• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

莱顿抑郁敏感性指数修订版(LEIDS-R):西班牙语验证提案。

Leiden Index of Depression Sensitivity-Revised (LEIDS-R): Spanish validation proposal.

作者信息

Senín-Calderón Cristina, Perona-Garcelán Salvador, Ruíz-Veguilla Miguel, Rodríguez-Testal Juan F

机构信息

Universidad de Cádiz, Spain.

Universidad de Sevilla, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2017 May-Aug;17(2):139-150. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2017.02.001. Epub 2017 Mar 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijchp.2017.02.001
PMID:30487889
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6220899/
Abstract

To adapt and validate the Leiden Index of Depression Sensitivity-Revised for evaluating cognitive reactivity to depressive mood to Spanish and validate this Spanish version. To find the scale's factor structure and psychometric properties. The sample consisted of 600 participants (103 patients and 497 subjects from the general population). A four-factor structure was found, a general factor evaluating cognitive reactivity was proposed and ten items were eliminated. A brief version of the (LEIDS-R24) scale is proposed. The factors and the overall scale have adequate internal consistency, and the results of validation show that all the factors on the scale predict depressive symptomatology (BDI-II) adequately, and are highly correlated with the Dysfunctional Attitudes Scale and BDI-II scales. The complete scale adequately discriminated depressive symptomatology in general population subjects and patients with anxiety and depressive disorders. No significant differences were found in the LEIDS-R24 measurement between subjects with anxiety and depressive disorder. The LEIDS-R24 scale may be a useful brief measure for evaluating cognitive reactivity to depressive mood and analyzing the vulnerability which could be common to persons with anxiety and depressive disorders.

摘要

对用于评估对抑郁情绪的认知反应性的《莱顿抑郁敏感性指数修订版》进行改编并验证其西班牙语版本,并对该西班牙语版本进行验证。找出该量表的因子结构和心理测量特性。样本包括600名参与者(103名患者和497名普通人群受试者)。发现了一个四因子结构,提出了一个评估认知反应性的一般因子,并删除了10个项目。提出了(LEIDS-R24)量表的简短版本。各因子和总量表具有足够的内部一致性,验证结果表明量表上的所有因子都能充分预测抑郁症状(BDI-II),并且与功能失调性态度量表和BDI-II量表高度相关。完整量表能充分区分普通人群受试者以及焦虑和抑郁障碍患者的抑郁症状。在焦虑和抑郁障碍患者之间,LEIDS-R24测量结果无显著差异。LEIDS-R24量表可能是一种有用的简短测量工具,用于评估对抑郁情绪的认知反应性,并分析焦虑和抑郁障碍患者可能共有的易感性。

