Department of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness, and Safety (IQuESt), Michael E DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, Texas.
Telemed J E Health. 2020 Feb;26(2):244-250. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2018.0313. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
Community health workers (CHWs) are a well-established source to improve patient health care, yet their training and support remain suboptimal. This limits program expansion and potentially compromises patient safety. The objective of the study was to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of weekly training and support by telemedicine (videoconferencing). CHWs (n = 6) who led diabetes group visits for low-income Latinos met weekly with a health care professional for training and support. Feasibility and acceptability outcome measures included telemedicine usability, knowledge of diabetes (baseline to 6 months), and program satisfaction. Telemedicine training and support were found to be feasible and acceptable as measured by usability (Telehealth Usability Questionnaire: average 4.7/5.0, ±0.4), knowledge (Diabetes Knowledge Test: pretest 15.8 ± 1.3, posttest 21.8 ± 1.2, p < 0.001, respectively), and satisfaction (Texas Department of State Health Services survey: average 5.8/6.0, ±0.5). All CHWs preferred telemedicine to in-person training. Telemedicine is a feasible and acceptable modality to train and support CHWs.
社区卫生工作者(CHWs)是改善患者医疗保健的成熟资源,但他们的培训和支持仍不尽人意。这限制了项目的扩展,并可能危及患者安全。本研究的目的是评估通过远程医疗(视频会议)进行每周培训和支持的可行性和可接受性。为低收入拉丁裔人群提供糖尿病小组访视的 CHWs(n=6)每周与医疗保健专业人员进行一次培训和支持。可行性和可接受性的衡量标准包括远程医疗的可用性、糖尿病知识(基线至 6 个月)和计划满意度。远程医疗培训和支持的可用性(远程医疗可用性问卷:平均 4.7/5.0,±0.4)、知识(糖尿病知识测试:预测试 15.8±1.3,后测试 21.8±1.2,p<0.001)和满意度(德克萨斯州卫生部调查:平均 5.8/6.0,±0.5)均表明是可行和可接受的。所有 CHWs 都更喜欢远程医疗培训而非面对面培训。远程医疗是培训和支持 CHWs 的一种可行且可接受的模式。