Federal Institute of Piauí, Campus Pedro II, Piauí 64255-000, Brazil.
Department of Nutrition, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Brasilia, Brasilia 70910-900, Brazil.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Mar 20;16(6):1005. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16061005.
This study aimed to develop and validate an instrument to evaluate Brazilian home kitchens' good practices. We elaborated on the preliminary version of the check-list based on the Brazilian resolution for food safety Collegiate Board Resolution 216 (RDC 216), Collegiate Board Resolution 275 (RDC 275), the standard 22000 from the International Organization for Standardization (ISO 22000) and Codex Alimentarius. Seven experts with experience in the area participated in the check-list validation and semantic evaluation. The criteria used for the approval of the items, as to their importance for the prevention of food contamination and clarity of the wording, was the achievement of a minimum of five out of seven of agreement among the experts (-values ≥ 0.7). Moreover, items should have a mean ≥3 for the evaluation of importance (content validation) and clarity (semantic evaluation) to be maintained in the instrument. After the expert phase, we conducted another semantic evaluation of the check-list with a focus group composed of 13 undergraduate students, one moderator, and one observer of the process, to evaluate each item regarding its clarity, considering their level of understanding of the item. The final version of the check-list was composed of 77 items, divided into four blocks. The check-list developed was validated with respect to content with a W-value of 0.86 and approved in the semantic evaluation.
本研究旨在开发和验证一种评估巴西家庭厨房良好实践的工具。我们根据巴西食品安全委员会的第 216 号决议(RDC 216)、第 275 号决议(RDC 275)、国际标准化组织(ISO 22000)的 22000 标准和食品法典委员会标准,编制了初步检查表。七位在该领域具有丰富经验的专家参与了检查表的验证和语义评估。为了确保项目的重要性(防止食品污染)和措辞的清晰性,我们采用了至少 7 位专家中有 5 位(-值≥0.7)达成一致的标准来批准项目。此外,对于重要性(内容验证)和清晰度(语义评估)的评估,项目的平均值应≥3,以便在工具中保留。在专家阶段之后,我们还与由 13 名本科生、一名主持人和一名过程观察员组成的焦点小组对检查表进行了另一次语义评估,以评估每个项目的清晰度,考虑到他们对项目的理解程度。最终版本的检查表由 77 个项目组成,分为四个板块。开发的检查表在内容方面经过验证,W 值为 0.86,并在语义评估中获得通过。