相似文献

1
Leiden Index of Depression Sensitivity-Revised (LEIDS-R): Spanish validation proposal.莱顿抑郁敏感性指数修订版(LEIDS-R):西班牙语验证提案。
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2017 May-Aug;17(2):139-150. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2017.02.001. Epub 2017 Mar 19.
2
The measurement of cognitive reactivity to sad mood in patients remitted from major depressive disorder.对重性抑郁障碍缓解患者悲伤情绪的认知反应的测量。
Br J Clin Psychol. 2018 Sep;57(3):313-327. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12175. Epub 2018 Feb 27.
3
Cognitive Reactivity: Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Testing of the Persian Version of the Leiden Index of Depression Sensitivity Revised (LEIDS-R) in an Iranian Sample.认知反应性:伊朗样本中《莱顿抑郁敏感性修订指数》(LEIDS-R)波斯文版的文化适应与心理测量测试
Int J Ment Health Addict. 2017;15(3):621-638. doi: 10.1007/s11469-016-9713-z. Epub 2016 Nov 14.
4
Psychometric properties of the Leiden Index of Depression Sensitivity (LEIDS).莱顿抑郁敏感性指数(LEIDS)的心理测量特性。
Psychol Assess. 2017 Feb;29(2):158-171. doi: 10.1037/pas0000326. Epub 2016 May 5.
5
An investigation of the relationship between cognitive reactivity and rumination.认知反应性与沉思之间关系的调查。
Behav Ther. 2008 Mar;39(1):65-71. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2007.05.001. Epub 2007 Oct 26.
6
Adaptation and validation of the Chinese version of the modified Leiden index of depression sensitivity.改良莱顿抑郁敏感指数中文版的调适与验证。
J Affect Disord. 2019 Sep 1;256:458-467. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.06.022. Epub 2019 Jun 22.
7
[The specificity of cognitive reactivity in recurrent major depressive episodes].[复发性重度抑郁发作中认知反应性的特异性]
Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 2014 Apr;85(1):29-39. doi: 10.4992/jjpsy.85.29.
8
Cognitive reactivity to sad mood: structure and validity of a new measure.对悲伤情绪的认知反应性:一种新测量方法的结构与效度
Behav Res Ther. 2002 Jan;40(1):105-20. doi: 10.1016/s0005-7967(00)00111-x.
9
Cognitive reactivity versus dysfunctional cognitions and the prediction of relapse in recurrent major depressive disorder.复发性重度抑郁症中的认知反应性与功能失调性认知及复发预测
J Clin Psychiatry. 2015 Oct;76(10):e1306-12. doi: 10.4088/JCP.14m09268.
10
Supporting routine cognitive reactivity assessment during the perinatal period: psychometric testing of the Chinese version of the Leiden Index of Depression Sensitivity.支持围产期常规认知反应评估:莱顿抑郁敏感性指数中文版的心理测量学测试。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Dec 6;22(1):911. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-05233-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Multi-species probiotic supplement enhances vagal nerve function - results of a randomized controlled trial in patients with depression and healthy controls.多物种益生菌补充剂可增强迷走神经功能——一项针对抑郁症患者和健康对照者的随机对照试验结果
Gut Microbes. 2025 Dec;17(1):2492377. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2025.2492377. Epub 2025 Apr 29.
2
Supporting routine cognitive reactivity assessment during the perinatal period: psychometric testing of the Chinese version of the Leiden Index of Depression Sensitivity.支持围产期常规认知反应评估:莱顿抑郁敏感性指数中文版的心理测量学测试。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Dec 6;22(1):911. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-05233-6.
3
Sex difference in the weighting of expected uncertainty under chronic stress.慢性应激下预期不确定性的权重存在性别差异。
Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 22;11(1):8700. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-88155-1.
4
Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the End-of-Life Decision-Making and Staff Stress Questionnaire.中文版《临终决策与员工压力问卷》的心理测量学特性
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2020 Sep-Dec;20(3):271-281. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2020.07.001. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
5
Factors influencing cognitive reactivity among young adults at high risk for depression in China: a cross-sectional study.中国抑郁高风险青年认知反应性的影响因素:一项横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2020 May 15;20(1):703. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08845-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Predictors of depression severity in a treatment-seeking sample.寻求治疗样本中抑郁严重程度的预测因素。
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2016 Sep-Dec;16(3):221-229. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2016.02.001. Epub 2016 Mar 27.
2
Predictors of dropout in a controlled clinical trial of psychotherapy for moderate depression.中度抑郁症心理治疗对照临床试验中退出治疗的预测因素
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2015 Jan-Apr;15(1):76-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2014.11.001. Epub 2014 Nov 28.
3
Psychometric properties of the Leiden Index of Depression Sensitivity (LEIDS).莱顿抑郁敏感性指数(LEIDS)的心理测量特性。
Psychol Assess. 2017 Feb;29(2):158-171. doi: 10.1037/pas0000326. Epub 2016 May 5.
4
Cognitive reactivity versus dysfunctional cognitions and the prediction of relapse in recurrent major depressive disorder.复发性重度抑郁症中的认知反应性与功能失调性认知及复发预测
J Clin Psychiatry. 2015 Oct;76(10):e1306-12. doi: 10.4088/JCP.14m09268.
5
Cognitive reactivity, self-depressed associations, and the recurrence of depression.认知反应性、自我抑郁联想与抑郁复发。
J Affect Disord. 2015 Sep 1;183:300-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.05.018. Epub 2015 May 18.
6
A preliminary investigation of the long-term outcome of the Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders.情绪障碍跨诊断治疗统一方案的长期疗效初步调查。
Compr Psychiatry. 2014 Nov;55(8):1920-7. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2014.07.016. Epub 2014 Jul 22.
7
Cognitive reactivity, implicit associations, and the incidence of depression: a two-year prospective study.认知反应性、内隐联想测验与抑郁的发生:一项为期两年的前瞻性研究。
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 26;8(7):e70245. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070245. Print 2013.
8
Cognitive vulnerability differentially predicts symptom dimensions of depression.认知脆弱性可预测抑郁症状的不同维度。
J Affect Disord. 2013 Oct;151(1):92-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2013.05.057. Epub 2013 Jun 17.
9
[International Test Commission Guidelines for test translation and adaptation: second edition].[国际测试委员会测试翻译与改编指南:第二版]
Psicothema. 2013;25(2):151-7. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2013.24.
10
Mood reactivity rather than cognitive reactivity is predictive of depressive relapse: a randomized study with 5.5-year follow-up.心境反应而非认知反应可预测抑郁复发:一项随访 5.5 年的随机研究。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2013 Jun;81(3):508-17. doi: 10.1037/a0032223. Epub 2013 Mar 11.