面的体验。
采用分层、有针对性的抽样方法,从澳大利亚大西部悉尼的四个大型血液透析中心招募英语或阿拉伯语成年人进行半结构化访谈。访谈以录音形式进行,逐字转录,并使用框架方法进行分析。
从不同文化背景(26 名英语;9 名阿拉伯语)的参与者中进行了访谈。四分之一的人根据单一项目文化程度筛查器评估结果显示健康素养有限。数据中确定了四个主要主题,突出表明参与者对 CKD 病程中的决策点(除了启动透析的决策外)缺乏认识,对参与医疗保健决策持被动态度,并且报告了透析单位内部和之间信息提供不一致。在宗教信仰、决策和内在典型文化价值观方面,文化和语言群体之间在偏好和信念方面存在多样性。
如果不付出持续努力,患有 CKD 的成年人可能对 CKD 病程中的决策点一无所知,或者对决策过程不参与。虽然文化可能是人们生活的重要组成部分,但文化假设可能过于简化了文化群体内部存在的多样化个体差异。