Department of Medicine, Hennepin Healthcare, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Department of Design, Housing, and Apparel, College of Design, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Clin Transplant. 2019 May;33(5):e13530. doi: 10.1111/ctr.13530. Epub 2019 Apr 1.
Kidney transplant candidates face complex decisions about transplant options such as living donation or acceptance of lower quality kidneys. We sought to characterize knowledge and decision support needs regarding kidney transplant outcomes and options.
We conducted 10 interviews and four focus groups of 28 adult kidney transplant candidates from two centers in Minnesota. Transcripts were analyzed thematically using a grounded theory approach.
We identified four themes: First, candidates have a limited understanding of treatment options and demonstrate confusion or a lack of awareness about waiting list outcomes and prognosis. Second, candidates desired frank discussions about likely outcomes and individualized prognosis. Third, emotional barriers impact how patients make informed decisions. Finally, participants relied on the support of family and friends to help process information, and many favored the medical community engaging their family and friends in their medical decisions. These findings were incorporated into a conceptual model to support kidney transplant candidates in medical decision making.
Transplant candidates had limited understanding about treatment options and outcomes on the kidney transplant waiting list. Individualized risk information and cognitive approaches that recognize how patients process information and balance competing risks may improve informed decision making.
肾脏移植候选人面临着关于移植选择的复杂决策,例如活体捐赠或接受质量较低的肾脏。我们旨在描述有关肾脏移植结果和选择的知识和决策支持需求。
我们在明尼苏达州的两个中心进行了 10 次访谈和 4 次 28 名成人肾脏移植候选人的焦点小组。使用扎根理论方法对转录本进行主题分析。
我们确定了四个主题:首先,候选人对治疗选择的理解有限,并且对候补名单结果和预后感到困惑或缺乏认识。其次,候选人希望坦诚讨论可能的结果和个性化的预后。第三,情感障碍会影响患者做出明智决策的能力。最后,参与者依靠家人和朋友的支持来帮助处理信息,许多人赞成医疗社区让他们的家人和朋友参与他们的医疗决策。这些发现被纳入一个概念模型,以支持肾脏移植候选人进行医疗决策。
移植候选人对候补名单上的治疗选择和结果的了解有限。个性化的风险信息和认知方法,这些方法可以识别患者如何处理信息并平衡竞争风险,可能会改善知情决策。